Wednesday, June 13, 2012

National Enquirer Blind Item

WHICH Oscar-winning actress has infuriated her fiance because she skinny-dips in the family pool in front of their kids’ friends AND the household staff? Her actor-beau doesn’t mind her swimming in the buff when it’s just the two of them, but now their oldest boys’ pals have been visiting more often to catch a glimpse of the hot mom’s “splash parties.” Not to mention the gardener who almost drove the lawnmower into the house after getting an eyeful!

92 comments:

  1. This has to be Jolie, right?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I second that, @Baskingshark!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brangelina

    Helen Mirren's stepchildren are in their 30s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Personally I'd rather see Helen Mirren naked than Angelina. It'd be like looking at a Holocaust survivor.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How old is Pax? He's gotten older but isn't he still too young to fit this blind?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Maddox is older. I just looked it up, Maddox will be 11 in August and Pax is 9.

      Delete
  6. The only engaged Oscar winners with "older" sons I can think of are Angie and Kate Winslet

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jolie's oldest adopted boy must be around 10. adopted him in 2002 when he was 7 months old.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is Kate Winslet engaged?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I suppose I have to be the first to guess Betty White.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kate Winslet isn't engaged

    ReplyDelete
  11. If it's Jolie she should keep her clothes on. Can you imagine the big head, major breast implants on that stick of a body....I shutter to think.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I hope the visiting 'boys' are all of legal age, or this could become a scandal soon if their parents catch wind of it :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oscar-winning, female, engaged but not married, "their kids" (he impregnated her) -- I just can't see Jolie, with her weeping-in-the-shower fake-assed personality issues, doing this. It doesn't pass the smell test.

    ReplyDelete
  14. All the other actress winners don't have actor beaus, so it gotz to be AngJo.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'll call BS on this. You're telling me one of the kids or the gardener hasn't snapped a pic of the skinny dipping on some kind of cellphone or camera and sold it to a tabloid?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm with Barton on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This isn't Angelina Jolie.

    And I don't understand how people can be so hostile to her. With all the idiotic, narcissistic a-holes in Hollywood, she's one of the only ones who uses her celebrity to advocate for people with no rights, no home, no safety net. She actually puts her money where her mouth is, giving away a third of her income. There are so many celebs out there who ask for it by putting themselves out there and doing stupid self-serving things. I think people are really unfair to Angie. And I'm not a stan or anything but I am concerned with world affairs and think she's one of the few American celebrities who makes a difference.

    Sorry for the rant, but I had to get it off my chest. :/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. A lot of unhappy and petty people on this site.

      Delete
    2. Eve- agree with ya 100%!!!

      Delete
    3. It's a gossip site! Get over yourselves already!

      Delete
  18. Yep this sounds like typical NE BS.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Maybe she adopted Brad and nobody noticed.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Whom ever it is they sound loony. How hard is it to put a bathing suit on?

    ReplyDelete
  21. As much as I think she is beautiful, I don't think her body is "hot". Perhaps everyone (including the gardener) was just distracted from all the bones jutting out of her skin.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Eve, I find Jolie's claims of saving the world the most offensive thing about her. It is pure PR to recreate her image. They keep as much money as they "donate" from those pics. There have been rumors that the babies she adopted were done via under the table payments and stories all about that but not enough room here to go into. Sorry, her posing in third world countries while holding her Louis Vuitton is not impressive. Many celebrities donate time and money without sending out a press release. Her rewritten reputation is one of the most repugnant things about her IMO and as calculated as any wartime general.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hv never sern jolie in any designer shit unless shes on red carpet. I think she is very sincere. How come bono's a saint, and shes a poser? I dont think she cares remotely about her public image!

      Delete
  23. Good luck eve, you are swimming upstream. I don't care if aj has ulterior motives--which from the blogs it sure seems she does--or is she is maniacal about her image, doing good is doing good and we need more of it.

    ReplyDelete
  24. By the way, "their kids" doesn't necessarily mean he impregnated her. Adopted children are "theirs" too. (Not saying it's AJ for the blind)

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Elizabeth, 100% agree. Esp since she works with the UN who are notoriously dishonest and wasteful. But a good PR front, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I agree with Elizabeth. Everything this lady does is calculated to say "look at me".

    ReplyDelete
  27. What evidence is there that AJ is "doing good"?

    The UN is a corrupt, useless organization. If THAT is your measuring stick, you need a new one.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Halley Berry?
    Does Olivier have any kids from previous relationships?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Despite all the Jolie apologists, this sounds like AJ.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous10:30 AM

    Remember The Leg?same thing. Look at me. Look at my gorgeous body. I agree shed look like a holocaust survivor. Not hot.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Halle Berry is engaged...and an Oscar winner...And she's got a rockin' bod, fer sher...I have no idea about the dude and if he has kids...and I'm too lazy to even look it up...

    AJ is so thin, I can't see her having the strength to even do a lap in the pool. I love her, but I wish she'd eat a hamburger...

    ReplyDelete
  32. Sorry can't be Jolie, 10 years old boy! That is just creepy. I picture the son mentioned to be at least a teenagers. If not, this thought/image needs to be eradicated from my brain.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Speaking of the Leg, I laugh every time I see a piece of news about her where the editors choose to use a shot of her in that dress and flashing her leg instead of any of the millions of other pics they could have slapped on the article. Makes my day.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hilary Swank

    http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2009/10/09/hilary_swank_walks_around_naked_in_front

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Eve,

    Plenty of narcissists get involved in charities because it makes them look good. I throw Flubber Lips into that same camp. There are plenty of celebrities who offer their time and money without looking for accolades. Stick around and read some of the Blind Items - Kindness posts if you think everyone else in Hollywood but good ol' Flubber is self involved. You will be pleasantly surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Supapimp, auntliddy and NYer, right on!

    Everyone else, raise your hand if you've ever visited a refugee camp? OK, and how many of you gave 30% of your income to charity in the last couple of years? Any takers?

    I think her motives are good, but even if they're as you say, at least she's lifting a finger to help strangers who need it. I hope every last one of you can say you do the same.

    And so what if it's a gossip site. I love CDAN, Ent, and gossip -- this is just my opinion on Angie.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Lurky Loo, I love the kindness BIs, but how many of them are sustained over 10 years? And sometimes getting out and giving a cause publicity helps more than a quiet act of kindness. Sometimes a public face is what an important cause needs. I think it takes stones to take on a responsibility like that.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I read a Hilary Swank interview where she said she sleeps naked, and that the b/f child is in the house. Maybe..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is that so shocking? I grew up having to knock on my parents door because that was their room where they do "adult" things that include being naked. I now run my house the same way.

      Delete
    2. Is that so shocking? I grew up having to knock on my parents door because that was their room where they do "adult" things that include being naked. I now run my house the same way.

      Delete
    3. Is that so shocking? I grew up having to knock on my parents door because that was their room where they do "adult" things that include being naked. I now run my house the same way.

      Delete
  39. This blind is not about the UN or charity work. It is about a woman swimming naked.
    I reckon it is Angelina. She probably thinks it's 'European'.
    10/ 11/ 12 year old boys would look too. They don't have to be teenagers.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I do not think this is AJ... because without the help of hollywood makeup and lighting tricks during her nude scenes she would be scared about revealing her needle marks. She has had a smack addiction since her twenties. She takes the synthetic heroin pill dilaudid as well but the needle is what makes her the happiest. Its the rush I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  41. If Hilary Swank is engaged, that story that jcor posted is your answer.

    Hilary grew up 'country', she might have a lot of skinny-dipping experience!


    Re:Brad & Angie:
    I think it's natural for people to hate the kids everyone says are on top--most famous, most beautiful, etc. It's natural, but it's really not healthy. It just reminds me of hipster irony...."I'm such a non-conformist, I hate them the MOST"...etc. It just gets ridiculous how invested some people are in tearing them down. About every.single.thing. No matter what anyone's motive is in charity, the RESULTS should be the focus, regardless. Some can't see anything through their shit-colored glasses, KWIM?

    A lot of that in society these days. Just my observations.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Betty White!

    Ok, I seriously have no idea but I know it's def not Angie.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @eve- that 30% donation is a much needed tax write off...just sayin'. she benefits from more than just the pr

    ReplyDelete
  44. We tithe 34% of our money. No wait, that's taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I really don't care what AJ's motives are. A good act is a good act and she does a hell of a lot more for the world than I do.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Argh!! The Leg's well publicized donations are tax write offs. I bet Angie the earth mother showers with her kids but she's probably too smart to swim nude where she can be photographed. She's smarter than that. If Hilary Swank's engaged, I like her for this blind.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Most 10 year old boys are not into girls and don't yet ogle a woman's body. In a few years, yes. Can't be AJ. btw I also think her motives are, heads of states and such say she is extremely knowledgable about the issues she sponsors, which she wouldn't be if it was only for public.

    ReplyDelete
  48. "She actually puts her money where her mouth is, giving away a third of her income"

    Perhaps she feels she deserves a nude swim. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Um, @msgirl, are you male? Because I grew up a tomboy and can tell you that the BULK of 9, 10, 11 and 12 year old boys are fascinated with nude pics of women!
    They awaken sexually early with erections beginning as early as six or seven. And some of my friends began successfully masturbating by 12. Can totally be friends Pax and Maddox's ages.

    ReplyDelete
  50. cant be Angie - everyone knows the jolie-pitt kids dont' have friends :D

    ReplyDelete
  51. Erin - no but I have a son! At that age none of his friends were interested. I do know in another year I caught him on the Maxim web site. He developed quite early too.

    But then again, he's quite good at sneaking things, ha, so maybe stuff was going on BEFORE I saw him cruising Maxim. One thing I did note is that he seemed to like big asses HAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  52. @msgirl, funny! Most of my buddies were boob men. It was the thrill of taboo. Obviously, most may not have fully understood their sexuality yet, but I'm amazed at how early kids can get interested in sexual organs and such.
    And really, I was no different. At an early age, I was super curious about mens' bodies. In my adult years, I've seen several wangs and still am entertained by them. For different reasons though... :)

    ReplyDelete
  53. I don't think Hillary. Does she have any kids? It says "their" kids, not her fiance/bf's kids.

    My first thought was Angelina. Not a fan of hers. And I've always thought it was nothing but PR to go from the vial of blood wearing craziness while married to Billy Bob to St. Angelina. Really? She needed to clean up her image.

    It's one thing to teach your own to not be ashamed of nudity (whether I agree with it or not). But you really need to throw a bathing suit on when the friends are over.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Just to clarify, I agree with not being ashamed of nudity. Just there needs to be a cut off when walking around naked in front of kids.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Maddox doesnt have friends, they move constantly. None of the kids have friends except each other.
    Also just to set the record straight, AJ doesnt shoot up anymore, shes addicted to pain killers, the patch kind.
    NE blinds are made up lies. They had her in mind when they made it up. I think there was some true story about her and Brad skinny dipping after the kids are in bed and they stretched that.

    ReplyDelete
  56. I have 4 brothers and a rediculous amount of male cousins and believe me they ALL liked naked women by the age of 10. My brother even had a little business going with my dad's 'lady mags' He would charge his 10 0r 11 year old pals for a sneaky look.
    They were fascinated.
    Swimming naked is not wrong, but when kids that aren't yours are around cover it up.

    ReplyDelete
  57. I missed most of these comments so excuse me if this has already been said.

    We need to know how old the kids are and if the actress is even aware they are watching. For all we know she is swimming and the kids are peeking from a window. Plus this is the National enquirer, it is probably total BS.
    Regardless. I prefer to swim nude and do so in front of my kids. I would not in front of their friends because I don't want to offend parents but some people don't feel
    the need to bend to societal norms.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Can't be Hilary, she doesn't have any kids.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I'm coming to this discussion late, but I want to say I agree that Angelina Jolie does do good. I have dedicated the last 16 years of my life working in the world of refugee resettlement (before that I was in the entertainment industry). I know a lot of people who work in the camps overseas. Yes, Angie does good. She pays all of her own expenses and those of everyone who travels with her (not an entourage, usually family or people with a specialty needed on the trip--medical, etc.). She does actual work when she's in the camps. Most of the work she does in the field is not photographed or done in front of any camera. Going into the camps and spending time there is nasty, dirty, work. Few celebrities will even venture into that realm (Mia Farrow spends a tremendous amount of time working with UNHCR, as does George Clooney). They do good work. You may not like them as people, but they really are doing good work. UNHCR oversees operations to assist nearly ten million people a year on a budget smaller than the annual budget of the New York City department of sanitation. UNHCR is not corrupt. They need all the celebrity exposure they can get. Most goodwill ambassadors serve for no more than a year and then bail out. Angie has been at it since 2001, and has spent months out of each year working for the cause (and actually working with UNHCR, not just taking pictures). I know people around the world working with refugees, including many who are onsite in places like Darfur and the Kenya-Somalia border. They have only good things to say about Ms. Jolie. Believe me, they have no time to or interest in sucking up to posers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad to see your post May. I know those conditions can't be good. I also can't believe AJ continues to do this. I don't think I could. It's hard to see so many people suffer up close and personal. I feel AJ is doing good for altruistic reasons.

      Delete
  60. "My first thought was Angelina. Not a fan of hers. And I've always thought it was nothing but PR to go from the vial of blood wearing craziness while married to Billy Bob to St. Angelina. Really? She needed to clean up her image. "

    Really??? Crazy Chica

    In an early interview she said when she filmed Tomb Raiders in Cambodia the poverty shocked her and that's when she began her charity work and adopted Maddox.

    I prefer to see the good she does and applaud her than make up bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Y'know, just because she says she donates a third of her income to charity, doesn't mean she actually does. I had always called bullshit on that.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Lola its documented by many charities exactly how much she gives.

    http://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/2-angelina-jolie

    ReplyDelete
  63. Ok, so back to the blind. I wanted to want Hilary Swank for this, but her boyfriend (not engaged as far as I see) isn't an actor. He's an agent.
    I can't think of any other couples who fit the blind's details so exactly. Gotta be Ang.

    ReplyDelete
  64. One of the first things 10year old boys do is learn how to spell "BOOB" with numbers. They may not know what they are, but they know they are supposed to like them.

    ReplyDelete
  65. There is no financial transparency, and there is a complete lack of accountability when it comes to "charitable donations" and this situation.

    "Looktothestars.org" is not a verifiable source of anything. It is run by publicists.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Agent there are heaps of websites, I just grabbed one of the many. Google for yourself, but I find it easier to believe she is altruistic, than to think that all of these reputable world wide charities would lie on her behalf and say she gave when she didn't. No one travels the world going to the awful places she does 'just for the publicity'

    ReplyDelete
  67. whadabout Catherine Zeta Jones....I know she's married to her grand daddy, but she has had lots of surgery and seems to think she hot...

    sons too....

    ReplyDelete
  68. Thank you @Gabi. Exactly who I was thinking. She's been a little off the rails lately, no?

    ReplyDelete
  69. @astro, it's not about her, it's about money, "philanthropy" in the 21st century and how it is driven by publicity and for personal gain when it comes to the celebrity part of it. I am very familiar with the UN and the subject of alleged charity. I choose to believe what I have seen and reviewed. It's the phoniness of it that repulses me in her case:)

    ReplyDelete
  70. @May: I read your profile and we have very similar tastes in music, movies and books. Thanks for your information on those who actually DO do what they say. I'm on the fence about Jolie. Half of me says it's PR and the other half wants to believe she's genuwine.
    And I think for this blind it could be CZJ and not any of the popular guesses.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Sally Field. Her kids' friends are 35, and that's the problem. They really, really like her.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Leann Rimes is loony enough to do this.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Just for the record, the Jolie-Pitt kids DO have friends. They have playdates with Gwen stefanis kids, for example, as there are photos of Angelina and the kids leaving Gwen's house in London after one of them. I know I've read about them hanging out with other celebrities' kids too. Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days