Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Blind Item #1

"He would have me wait in my room and then call me to dinner which was always served to us. I wasn't allowed out of my room during the 30 minutes before food was served. After dinner he would send me back to my room or to check on _________. Thirty minutes later I would be summoned and would sit next to him as he made us watch movie after movie and he would tell me why it was good or bad and what I should do and what movie I should do. After they were finished he would tell me goodnight and I was expected to leave and go back to my room."

Former B list mostly movie actress who is now a C+ with A list name recognition in a upcoming interview to be published next month.

46 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. There is no way she isn't under a strict confidentiality clause, I assume that's how she managed to get primary custody..

      Delete
  2. I was thinking Katie Holmes until I read mostly movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @FSP Have you seen recent reveals? The descriptions make no sense sometimes.

      Delete
  3. Katie has been mostly movie since she Finished with Dawson's Creek which was 10 years ago.

    I saw The Gift, just like Rosenberg and Goldstein, by the way.

    Nice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wouldn't take the 'mostly movie' too seriously. my guess is that some of the blinds are written by brits from the daily mirror who don't really know about american tv etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I get a Hefner/Sheen vibe of kept whores.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, it has to be Katie Holmes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I guess Sheen/Richards, checking on Mueller or some other crack ho?

    ReplyDelete
  8. @count i thought about those skanks holly and kendra but i figured enty wasnt talking pornos for movies.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Miss Piggy and Kermit. She had to check on Animal.

    Or TomKat fits too.

    Interview to be published where?

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Peter - I'm thinking the same thing. It sounds like Katie, but I'm sure there's an agreement so she won't talk.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't think Katie will ever reveal the truth, too much to lose.

    That being said, the blind is written to make us think it's Tomkat.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm going with Sienna who allegedly dated James Franco. Definitely sounds like him. I think she is on the cover if an international Harpers Bazaar, but I could have imagined seeing that.

    ReplyDelete
  13. C+ with A list name? That is definitley Katie, there was a reveal describing her like that not too long ago

    ReplyDelete
  14. Lara flynn boyle-jack nicholson

    ReplyDelete
  15. Agree that this reeks of Katie Holmes, and signing a confidentiality clause would be the only way Tom let her have primary custody, UNLESS Suri isn't his biological daughter, in which case she had considerably more leverage in the divorce negotiations, especially since she didn't take any money from him.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Katie Holmes. And wow. I can't wait to read that interview. Surprised she can do it, though.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Why would Katie Holmes trash her child's father in the press? If he isn't Suri's dad, why would Katie admit that now? Wouldn't it make her look like a gold-digger and a liar, too?

    I don't think this is Katie. She'd have nothing to gain from it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is supposed to be Katie, but surprised she could talk about it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Really does sound like TomKat but while reading it Rooney Mara & director for Dragon Tattoo came to mind.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Topper, Katie is trying to regain some momentum for her career so a magazine interview makes sense. She's not trashing Tom if she truthfully and plainly states what being married to him was like. It would also explain why she eventually left him, and the blind doesn't say that Katie intends to discuss Suri's paternity, so there's no lying or gold digging going on.

    ReplyDelete
  21. What about Megan Fox and the douchebag she's with?

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Poppymann, I doubt it. They just announced Megan is expecting a second child.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Isn't it Gwyneth Paltrow that has an interview coming out that she's not happy about?

    ReplyDelete
  24. The "watching hours of his movies" sounds just like the midget that is Tom. Btw has he even seen Suri since she broke her arm??? Scio-douche.

    ReplyDelete
  25. pretty sure Katie is never going to reveal what went on in that marriage

    has to be someone else

    ReplyDelete
  26. Duh, it's Katie. Plus, wasn't this one written a while back and everyone guessed it to be her?

    ReplyDelete
  27. if katie ever wrote a memoir about her life espcially with tommy boy it would be sold out for weeks. It would outbeat 50 shades of gray, harry potter etc.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm going with Katie, but I also expect a total denial from her people that there was ever even an interview & if it's a British paper, then a huge libel suit to follow.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Why couldn't it be Nicole or Mimi?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Priscilla Presley? Just to be different.

    ReplyDelete
  31. same legal deals were prob cut with all of the exes......so none of them I don't think

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous12:01 PM

    Patty - what's green and stinks of pork?
    Kermit the frog's finger.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Let's try to remember to check next month if this interview is every published and bring it up on next Katie holmes blind.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I'm guessing the reason Katie fared so much better in the marriage than Nicole is that Katie's father is a lawyer, and I'm sure she brought the prenup to him to review. I'll bet her dad warned her about Scientology, too.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Katie got the primo divorce because her father is one of the best divorce attorneys in the country.
    It's Katie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe you mean Toledo. His practice is in Toledo, which... Have you been? And his primary isn't divorce or matrimonial law.

      Delete
  36. "...UNLESS Suri isn't his biological daughter, in which case she had considerably more leverage in the divorce negotiations."

    Gah, how many times do I have to correct this? By virtue of being Katie's husband when Suri was born, Tom has full custody rights. It doesn't matter if he's not the biological father.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I guess I'm old. I was guessing Mia Farrow and Woody Allen.

    But perhaps she is forever A+++.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Profane is right. If a guy is married and signs the birth certificate, the kid is his. Even if it is found out later by DNA that he isn't bio dad. One of the many things wtong in family laws. A guy should be able to sue for fraud in such cases.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Profane is right. If a guy is married and signs the birth certificate, the kid is his. Even if it is found out later by DNA that he isn't bio dad. One of the many things wtong in family laws. A guy should be able to sue for fraud in such cases.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @B. Profane, I'm aware of the legal technicalities. I addressed the situation from a more subtle perspective, one that awards the real negotiating power in the event Tom isn't Suri's bio dad to Katie, because then the only question that really matters becomes - Does he want the world to know or not? If that was the case, Katie = driver's seat.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Tom and Katie got married AFTER Suri was born

    ReplyDelete
  42. Oh, yeah. This is Tom and Katie. She has an interview coming out next month. She is the one who called the reporter and asked that something she said be removed from the final version, because she didn't want her child to read it about her father one day.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Someone could be repeating an overheard conversation of Katies, unknownst to Katie.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days