Monday, February 20, 2012

Jennifer Aniston Pulls Topless Scene...Again


You may recall that when Jennifer Aniston shot the movie The Breakup, there was a scene where she appeared topless. At the last second she had the scene pulled, but some prints were released and then there was a huge controversy as she had her lawyers send cease and desist letters to everyone on earth who dared publish the photos. Well, for her new film Wanderlust she also decided to go ahead and pose topless then she went and got a boyfriend who saw her topless in the movie but decided he did not want to share her naked breasts with anyone else in the world so Jennifer has had the scene edited so that her boyfriend can keep them to himself. The problem is she decided at the last minute again so everyone has been scrambling to make the changes she requires. I don't care if she shows her breasts or not, but it seems to me you could give everyone a little more notice each time so they don't have all this stress about trying to make a cut and a change to a movie that is about to be released.


25 comments:

  1. What's the big deal Jen? Flaunt 'um while ya got 'um!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Does she not remember when some paparazzo took pictures of her sunbathing topless. Honey, we've seen 'em. You're in your 40s, flaunt 'em if they're fabulous.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From what I understand the change wasn't that "last minute." I personally think it was put out there in the media to hype the movie with no intention of showing it that way in the end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ^Wait, wasn't this the exact same thing for Horrible Bosses too? She was supposed to be topless in that as well and then it got pulled?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous6:41 AM

    I'd love to have the kind of clout where I could demand something like that at the last second.

    Didn't she appear topless in The Good Girl?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sure- Flaunt'em while you have 'em. BUT if you have the clout, do things your way! This is one of the benefits of being an A-lister.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I hope it's not true (the last-minute part), I like Jen. Never got the impression she'd hide her boobs for a guy. Maybe I'm completely off.

    ITMeantime, WHAT are they holding?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm with CarrieL on this one. All for hype.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If you don't want a topless scene, can't that be written into the contract? Is she really that much of a prude?

    ReplyDelete
  10. we already saw her boobs in The Good Girl. They are nice boobs but nothing to write home about.

    Jen just doesn't have the balls to go edgy. She wants to be vanilla. It is just who she is. No matter how hard she chamelons to each boyfriend. She.isn't.edgy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jen has an amazing body, trust me this has nothing to do with the boyfriend.
    Has anyone else read the blind I think it was on AGC
    about a boyfriend of a big star not happy because the relationship hasn't gotten him lots of work, has exhausted her friends and contacts and might be getting ready to move on ?

    ReplyDelete
  12. You can't make cuts "last minute". Final delivery before the answer print of a film is made is months before the theatrical release date. If she agreed contractually to have nudity apart of her scenes only the studio execs who give final approval before the MPAA final rating is issued can decide a scene needs to be cut. Considering the amount of nudity in the film, the scene was probably cut because it simply didn't work. No more, no less. Come on, don't make her out to being some over the top diva.nshe doesn't have enough clout for studio execs to fear her, and very few people do these days.

    ReplyDelete
  13. What on earth are they holding in that photo? Twigs and lemon rinds?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'd much rather talk about Paul Rudd. The man is such a cutie.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ Mango - I googled it...

    Dried orange peels make better kindling than small sticks or twigs. The citrus oil keeps them burning longer, in addition to adding a scent to your fire.

    ReplyDelete
  16. We've seen them before as mentioned above in The Good Girl and I'm pretty sure she did some magazine photo spread where nothing was left to the imagination. Who cares? They are just breasts and she has nice ones to boot. Go for it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous9:02 AM

    I thought she had gotten a very.very good.boob job about the time.Marley.and,me and.her.GQ shot.came,out

    ReplyDelete
  18. Could be that her implants are giving her problems. Or maybe this is all a publicity stunt and she never intended to be topless in the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yeah, jeebus. Who cares. This is just getting people all riled up wondering "what Jen's tits look like?" BFD. We all got 'em, lady. Yours can't be THAT GD special.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Oh please does showing your boobs mean her movies will not be Flops LOL. All her movies are Flops whether she shows her boobs or not LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  21. she's in her 40s, maybe the boobs don't look so great anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's ALL fake. They started running the ads that make it look like she flashes a bunch of campers, then decided they had to have a story for the audience on why the money shot isn't in there. It's always fake.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I wouldn't worry about it. I doubt many people will be seeing that file anyway. The previews look as dumb as all her other movies.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Well, I wouldn't mind at all if Jen did a real honest-to-God topless scene. Call me crazy if you must, but I think she's gorgeous. And no, what she did in "The Good Girl" doesn't count.

    But the movie itself looks outrageously terrible, and in the context of Jen's career that's definitely saying a lot. I really wish I could understand why she keeps making such stupid movies. Is she really that dumb or that lacking in taste? And why do studios keep paying her? Nobody even goes to see her movies anymore do they? Is she sleeping with half of the execs in Hollywood or something? The mystery of Jennifer Aniston's career is a case that would baffle Sherlock Holmes himself.

    ReplyDelete