Sunday, February 12, 2012

Nicole Scherzinger Is Wearing No Pants


I don't know if Nicole Scherzinger wanted to make it easy if she got frisked going through security or if she prefers wearing nothing when she flies overseas, but the woman is wearing no pants. Are these leggings but see through? It's like she could not make up her mind what to wear over it and finally talked herself into the fact that she looked just find without anything over it so went for it.

17 comments:

  1. I can't decide what the lace part is above the tights. Mini skirt, booty shorts, thigh highs???

    ReplyDelete
  2. Or is it those tights that have a thicker decoration at the top? Seen those a lot lately.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ^or "are they those tights". I can speak English, really I can.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think its what EmEyeKay said....it would be my luck to spring a run in them if I wore them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. They're tights with decoration at the top.

    God, she's in need of some attention. This is just a LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEE outfit. She had her 15 minutes, and is trying to get more time. Stop trying so hard, Nicole.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Not that she doesn't look great but that's hardly appropriate for a public flight. Hey Nicole, ditch the hat and don a skirt for crissake!

    ReplyDelete
  7. At least Xtina's leggings she wears on the daily are opaque- these things are tights with control top lace- plain and simple!

    Inappropriate and attention seeking in a desperate Paris/Lindsay way. Yuck.

    Oh, and the hat looks ridic with that ensemble. Michael Jackson's corpse can rock that hat better than this trick.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Didn't a lady get kicked off a plane for wearing something not even close to that revealing? She is a no talent slutbag. give it up you desperate loser.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Jasmine: lolololololol, 3rd line of your comment. so true! Thrillerrrrr

    ReplyDelete
  10. The girls do this at the college campus I work on. It drives me INSANE. Pantyhose are not pants. Tights aren't pants. Leggings can only be "pants" under an over-sized sweater or shirt.

    This look isn't hot. You will always end up with that 'holy shit, I forgot my pants' look.

    ReplyDelete
  11. you left a dude's house who you can't remember his name and couldn't find your pants either... this look should be called "the walk of shame"...the sunglasses and hat you took from his house so no one would recognize who u are on your walk back to the dorms.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Off Topic: It must be KILLING Enty that he/she/whatever can't post about the K family. Did anyone else see that asshole Kim in every single photo at the Clive Davis party like it was all about HER? She didn't give a shit that someone just died, bitch ain't giving up the photo op with her boobs spilling out of her dress.

    And WTF was she doing there anyway?!

    ReplyDelete
  13. YourNameHere - March is only a few days away now. Please try to hold yourself. Please.

    I can't fault her if she's flying. If it's a f-u to security then good for her.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I clearly see shorts in that picture.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8:52 AM

    It's not that bad and let's face it, not as obscene as Xtina because, well, Nicole has the body for it. Just looks like she's wearing panty hose and booty shorts to me. Nothing controversial here.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't think there's anything about this outfit worth reporting. It looks fine and this article is a waste of space.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days