Thursday, August 15, 2013

Blind Items Revealed

May 13, 2013

This A+ list female singer fulfilled one of her lifelong dreams. She had sex in the dressing room of this all-time A++ list rocker this past weekend.  Not with the rocker, just in the dressing room. The problem is she could not find her panties after the incident and performed on stage and she says the first five rows had no problems confirming the fact she was not wearing anything under her skirt.

Katy Perry


26 comments:

  1. Her lifelong dream was to have sex in someone's dressing room?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think we all knew this was her in Mick Jaggers d/r

    ReplyDelete
  3. quite the view for the fans there......

    ReplyDelete
  4. Knew it was her. My friend saw her perform at G-A-Y a few years ago, said she wasn't wearing any underwear and enjoyed flashing her lady box.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:36 AM

    Was John Mayer the dude she had sex with?

    ReplyDelete
  6. So she had sex in some really famous guy's room, but not with him, then went onstage without skivvies?
    Doesn't make sense. She obviously has people who can run out and get what she needs. If she went out bare, it was on purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is cracking me up and I'm not sure why. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous9:56 AM

    I know it's "cool" to b wild and shameless about sexuality these days, but what if someone within those 5 rows didn't appreciate her little SHOW?

    Get over yourself Katy. Not everyone is impressed by your junk..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:58 AM

      Now if HAMMOCONDA donned a kilt and was on that same stage I'd b really stabby if I were sitting in the sixth row or beyond.

      Delete
    2. Oh , fancy, you are singing my song!!!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:01 PM

      @liddy....

      Lol.....;^)

      Delete
  9. Just me or is Enty really stretching the intent of a blind item these days? Now every other post is a blind and I guess clicks are up, which is the point. But very lame.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't know. If she was on stage and 5 rows saw her piss flaps, I'm sure there would be some cell phone snaps floating around.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I bet she has a very pretty lady box. And, yeah, where are all the photos?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Not just you @NonNom, this is becoming nothing but a Blind Item site, and the majority of the blinds are obvious, and only the most benign are revealed. Sads.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I wonder if the first five rows could see a little 'dew' on her lilly!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Not true, because there would be literally 1000's of cell phone photos.

    ReplyDelete
  15. not one spare pair of panties of her own in her own dressing room? No pictures of her flashing the audience? Hmph, I'm calling shenanigans.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Max Hardcore - I don't think either of them broads are scared of piss.

    Veronica Moser - Google turns it up as a 6 y/o victim of the Batman shootings. I don't get that. Why a pedo gonna hire an of age whore?

    ReplyDelete
  17. When did Katy Perry become such a skanky ho? Which leads to another question. If even half of these blinds are true what the fuck is wrong with all these people? Have they no morals, no dignity, no self-respect? What kind of fucking pieces of shit are they?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Count

    http://www.veronica-moser.com/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ramone Love, it's not cool to have any of those things nowadays! Get with the times, bro!

    (I agree with you though. People are nasty)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Having sex in someone's dressing room sounds like a pretty achievable life's goal to me. I think all you have to do most of the time is wait in line.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @bluemusic: that skank is a huge dose of boner b gone w/o tsking the poop into consideration.

    ReplyDelete
  22. There's a video on YouTube of Katy's performance with Mick. She was wearing a rather tight skirt so it's quite conceivable she was commando underneath...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFJ-Q0weQEs#at=267

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete