I remember back in the day when Kim Kardashian appeared in Playboy I got my hands on some of her photos before maybe they were supposed to be out and Playboy shut down my site for six hours before I could have someone run over to the Playboy Mansion and get Hef a year's supply of little blue pills.
Well, times have changed now. Lindsay Lohan's issue was not supposed to come out until next week, but the photos all leaked so Hugh and Playboy just decided to release the issue early. Do you think they could have been behind this whole thing? Kind of convenient to only have the cover leak and then a few days later have the photos leak. You know whoever had access to the cover had access to the photos inside. Why didn't they do both? Why did they wait? Hugh knows what I know that everyone has seen Lindsay naked. So, in order to spice things up and try and get his $1M back, they play a little marketing game. If you want to have your retinas burning all day you can click here and see Lindsay in all her nakedness.
I know they're Photoshopped to bits, but i quite like some of the pictures, and they're pretty classy considering how bad they could've been!
ReplyDeleteA red-blooded sex-always-on-the-mind male in my fb feed posted these and the conversation among him and his friends is "nope," "never in a million years," "not with a borrowed johnson."
ReplyDeleteBeyond being photoshopped to death, the pictures overall are really terrible compared to most layouts, which makes me wonder how bad the first set were that were deemed so bad they had to be reshot. Some of Playboys pictorials are really stunning. None of that appears in any of Lindsay's photos. Just a desperate-to-look-like-Marilyn woman writhing around. Sad.
ReplyDeleteThe PhotoShop job on her breasts doesn't even match from one pic to the next. Especially when you look at the last.
ReplyDelete(and yes, I'm ashamed that i know this)
I don't think it's that great a spread. I'm glad it's not full of 'nasty'. The cover is boring and I think they could have lifted her boobs a bit--they look saggy for a woman of 25. There are a couple of good pics of her but overall it's meh.
ReplyDeleteno where in that photo shoot did i see THE CRACKEN..so photoshopped HELL to the Ya.
ReplyDeleteAnd who in their right mind wants to have a fantasy about Lindsay ? I bet you can catch something just by looking
ReplyDeleteFor 1M $, I expected more...she looks 'meh'. Hope she, Dina and Ali spend their money wisely....aaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahaha
ReplyDeletejesus did they really do that? lol.
ReplyDeleteThey already pulled them from that site. I doubt I missed much from the sound of it!
ReplyDeleteunoriginal, zero personality
ReplyDeleteI couldn't see them either. They had Hughs face all over them by the time I got there. But by what everyone is saying that may be an improvement.
ReplyDeleteI'm not saying that playboy didn't leak the photos. I just don't see how they would make money from leaking the photos. it would seem that if people can see them for free on the interweb, then they wouldn't go out and buy the magazine. [insert joke about getting playboy only to read the articles here.]
ReplyDeleteHer face didn't even look like her, it looked like a cartoon. How embarrassing for her.
ReplyDeleteThere is a link over on dlisted that will take you to the photos.
ReplyDeleteFunny a friend of mine posted on FB about how gorgeous she is and everyone agreed that she had great t*ts. I just de-friended him.
I wonder if the actual issue will have a different set of photos? Maybe this is all for publicity, thus, 2 photoshoots.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if the actual issue will have a different set of photos? Maybe this is all for publicity, thus, 2 photoshoots.
ReplyDeleteThis is such a sad pictoral. I havent seen too many of them but are they all so... sad?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThese pictures fucking blow. I had zero expectations that they would be any good and yet somehow they managed to be even worse than that.
ReplyDeleteGreat idea putting her in a red backdrop that looks like the weird room with the dancing backwards talking dwarf from Twin Peaks.
You know Lindsay thinks that this is what's finally going to get her that big Hollywood comeback she desperately wants and that once directors and producers see these photos the offers will just come pouring in right away. Only problem with that plan is that after next week Hollywood shuts down for the holidays and remains shut down until the first week of the new year. So the natural thing to do was leak the photos the week before the industry went on vacation. And one only needs to guess who did indeed leak these photos today. I'm not saying who did it - but I'm pretty sure her name rhymes with Flina Blowman.
Could the magazine have had insurance against leaks or something and the pics were so bad they decided to try and collect on it?
ReplyDeleteIn half the pictures, she doesn't even look like herself. I thought she was wearing giant wax lips in a couple of them.
ReplyDeleteKnowing how Playboy works, or at least used to prior to this new age of whoredom where everyone and thing is on sale, I would say that staff from Playboy did not leak the pics. Prior to publication, mock ups in magazine form are sent to the people of the subject for "final approval" - Uncle Hugh gets what he wants, so this is usually just a courtesy so the star can see. I am pretty certain that Lindsay's people leaked them. Playboy has nothing but serious money to lose on their biggest issue of the year, so 99.9% that Playboy is not the source.
ReplyDeleteAs for the pics, saw them late last night and not on a device that showed great detail, so they looked okay ... certainly not great given some of the spreads I saw in my youth.
Sadly, I had no interest in seeing Lindsey naked. And I love naked woman. She is a lost soul that evokes pity, not lust.
ReplyDeletethe pictures are boring, the ones she did pretending to be Marilyn topless a few years ago were better.
ReplyDeleteI still think her boobs are real by the way they sag down. If they are fake, she should get a refund on droopy implants.
At least Lindsay wasn't forced to do this. The woman loves to be naked and ooogled.
I also have a hard time believing that Playboy intentionally leaked the photos. How are they going to get the money they paid LiLo back if everyone has already seen the photos by the time the issue goes on sale? There would be no reason to buy the issue, assuming one was only going to buy it to see LiLo. I've seen them all, and personally I think there are some of the worst looking that Playboy has published: Lilo trying to summon her inner "movie sex goddess" while wearing bad wigs and with bright red puffy lips.
ReplyDeleteUsually when you pull your hands up, your boobs look higher than they are. And Lindsay's are saggy even though her hands are up on the majority of pictures
ReplyDeleteSaw a comment elsewhere so I went and checked on it, her nipples do change size dramatically in some shots.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI came across a link one time that showed vintage pics of old Playboys. The women in those pics were beautiful, slightly flawed, but REAL. You could see pores and body hair and their skin looked like skin. I'm not saying Lindsay looks bad - for being 5% reality and devoid of personality, the pics are okay. This is not really how she looks in the flesh, though.
ReplyDeleteI imagine men, and some women buy Playboy to see naked flesh. This is not naked flesh. It is virtual reality, and if you're going to Photoshop someone to this extent, you may as well design your own woman on the rendering software they have out these days. From scratch, not from this girl. If you had any doubts she did this solely for the money, look at her face in these pics. It's very telling, and sad.
With all the free porn available on the 'net these days, why in the world would anyone pay five bucks to see this plastic hag on paper? Or anyone else, for that matter?
ReplyDeleteThe death knell is ringing for Playboy.
This might not be a total loss for Playboy. They do feature a 20 Questions article with Nick Offerman. So there's at least one interesting thing in this issue.
ReplyDeleteI am curious how this could be a marketing ploy since, in essence, everyone has already seen the "goods". She looks pretty used and abused, but I am sure than 99% of guys would say they would still throw it in her.
ReplyDeleteI think people would rather see Hef naked than Lindsey. He's held up better.
ReplyDeleteJasonBlueEyes, as if I didn't already love you enough, you're a Twin Peaks fan too? You rock.
ReplyDeleteOh, and the guy who leaked the photos was a Russian hacker who has done this kind of thing many times before. I could see Playboy doing this on purpose, but I don't think they actually did.
ReplyDeleteYes, Mooshki - I love Twin Peaks. I think it's one of the 5 best shows ever. You rock too.
ReplyDelete"looks like the weird room with the dancing backwards talking dwarf from Twin Peaks."
ReplyDeleteJason - I can't believe you said this! Exactly what I thought when I saw the cover. What a horrible choice for PB. I can't believe they did this. Very tacky.
What a let down. I want pubes! I want pubes! Her tats are a great feature why airbrush them out?
ReplyDelete