Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Debbie Rowe Wants To Be Paris Jackson's Guardian

It is not often that I agree with the Jackson family, but this might be one of those times. Unfortunately I don't have a better option. Debbie Rowe says she would love to be the guardian of Paris and will be filing paperwork trying to become guardian in light of Paris' co-guardian moving an hour away. The Jackson family does not want Debbie to be the guardian. I agree. First, Debbie might seem like the quiet type but she has consistently sold stories to the media about her relationship with Paris, including photos. She also was the first to talk to the press about the suicide attempt. I think it is a money grab. I also think it is a bad idea to split the children which is what would happen. My best option, and this is kind of crazy after what happened last year is to give them to Janet. She is married now and despite what happened last year I think has money and has always shied away from publicity. She might be the best choice.

46 comments:

  1. Janet married a Middle Eastern guy. Do they live in the US or in his home country?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can't the bean just adopt them??? She's only 20, so I'm totally joking, but she actually would provide more stability than the "grown-ups" in these kids' lives.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I vote for none of the above!

    ReplyDelete
  4. They arent puppies to be given away for adoption!!!!! Mb judge can make ruling if debbie is source of any stories, her guardianship is terminated. Ask the children what THEY want. Poor blanket, for his name but also, no mom, no dad. Just series of strangers. Kid looks MISERABLE In every pic of him ive ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Give them to JANET?!? Oh hell no. Janet was at the heart of the family's most recent abduction of their mother. Are you kidding me? It's too early to be drinking Enty, lol.
    Debbie is their biological mother, and nothing she's ever done is on par with the shenanigans the Jackson family is capable of.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also vote against Janet. That family like a nest of vipers! Get them outta there!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I dunno. The Jackson's with their (rumored) incestuous uncle and proven cash grab, Janet with her highly stable international billionare's lifestyle, or Debbie and her horse farm and possible minimal cash grab? I still pick Debbie and the horse farm. For all we know, Paris wanted those stories told.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Perhaps someone should ask Paris what is going on and what she wants. What was the reason for this suicide attempt? I read elsewhere that Debbie is neither seeking custody, nor will fight it if that's what the courts decide. That she never relinquished her parental rights when she agreed to the current custody arrangement.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Also, let's not forget that it was the current guardian's who allowed Prince to be a "special correspondent" for Entertainment Tonight. That's even worse than selling stories to the media (which is bad enough), because it also exploits an underage kid. No good options here; it's just picking the lesser evil.

    ReplyDelete
  10. *guardians, not guardian's

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think she should be allowed to make the choice herself. She's old enough to decide who she wants to live with.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think splitting the children up isn't the best idea, especially for the other two, but honestly, I think Debbie is the lesser of two evils.

    The Jacksons have shown time and again that they are nothing more than money-grubbing sycophants, as witnessed (once again) by their suing AEG over Michael's death. Michael was a hard-core drug addict, who probably wouldn't have lived a long life anyway, but hey, they saw an opportunity to possibly get more $$$, so of course they went for it.

    I think Janet would be a lousy choice, as witnessed by her involvement in her mother's "disappearance" last summer. She's super-tight with Randy, who is the instigator in a lot of these family dramas. Never mind that she's living in Bahrain or wherever it is, Paris needs to be close to everyone and everything she knows. Debbie is after all, her biological mother. I think that makes the most sense.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh I think you're right...
    If Prince is emancipated she can go with him...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Give them to Diana Ross. She's got a passel of kids and is their godmother.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Surfer said it best! +1

    Really, though, she's old enough to be asked who/what she wants, but is her judgement sound?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree that Paris is old enough to decide.

    ReplyDelete
  17. no one with the last name jackson should be allowed custody of these children.

    and stupid but serious question if the jackson's win this lawsuit against AEG what do they expect to happen? wouldn't any money won in the lawsuit go to michael's children?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Isn't Janet part of a harem now? There are no pictures of her living a happy life in the middle east. She's now a converted Muslim so shouldn't she be wearing a burqua or at the very least covering most of her body in a disguise?? That's not a good life for any woman. Janet made a big, big mistake. Time will tell, but I'm pretty sure Janet is nothing more than a trophy, about the same as Demi was to Asston - for awhile.

    Those kids need to be emancipated with paid guardians who are reviewed by the courts monthly. Katherine and all Jacksons need to be cut off from the money train. Paris, Prince and Blanket need to go far, far away, change their names and start a new life - under oversight of above mentioned guardians. I don't see how courts can leave those kids with the very person who OK'd the abuse their father suffered.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I read somewhere last night that Katherine had reached out to Debbie to help with Paris after the suicide attempt--for which--if it happened--I give her a lot of credit--at this point the family--both the Jacksons and Debbie and Prince need to put aside their own feelings and try to do whatever is best for this girl.

    I don't know enough about Debbie--the only impression I have of her is an interview she did a couple of years ago right after Michael died that I saw--and at that time I thought she came off pretty sincere and wanting the best for the kids--she got her money so unless she's blown it all she doesn't seem to be after the money to me.

    I also don't think Janet is the best choice --after all the fighting a few months ago, unless that is all healed, which I doubt, I think that might make things worse not better.

    I kind of agree that maybe they should let Prince and Paris set up as emancipated minors with some kind of allowance and try to let the family only be involved from a distance, although I've read that Prince has been upset with Paris for reuniting with Debbie--so that may be a problem. He did finally go to the hospital and see her so hopefully they are ok with each other.

    I think the court is ordering an investigation of the kids situation after this happened with Paris so hopefully they will look close and talk to the kids and find out what is really best for them.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't know if Debbie Rowe is the answer. But I do know her current living situation is not. So, keeping the status quo (and Janet is a part of that) is not going to help her.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Wow, equation, that was a very misinformed comment that you made. Not all Muslim women wear burqas, but it's nice that you assume they're all the same. I have many Muslim female friends and they are all successful, educated women who dress no different from other American women. But way to stereotype.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Now that she's supposedly out of Scieno, what about...Lisa Marie? If anybody would 'get' Paris and the other Jackson kids, she would.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I don't if Debbie Rowe is the answer, I hate how she's STILL selling stories. That's has to stop. And I think the kids should stay together.

    I vote going to Diana Ross. But either way, the judge needs to put an order about no selling stories to the media.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Can't one of the financial trustees adopt them. They are the only ones that put Michael's estate in the black and are working for the good of the estate not their pockets.

    Now I see why men like Conrad Hilton and Warren Buffett put their entire fortune to charity.

    The families will go insane fighting over that money so take it out of the equation and let them live their own lives by their own gains or failures. Instead of having a bloated trust everyone wants to suck off of instead of getting a life and career for themselves.


    ReplyDelete
  25. I feel so terribly sorry for Prince Michael, Paris and Blanket. The only person who truly loved them is dead, everyone else looks at them and sees whatever they need from them (money, legal leverage, the last bit of MJ for his fans, evidence of MJ's oddity for those who hate him...) it just makes me so sad. I nominate Lisa Marie Presley, who might be the only person on Earth who knows how it is. I wish they'd married after the kids, then she'd probably still have them.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I am feeling very "Debbie Rowe" today....sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Janet? Latoya would be a better choice. She doesn't have much to do with her family anymore after the way they inserted themselves into her abusive marriage and along with TJ, was closer to Michael towards the end then any of the others. She never went public about it or sold stories about her relationship with Michael and the kids. Also, unlike the rest of the Jacksons, she actually works and earns her own money.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Usually the notion of a "poor little rich girl" generates eye rolls but I feel SO very sorry for this girl. I wish I could hug her and tell her that the world isn't completely comprised of users with ulterior motives but it really does seem as if her world is.

    I mean her life with Michael was far from normal but at least she felt loved. Is there a single peson in her life who truly loves her and cares about her best interests now? And I agree with auntliddy Blanket always looks absolutely miserable too.

    Emancipation with allowance seems like the best choice imho, especially if the trustees are still protecting the bulk of the estate from the vultures. Whatever happens, I wish these children happiness and stability.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I feel so bad for all of these kids. The worst part is how the media has spun this entire suicide attempt to try and make it seem like Paris just wants attention and that she is into the drama. She's a fucking kid, and where there is smoke there is fire. Something is obviously going on in that house that's pushing her into the home of someone she does not have much of a relationship with. The Jackson family is a brood of sick people. Debbie looks like a pretty good option at this point, at least until Paris is old enough to care for herself and her brothers on her own.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  31. The whole pack of them-the Jackson Family-are a hot ass mess. Those children would be better in the woods with a flashlight and a pack of hot dogs. The Grandmother is in her 80's, various aunts, uncles, cousins, "family friends" all want a piece of the action and are selling stories as soon as one of them walk by. How would you feel as a kid, losing the one person that you could honestly trust and then wondering every time someone wanted to do something with you if they were there for other motives? These children, just like ANY child, deserve a happy childhood.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Paris needs to live with Denise Richards.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I want to be Paris' guardian. I don't even know her, and I'd take better care of and protect her.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Jeebus. I may as well take the kids. Or one of you. Really. A total stranger with no patience for the media bullshit would be a better guardian than anyone who is going to trade on the Jackson name to earn some bucks on the side. That's just despicable. Jacko may have been "wacko", but for all intents and purposes, he kept those kids out of the limelight.

    I think this is among the lesser dramas we will see unfold over the years with the three kids. Too many sharks in the water.

    ReplyDelete
  35. All christians are polygamist mormons, right? Or wait, no they're ortodoxs that fast. Or no, wait the women must cover their heads after they are married, right? And they belive that their GOD is really three? Or is it? I'm confused.

    ReplyDelete
  36. If anyone gets the children, why not Rebbie? She stays away from the limelight and wasn't in that mess from last year. It's rumored she's raised Janet's daughter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also vote Rebbie. I thought she was the only sane one of the family.

      Delete
    2. actually freya rebbie was part of the thing last year b/c they took katherine to rebbie's house.

      Delete
  37. I saw the Oprah interview and poor Blanket was just sitting there when Katherine said "sit up straight!!" If Paris leaves, Prince is doing his thing, where would that leave Blanket? Debbie needs to take all three. Palmdale would be a big change from where they live now. That Jackson bunch is a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think all 3 kids should go live with Denise Richards.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Enty you know youre right. Janet would be the best realistic option.
    Hell I'd even suggest having Khloe Kardashian adopt the kids over Debbie Rowe getting them or Katherine keeping them. I was talking to a MJ fan yesterday and she said that some people think Katherine staged the kidnapping attempt last year. Of course none of us know what really went on there, but with Katherine bringing the lawsuit against AEG and not appearing to want to drop it--and her wanting the kids especially Paris to testify which evudently sent Paris over the edge--Im begininng to think every Jackson but Janet is nothing but a money hungry vulture. Makes me actually glad to be.an anonymous impoverished only child.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Oh holy crap. These kids would be better off as emancipated minors, and yes, I'm being sarcastic as I say that. A family of dogs would be kinder to and less demanding of these kids.

    These people should be ashamed of themselves, but of course they never are.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Me and my colleague were watching TMZ when Paris came on. He said she had "white girl problems " with the attempted suicide ,etc.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Looking at that pic above, maybe she tried to kill herself because she knows what she'll look like in 30 years.

    ReplyDelete
  43. As sad and depressing as this sounds, whatever decision is made about these kids right now is only postponing the inevitable overdoses, arrests, suicides, etc. that lay ahead for these kids. Their fates were sealed before they were even born.

    ReplyDelete
  44. They can come and live with me! All they have to pay for is their food.

    Poor kids. All of them.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days