Thursday, May 02, 2013

Voice Of Elmo Nominated For Emmy Award

Despite being accused by several men of having sex with them when they were underage, Kevin Clash aka the voice of Elmo has been nominated for a Daytime Emmy. The nominations announced yesterday have Kevin Clash up against three other people in the category of performer in a children's series. Clash has won 23 previous Emmy Awards. That is like one for every teen he had sex with. The show will be aired live on June 16. I don't know if the voters just don't read the tabloids or they just don't care, but this is something the Academy should be really embarrassed about.

29 comments:

  1. But who will he bring as his date?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question. His usuals wouldn't be able to stay out that late because of curfew.

      Delete
  2. Who's the betch that let that happen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know, but they obviously need to betch slapped.

      Delete
  3. A whole lot of unproven claims, many of which end up being dropped, and you being a "lawyer" have assumed guilt before fully seeing all the evidence? That's disgruntling a little.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well damn ain't that a betch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @lotta Lol stop trying to make betch happen. I had to jump on that bandwagon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @skimpy- I want my pink shirt back!

      Delete
    2. On Wednesdays we wear pink

      Delete
  6. The Daytime Emmys nominated Guy's Family Reunion for an award too. They're not exactly a mark of quality.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Creepy and mega awkward if he wins.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's a puppet, not a priest so it's alright.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What is Betch, lotta? lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. dragon, Lotta prefers to be called a betch instead of bitch or beach. Because she's a picky betch.

      Delete
  10. Are the Daytime Emmys the only non-biased award voting system? I feel like all of them, especially the Oscars, skew it to nominate who they want, deserving or not. I'm surprised they would include him even though he has not been found guilty yet. Maybe they don't stuff the ballot box so to speak.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Just because he may or may not be a completely disgusting sob doesn't mean he doesn't perform that stupid voice well. I mean, it's an Emmy, not a humanitarian award....

    ReplyDelete
  12. You can win awards for talking in an annoying voice while talking down to children? I'm surprised my 8th grade English teacher doesn't have a closet full of Emmy's by now.

    ReplyDelete
  13. And the awards goes to Dickle me El.. I mean Tickle me Elmo.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I don't mean to be like the only person standing over here in the corner saying Michael Jackson was innocent, but doesn't he just stand accused right now?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah these are accusations and if I recall they are civil suits not criminal correct? I'm sure someone will correct me, which is good. I seriously think these were shakedowns on Kevin.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I know I'm repeating what others have said here, but "claims" are a far cry from proven acts or convictions. As a rule, I will give a child the benefit of the doubt if they make an abuse claim, but these were ADULT MEN who made these claims after they turned 18 & these claims magically disappeared when money changed hands. If the abuse really happened & they dropped their claims for $$ then they too are culpable for continuing abuse & shame on them!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Only in Hollywood would a pedo be nomo'ed

    ReplyDelete
  18. I've got no issue with this. His nomination is based solely on his work. How many Oscar winners are completely vile human beings? Exactly.

    ReplyDelete
  19. So say some priest was really good at being a priest but was a pedo you're fine with recognizing his priestly good works? Yeah, didn't think so. Big glaring double standards are so difficult to see.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It's perplexing to me why Hollywood rewards criminals (alleged or proven). I mean I know that pretty much describes most people in that industry but in Australia people lose their jobs over convictions and get suspended from their jobs pending convictions. So Elmo the Pedo is nominated for an Emmy, Chris Brown the Wife-Beater wins Grammys, Roman Polanski the Raper is nominated for Oscars. It's disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Well probably not everyone in Australia loses their jobs over unsociable behaviour but certainly in the Public Service where I work and lots of other places.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Tyger Lilly,
    In California, the statute of limitations for bringing claims of child sex abuse has been repeatedly changed in recognition of the contention that sex abuse victims often don't talk about it at the time, to anyone, and don't want to admit it even later. People have til age 26 to make a claim now in California. It's probably similar in other states. Now if you're bringing a child sex abuse claim in your 30s, 40s and 50s, and you can under certain circums, I'd say that definitely goes to the weight of the claim. Not so much if they're still in the 20s. Also, same question: if it was accusations against a priest by men in their 20s, would you be so forgiving? Be honest. No, you would not.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days