Yeah, so the Lindsay Lohan Playboy cover leaked. Yawn. Please people of the internet you act like you have never seen this woman naked. Google Lindsay Lohan naked but do so carefully, because you might get Michael Lohan mesh photos in your mix and I do not want any of you to go blind. The woman has been naked, partially naked or wearing see thru clothes ever since she was 18. So, what is that? Like 20 years ago. She is in her mid 30's right? Well the inside of her body probably is, if not older.
Lindsay Lohan calls herself an actress. What is the last thing she acted in? And since she had to do this shoot twice, apparently she is not even very good at posing naked.
If you look at the cover though, there is one interesting thing to be noted. It appears that not only does Playboy have the 25 best cocktails, but also an article about when Steve Jobs met Andy Warhol. Now that would be a pretty cool meeting, but it would have been a much better meeting if Steve Jobs had been at his peak too when they met.
For the first time ever, an issue of Playboy will be bought for the articles!
ReplyDeleteAnd a deceased Steve Jobs will always, always, be more interesting and read worthy than a naked Lohan. Always!
i have 7 men on my facebook account who already posted about this. there are some men out there that really want to see this, Enty. but i agree. why. who hasn't seen this chick naked already?
ReplyDeleteI'm sure it was "leaked" by Dina.
ReplyDeleteI agree with The Bitch - Dina is behind the "leak". Is it just me or does Lindsay look half baked?
ReplyDeleteI would die for a special-edition Andy Warhol iPhone/Pod/Pad/Mac, iAnything!
ReplyDeleteI'd like an iLindsayBan. This trick gets enough attention from every other website as it is.
ReplyDeleteI'm just curious as to who the people are that keep her relevant enough for her to constantly be in the gossip blogs. I usually skip over the Lindsay stuff and go straight to the comments, because the comments are way more interesting than Lindsay.
ReplyDeleteThe Kardashians are more relevant than LiLo. Yawn.
ReplyDeleteI disagree, NotSoAnonMom. At least at one point Lindsay was an actress. The Kardassians are based on nothing more than a bad sex tape.
ReplyDelete@Mooshki, so true! We tend to forget that Lilo was relevant, and was a child actor once with a lot of potential.
ReplyDeleteWhile the Kraps!! Well, they made it because of Kim's sex tape. No pissing contest here!
Sadly, she looks like a cheap ho on the cover. Apparently no artful nudity is to be found here.
ReplyDeleteCookie time!
ReplyDeleteMs snarky, I think Playboy has been getting almost Hustler-ish for a while now. Nothing artsy has been about their magazine in a long time.
Oddly enough, the articles are getting more interesting.
For some reason "She is in her mid 30's right? Well the inside of her body probably is" struck me as really gross. It makes sense, it's just sorta icky.
ReplyDeleteAnd I actually sort of do want to see these pics. Only because I'm convinced they snuck in Ali somewhere and her skinny ass is in the background, poised as a tree or something. Also, since this was an 'homage' to MM, I think it'll be hilarious to see Lindsay contorting herself to attempt to exhibit some of the effortless classy that MM had.
I totally want to see these!!! I'm not gay but hey, might as well be.
ReplyDeleteI love the new pic jasmine, best thing i've seen all day!
ReplyDeleteOh, and also - the cover is an "homage" to the first African American to be on the cover of Playboy .
ReplyDeleteLohan is pure class.
She reminds me of Courtney Stoddard in that picture.
ReplyDeleteI remember seeing pictures of her whole kit and caboodle a few years back - nothin' special, men. But I bet this issue sells well. People love a naked trainwreck.
ReplyDeleteI've seen enough of the cover here to know she needs a refund for those boobs.
ReplyDeleteVIPblonde: Here is a Warhol something for your Iphone:
http://tinyurl.com/c3behk3
Merry Christmas!
Very classy
ReplyDeleteI am optimistic that this will be Playboy's worst-selling issue ever, thus dropping Lindsay's asking price to, well, $0.00.
ReplyDeleteFirecrotch!
ReplyDeleteHey, at least they didn't cleverly hide the Playboy bunny so that if I do see the cover in person, I'm not tempted to scour it for the bunny (I love when it's hard to find).
You're one step closer to that Oscar, Lindsay. One step closer.
ReplyDeleteA cheap, old pulp fiction cover would be classier than this. She's not posed very well, either. It's sad - she wanted to win an Oscar, but now she's doing this. I'm not putting down the nudity thing, but if you want to win an Oscar, you study your craft and work hard - you don't fall into the pitfalls of easy money and famewhoring.
ReplyDeleteI think this may be her last chance to earn a large payout. After this she has nothing but porn for a paycheck.
ReplyDeletelol JasonBlueEyes!
ReplyDelete