Blind Item #1
"He would have me wait in my room and then call me to dinner which was always served to us. I wasn't allowed out of my room during the 30 minutes before food was served. After dinner he would send me back to my room or to check on _________. Thirty minutes later I would be summoned and would sit next to him as he made us watch movie after movie and he would tell me why it was good or bad and what I should do and what movie I should do. After they were finished he would tell me goodnight and I was expected to leave and go back to my room."
Former B list mostly movie actress who is now a C+ with A list name recognition in a upcoming interview to be published next month.
TOMKAT
ReplyDeleteThere is no way she isn't under a strict confidentiality clause, I assume that's how she managed to get primary custody..
DeleteI was thinking Katie Holmes until I read mostly movie.
ReplyDelete@FSP Have you seen recent reveals? The descriptions make no sense sometimes.
DeleteKatie has been mostly movie since she Finished with Dawson's Creek which was 10 years ago.
ReplyDeleteI saw The Gift, just like Rosenberg and Goldstein, by the way.
Nice.
I wouldn't take the 'mostly movie' too seriously. my guess is that some of the blinds are written by brits from the daily mirror who don't really know about american tv etc.
ReplyDeleteI get a Hefner/Sheen vibe of kept whores.
ReplyDeleteYeah, it has to be Katie Holmes.
ReplyDeleteI guess Sheen/Richards, checking on Mueller or some other crack ho?
ReplyDelete@count i thought about those skanks holly and kendra but i figured enty wasnt talking pornos for movies.
ReplyDeleteMiss Piggy and Kermit. She had to check on Animal.
ReplyDeleteOr TomKat fits too.
Interview to be published where?
@Peter - I'm thinking the same thing. It sounds like Katie, but I'm sure there's an agreement so she won't talk.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Katie will ever reveal the truth, too much to lose.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, the blind is written to make us think it's Tomkat.
I'm going with Sienna who allegedly dated James Franco. Definitely sounds like him. I think she is on the cover if an international Harpers Bazaar, but I could have imagined seeing that.
ReplyDeleteC+ with A list name? That is definitley Katie, there was a reveal describing her like that not too long ago
ReplyDeleteLara flynn boyle-jack nicholson
ReplyDeleteAgree that this reeks of Katie Holmes, and signing a confidentiality clause would be the only way Tom let her have primary custody, UNLESS Suri isn't his biological daughter, in which case she had considerably more leverage in the divorce negotiations, especially since she didn't take any money from him.
ReplyDeleteKatie Holmes. And wow. I can't wait to read that interview. Surprised she can do it, though.
ReplyDeleteWhy would Katie Holmes trash her child's father in the press? If he isn't Suri's dad, why would Katie admit that now? Wouldn't it make her look like a gold-digger and a liar, too?
ReplyDeleteI don't think this is Katie. She'd have nothing to gain from it.
This is supposed to be Katie, but surprised she could talk about it.
ReplyDeleteReally does sound like TomKat but while reading it Rooney Mara & director for Dragon Tattoo came to mind.
ReplyDelete@Topper, Katie is trying to regain some momentum for her career so a magazine interview makes sense. She's not trashing Tom if she truthfully and plainly states what being married to him was like. It would also explain why she eventually left him, and the blind doesn't say that Katie intends to discuss Suri's paternity, so there's no lying or gold digging going on.
ReplyDeleteWhat about Megan Fox and the douchebag she's with?
ReplyDelete@Poppymann, I doubt it. They just announced Megan is expecting a second child.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it Gwyneth Paltrow that has an interview coming out that she's not happy about?
ReplyDeleteThe "watching hours of his movies" sounds just like the midget that is Tom. Btw has he even seen Suri since she broke her arm??? Scio-douche.
ReplyDeletepretty sure Katie is never going to reveal what went on in that marriage
ReplyDeletehas to be someone else
Duh, it's Katie. Plus, wasn't this one written a while back and everyone guessed it to be her?
ReplyDeleteif katie ever wrote a memoir about her life espcially with tommy boy it would be sold out for weeks. It would outbeat 50 shades of gray, harry potter etc.
ReplyDeleteI'm going with Katie, but I also expect a total denial from her people that there was ever even an interview & if it's a British paper, then a huge libel suit to follow.
ReplyDeleteWhy couldn't it be Nicole or Mimi?
ReplyDeletePriscilla Presley? Just to be different.
ReplyDeletesame legal deals were prob cut with all of the exes......so none of them I don't think
ReplyDeletePatty - what's green and stinks of pork?
ReplyDeleteKermit the frog's finger.
Let's try to remember to check next month if this interview is every published and bring it up on next Katie holmes blind.
ReplyDeleteI'm guessing the reason Katie fared so much better in the marriage than Nicole is that Katie's father is a lawyer, and I'm sure she brought the prenup to him to review. I'll bet her dad warned her about Scientology, too.
ReplyDeleteKatie got the primo divorce because her father is one of the best divorce attorneys in the country.
ReplyDeleteIt's Katie.
I believe you mean Toledo. His practice is in Toledo, which... Have you been? And his primary isn't divorce or matrimonial law.
Delete"...UNLESS Suri isn't his biological daughter, in which case she had considerably more leverage in the divorce negotiations."
ReplyDeleteGah, how many times do I have to correct this? By virtue of being Katie's husband when Suri was born, Tom has full custody rights. It doesn't matter if he's not the biological father.
I guess I'm old. I was guessing Mia Farrow and Woody Allen.
ReplyDeleteBut perhaps she is forever A+++.
Profane is right. If a guy is married and signs the birth certificate, the kid is his. Even if it is found out later by DNA that he isn't bio dad. One of the many things wtong in family laws. A guy should be able to sue for fraud in such cases.
ReplyDeleteProfane is right. If a guy is married and signs the birth certificate, the kid is his. Even if it is found out later by DNA that he isn't bio dad. One of the many things wtong in family laws. A guy should be able to sue for fraud in such cases.
ReplyDelete@B. Profane, I'm aware of the legal technicalities. I addressed the situation from a more subtle perspective, one that awards the real negotiating power in the event Tom isn't Suri's bio dad to Katie, because then the only question that really matters becomes - Does he want the world to know or not? If that was the case, Katie = driver's seat.
ReplyDeleteTom and Katie got married AFTER Suri was born
ReplyDeleteOh, yeah. This is Tom and Katie. She has an interview coming out next month. She is the one who called the reporter and asked that something she said be removed from the final version, because she didn't want her child to read it about her father one day.
ReplyDeleteSomeone could be repeating an overheard conversation of Katies, unknownst to Katie.
ReplyDelete