Sunday, September 23, 2012

Lindsay Lohan Is Going To Sue Pedestrian Who She Hit

Lindsay Lohan is under the illusion that she does not drink. She is also trying to get this guy she hit with her car off her back. The man she hit last week says that Lindsay smelled like booze. Police have said Lindsay was not drinking. He didn't say she had been drinking, he said she smelled like booze. It probably comes out of her pores after all those years of drinking. Anyway, Lindsay is going to sue him because she says that people won't hire her if they think she has been drinking. Umm, first of all Lindsay, they don't hire you because you are a bad actress who thinks you are A+ list. Second, you have been drinking in the past two weeks. Your mom's birthday party. Ordering and drinking doubles. Lindsay has no chance of winning and is just trying to strong arm this guy into dropping the charges.

Posted by ent lawyer at 10:30 AM

Labels:

30 comments:

  1. dia papaya10:34 AM

    I hope she goes to court and loses. Ordered to pay his legal fees, license revoked and then makes a public apology in that Frog voice of hers.

    That apology will be her best acting evah!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brenda L10:38 AM

    All I have to say is that if Amanda Bynes gets a harsh punishment or jail time, I'm going to be mad.

    ReplyDelete
  3. timebob 10:38 AM

    haha this reminds me of Sam Ronson suing Perez Hilton over some posts and she sued, lost and had to pay his legal fees.

    Hello, Lindsay it is called Freedom of Speech. And actually the Police didn't say she wasn't drinking they didn't administer a breathalyzer on her. So there is no real way to know if she was drinking or not.

    Good luck with that defamation of character lawsuit, I can see the jury giggling already.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The_BKC10:38 AM

    Wait............did enty just give up the clues on the blind about the d list actress with a list name recognition who has to audition but doesnt think she should have to??!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. whocaresnow1210:41 AM

    Shawn Holley cannot be stupid enough to move forward with this, or any other attorney. Everything is hearsay, there was no breathalyzer and she wasn't arrested for intoxication, she was arrested for knowingly fleeing the scene of an alleged accident. All she had to do after she got out of the car, and checked the car (which is evident that she was aware she hit something) was walk up to the guy and simply state "nothing happened but let's just file our own police reports just in case". Her problem us SHE CHECKED THE DAMN CAR FOR DAMAGE BECAUSE SHE BELIEVED SHE HIT SOMETGING OR SOMEONE!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tru Leigh10:46 AM

    This is a legal gambit. Counter-sue the sue-er and the legal fees are not covered under the contingency fees from the lawsuit brought by the pedestrian. As most people can't afford to pay a lawyer, the sue-er very often has no choice but to drop the suit.

    This doesn't relieve her of the charges brought by the district attorney.

    ReplyDelete
  7. whocaresnow1210:51 AM

    Usually, the courts will order the plantif to pay court costs and pay legal fees for the defendant. In hearsay cases that are clearly cut and dry, such as this, most attorneys will work on a contingency basis.

    ReplyDelete
  8. timebob 11:02 AM

    All this is, is the stand Lohan strategy. Create subterfuge and filibuster to distract people from the actual crime she commited.

    I am not distracted, she hit someone left the scene and had her assistant check for damage. She did something wrong and she knows it. She never wants to deal with or accept responsibility for her actions. And get out of my City!

    ReplyDelete
  9. surfer11:09 AM

    Here, here timebob!

    And correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember the "victim" saying he was going to sue - all he said was that she smelled like booze.

    You know what they say - past behavior is a predictor (or indicator) of future behavior. It's not like she's known for being sober.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Honey Bunny11:13 AM

    D*mn! That child has got serious problems!

    ReplyDelete
  11. parissucksliterally11:30 AM

    I fucking hate this asshole excuse for a woman.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Staple61111:46 AM

    @whocares, neither of those two things are true. Or even close to being true.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Unknown12:13 PM

    Anyone notice that lately TMZ hasn't been kissing her ass as much? Like they're calling her out on her criminal past and stuff. Maybe she pissed them off

    ReplyDelete
  14. smash12:27 PM

    Don't you all realize this wasn't her fault?! It was the cars breaks! ;) hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  15. Turkish Taffy12:27 PM

    Oh, good heavens! Why doesn't she sue that orange cone for not moving out of her way?

    I'm sure we can think of some other scenarios. Like suing that young woman who wore the fur coat to a club so Lindsay could steal it. That was entrapment, right?

    ReplyDelete
  16. whocaresnow1212:34 PM

    @Unknown-right. Nothing is ever true, or is that untrue....unknown?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Staple6111:05 PM

    @whocares, that doesn't make sense, much like your first comment on the subject. If you're writing from a foreign country, you are half right - but I don't think you are.

    In the United States, courts award legal costs and fees in two situations: (a) where it's required by contract, and (b) where a statute provides for it (i.e., a party is suing under a particular law that provides that the prevailing party can be awarded fees & costs, which is typically discretionary). This would be an intentional tort case, which is neither of those situations.

    As to your second point, because it is an intentional tort case, it is true that attorneys would sometimes work on contingency. But typically in defamation/privacy cases, they do not. And since Lindsay is the one claiming defamation here, you can rest assured that no attorney is taking this on a contingency basis.

    So yeah, I stand by my statement that neither thing you said is even close to being true. But by all means, continue dispensing legal opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ramone Love1:09 PM

    That face tells you everything you need to know about this waste of genetic material

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bleu2:02 PM

    This is rich -- Lindsay truly does defame just about non-celebrity who ever filed any allegation against her because of something she did (and TMZ runs all her shit spinning too, which is despicable and actionable under the law). That guy who she hit who "sources close to Lindsay" told TMZ had multiple insurance fraud convictions? Never ever filed even one insurance claim in his life. She's ... vile, and has this systematic plan of defaming people and/or strong-arming them, and it really ought to be a crime in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  20. whocaresnow122:37 PM

    This would NOT fully satisfy the necessary definition of an intentional torts case. There is no possible way for Lindsay to prove that the defendant Acted with purpose and with substantial certainty would result in a tortious result. None of the following happened to enter into a tort case:

    Common law intentional torts include the following:
    Assault
    Battery
    Conversion
    False imprisonment
    Trespass to land
    Trespass to chattels (Personal property)
    Intentional infliction of emotional distress
    Fraud
    Invasion of privacy

    ReplyDelete
  21. Staple6112:41 PM

    @whocares: Defamation is an intentional tort. So are the rest of the ones you googled.

    p.s. I am a First Amendment lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous2:43 PM

    Amy if that's true, that TMZ's saying that he's had multiple insurance fraud convictions then this is probably somewhat along the right way of taking care of this, bring to the light that this guy is scamming/shady. It's funny that Lohan would be the one to do that though. I actually think that she's sort of on to something here. Notice how I hedge my opinion in sort of-on to something? Because I can't fully agree with anything this streetwalker does. But if her claim and/or belief is that people accuse her of doing these things "just because" she's super stah Lindsay- oh vom I can't finish her frickin name even. Anyways if she thinks that people target her for frivolous lawsuits because of her bad reputation then this would be an effective way to discourage other would-be ambulance chasers going after her. Because lets face it, a jury would never believe LL is innocent of anything involving cars, alcohol or drug use. She's just been the living embodiment of trainwreck since she was what 16?

    ReplyDelete
  23. alliwholovessomuch3:29 PM

    What I want to know is if she didn't go up to him how does he know she smelt like booze? That girl needs help regardless, but she hasnt hit her own rock bottom yet so don't think she will get it.

    ReplyDelete
  24. __-__=__3:56 PM

    Where's Ali?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Mango4:27 PM

    I'm soooo over this twat.

    ReplyDelete
  26. audrey5:19 PM

    Oh that Gavin! He is so responsible for this accident too.
    Ia New York tougher on bad drivers? Or do they give celebs special treatment too?

    ReplyDelete
  27. YourNameHere5:43 PM

    I've said it before and I'll say it again. She reminds me so much of Dana Plato.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Agent**it6:30 AM

    Where's Shelly?

    ReplyDelete
  29. AKM8:53 AM

    YourNameHere, that's an interesting comparison. By all accounts, Dana had a very sweet spirit despite her addictions and problems, and told people close to her that all she really wanted was just to feel loved. (Adopted; close to adopted mother but she died young from cancer, IIRC; feelings of rejection due to being given up for adoption, although I think she met her birth mother; got pregnant young on purpose to have someone to love and love her back; etc.)

    I know I'm the CDAN Schmuck, but I wonder if there isn't some of that in LL. I'm not excusing her actions; I'm just hoping to grasp at an explanation, if you will. Social worker thing...we don't see folks as all good or all bad, you know.

    As a social worker in training and someone with her own mental issues, I still root for her in a small way.

    ReplyDelete
  30. crila169:51 AM

    Oh Lindsey will win. For someone reason, she always gets away with it. Slap on the wrist or 5 minutes in jail. Then some stupid director will hire her for a movie. This girl is getting way too many chances. They need to lock her away for a long time, before she kills someone or herself.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days

  • Blind Items Revealed #6 - Anniversary Month
    August 1, 2014 How is it that this actress is rolling in dough? I mean she could literally shower with $100 bills every few minutes and not ...
  • Blind Item #12
    An offspring of a former A++ lister is hooking up with an A+/A list singer. Their first hookup was a messy drunken spectacle in front of sev...
  • Blind Items Revealed #1
    October 15, 2024 Apparently, the growing rift between the alliterate one and her husband began shortly after the big funeral. The alliterate...
  • Blind Item #13
    For old times sake, these two bad actors/former co-stars/former couple hooked up. They will blame it on being drunk. 
  • Blind Items Revealed #1
    October 16, 2024 I guess things are getting more serious considering the permanent A list "singer" has Narcan ready to go througho...
  • Blind Items Revealed #2
    October 16, 2024 Speaking of alliterate, this foreign born alliterate A list actor thought Oscar was a lock for his latest role. Now that he...
  • Blind Items Revealed #2
    October 19, 2024 What is going to be crazy is this. Neither of the escorts the dead rocker slept with said they used protection. What if the...
  • Blind Item #8
    Speaking of A list actors and hookers, this A+/A list actor had a bevy of them while out of the country. His girlfriend probably wouldn'...
  • Blind Items Revealed #3
    October 17, 2024 Even though it is ridiculous, the permanent A list actor does actually believe his 16 month old texts him. So, obviously no...
  • Blind Items Revealed #4
    October 20, 2024 This permanent A list singer needs to look no further than her former husband (not the sperm donor one) as to why she has s...