Jerry Sandusky's daughter-in-law has come forward accusing her father-in-law of molesting one of her children. So, you know if he found one grandson attractive he probably did something to all of them. The thing is none of them would be related by blood because all his kids were adopted. It is kind of like the Woody Allen situation except his wife was his daughter and she was older. Also, more parents are now coming forward to say that one school routinely let Sandusky come on the school grounds and take their kids off school grounds with no parental permission or notification. So, the local schools were also complicit in letting the molestation go on. Seriously, wtf is wrong with this town? It is like they were offering up sacrifices to someone.
Why the hell did she wait until now?
ReplyDeleteWhat does it matter if the kids were adopted or not Enty?
ReplyDeleteWho the hell *is* writing this blog? The old Enty was so much more evolved.
Ya, Sandusky needs to be strung up & stretched.
Mygeorgie,
ReplyDeleteLately the posts are less than lackluster. It is clearly not the same person if you look at the earlier posts.
As an adoptive mother of 3 children, I am offended that this would be mentioned in this article. Should adopted children being molested be more acceptable because there is no blood relation??? Yikes!!!
ReplyDeleteThis is just so disgusting.
ReplyDeleteI think all Enty's saying is that it doesn't qualify as incest since they weren't related by blood. Or does it, if children are adopted? Hmm. I wonder.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how many victims there will be by the time this all shakes out. Terrifying.
Someone needed to end this SOB's ability to harm a child. Too bad someone didn't take him deer hunting and have an accident.
ReplyDelete" I triped and the gun went off and shot him in the groin. Whoops, my bad."
I said since the beginning, more and more people would come forward - this has been going on since the 70's by one account. Would not be surprised if the number of victims tops 100. I'm sure some parents, or children who are now adults, are hestitant to come forward because of the possibility of exposure. I just saw last night where one victim had his identity protected because he was a minor, but instead of reporting his name, the paper reported his parents name, his school, and all kinds of personal information about the kid. Knowing how some of these victims sometimes feel ashamed, I'm sure some will never say anything. Hope this guy rots in hell. But I also predicted they will find Sandusky in his garage with the door closed and his car running soon, you know, since he got out on bail without having to even pay any money because the judge in his case was also a volunteer at his kid's charity camp. Ugh.
ReplyDeleteIn order for me to pick up a nephew at school my sister had to call in her permission, describe my car, I had to have a certain placard displayed and the kid had to say I was the right person.
ReplyDeleteSandusky will not commit suicide because it seems that he does not comprehend that he has done anything wrong. He is a truly sick fuck (I rarely use this term).
ReplyDeleteIt would appear that we are seeing the true life definition of 'a company town'. Sandusky was a part of the power structure, Penn State Football, and because of that, he was allowed to get away with behavior that should have sent red flags up all over the place. I agree that many more victims will come forward, but I am now beginning to wonder if this will blow the lid off other things that may have been going in that town, other things that people associated with the university have been allowed to get away with.
I'm thinking the adoption part was mentioned due to possibly being part of this creep's thought process/justification of his actions--"well, they're adopted, so they're not REALLY related to me, so it's not incest," hence the Woody Allen reference. And yes, in the sense, the town would have been offering up sacrifices, since we know just how big a deal Penn State football is in that areas, the team being far more important than some kid, or even a bunch of kids. (I'd be willing to bet most of the kids he went after were poor/minorities/from troubled families, so if they said anything it would be easier to paint them as liars. Pedophiles are sneaky like that...)
ReplyDeleteIt is absolutely incest, they are his children's children. They are related. An adopted child is just as much family as a biological one.
ReplyDeleteThis man is so disgusting. If he is a college football coach why did he have access to so many young children? I'm not familiar with him so I didn't hear about this until monster until recently.
How has his wife not filed for divorce from this monster? I know how deceptive pedophiles are so I am not saying she knew or let it happen to stay married.
ReplyDeleteBut come on, stand up for yourself woman and walk away.
Isn't this a violation of reporting ethics? Usually the media goes overboard not to identify underage victims. In mentioning daughter in law, adopted etc you are identifying the victims. Normally the media just references "a family member" and leaves it at that. Also the daughter in law seems to be publicly identifying her children as victims. That doesn't strike me as a normal maternal instinct.
ReplyDeleteWhat is wrong with this town? I think it all comes down to money. And greed--no matter WHO gets hurt. I can't believe no one ever took this to the media before...sad and disgusting.
ReplyDeleteRose, he had a charity called Second Mile that was a foundation for at risk youth. That is where he found his victims - they were all young, white, from poor single family homes, and yes, he chose the types of unstable kids that no one would believe and the types that would be so grateful for his attention and extravagant gifts that they would never speak up.
ReplyDeleteDave, this is the only place where I've seen such specific info. All the reports I saw yesterday just said 'underage family member' so you could easily surmise it was a grandchild or grandnephew. Sandusky has 5 sons, I think, so it would take some digging to narrow it down if no one in the family or CPS is being specific.
Maybe the daughter-in-law is just now coming forward because her kids just admitted it to her????
ReplyDelete@Jessica - I said the same thing here a few weeks ago - at least 100 victims. And I still think he'll be dead by Christmas - suicide or an "accident". Preferably an extremely painful "accident".
ReplyDeleteI agree with Robin, the mention of the kids being adopted was a speculation of how Sandusky's thought process worked as to why it would be okay for him to molest his own grandchildren. I'll bet Enty's right about it, too.
ReplyDeleteThere's no way Sandusky's wife didn't know he was a closet- case pedophile.
ReplyDeleteoh no I want him to go to jail for a long long time. Let the prisoners teach him a lesson on how they treat rapists and pedophiles.
ReplyDeleteI know you can't resist a chance to make a typically distorted reference about Woody Allen, but do you really think that Woody and Soon-yi (whose relationship has lasted more than 20 years now) is the equivalent of a child being molested by his grandfather? What's next? Falling for the "it was just horseplay in the shower" line?
ReplyDeleteSick. Just sick.
ReplyDeleteI can't wrap my mind around how fucked up it is that you'd compare the Woody Allen situation to the Sandusky one.
ReplyDeleteLOL@ Buckwald VonSnide....
ReplyDelete@Icecat -- why is that funny? Soon-Yi was a GROWN woman who entered into that relationship WILLINGLY. I'm not saying that scenario wasn't messed up, but it's not as if Woody was raping dozens of ten year-olds in a public shower. Jeez.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the others that suspect that other crimes have been covered up at Penn U, where anything seems to be A-OK long as you're involved with football.
ReplyDeleteAs for the Woody Allen reference, I totally agree with the parallels. Woody is the father of three of his wife's half-siblings, and got "involved" with Soon-Yi while he was still with Mia.
Who knows how old Soon-Yi was when Woody first made a move on her; it might very well have been years before Mia discovered their sexual relationship.
During subsequent custody battle between Mia and Woody about their shared three children, Mia filed charges that Woody molested their 7-year-old daughter Dylan. (She even walked on him masturbating over pictures of the young girl, yuck.) Connecticut State Attorney Frank Maco announced that, while he had "probable cause" to prosecute Allen on charges of sexual molestation of Dylan, he was dropping the case to spare her the trauma of appearing in court.
Frankly, I can't believe that Woody was allowed to adopt even more children. I hope for the sake of his youngest daughters that he's impotent these days.
@Violet -- Ick. The Soon-Yi thing has always been gross, even if the sex was consensual (which is why I think that situation is different from what happened at Penn State). But honestly, I had NO idea about those incidents involving Dylan. :-(
ReplyDeletePart of me also thinks that it was a pretty nasty divorce, and that Woody and Mia give off crazy vibes, so who really knows who was telling the truth? Unless the kids choose to make a statement, I'm reluctant to believe Woody OR Mia.
I also take offense to Ent's notion that adopted kids aren't biological, and thus can't be victims of incest. That's bullshit. It's the very worst violation of trust, any way you look at it.
@Buckwald VonSnide
ReplyDeleteThere's no question that Mia and Woody's breakup was nasty. Then again, I can't blame her -- finding out the father of some of her children was having an affair with one daughter and molesting another is seriously f*cked up. In Mia's shoes, I would've been tempted to castrate Woody for touching my kids.
It's pretty clear from the Connecticut State Attorney's official statement that Woody did molest his 7-year-old daughter, so he may very well have gotten sexual with Soon-Yi when she was still a minor because Soon-Yi was only about 10 or so when Woody and Mia first got together.
I agree that it doesn't matter when the family relationship is due to blood ties or adoption. Possibly the reason Enty brought it up is that pedophiles like Sandusky and Woody might use the lack of biological ties to excuse their acts. But the bottom line is that grown men should NEVER touch children in a sexual way.
I am so, so angry with all the people at Penn U that enabled Sandusky to get away with abusing all those children. Especially with McQueary who walked in on Sandusky raping a little boy and did nothing but establish eye contact. He's a big, strong guy and could've easily stopped the rape, but instead just left the room. McQueary's about a foot taller and 100 pounds heavier than me, but I guarantee you that I would've found a way to help that child. And I would reported it to the police, instead of just my boss.
Sorry, I should clarify: Even though Soon-Yi is now an adult and her relationship with Woody is now technically consensual, if he molested her as a child -- and I believe he did, considering he preyed on her younger sister Dylan -- then she is likely so psychologically damaged by that that she doesn't see him for the predator that he is.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that she and Woody adopted two girls -- despite the evidence that Woody molested Dylan (as well as her own firsthand experiences) -- clearly reflects the fact that Soon-Yi doesn't understand that he's a pedophile, no doubt because then she'd have to come to terms with being his victim.
It's an awful, awful situation. I honestly think that Woody robbed Soon-Yi of her childhood and has completely destroyed her life.
@Violet
ReplyDelete"Even though Soon-Yi is now an adult and her relationship with Woody is now technically consensual, if he molested her as a child -- and I believe he did, considering he preyed on her younger sister Dylan -- then she is likely so psychologically damaged by that that she doesn't see him for the predator that he is."
I agree with you. I honestly had no idea what had transpired with the other kids -- and I'd like to think that I've always kept up with gossip pretty well. Damn.
I also think it's sick how Hollywood (and the moviegoing public) has forgiven Woody for this. But hey, look at Polanski...
@Buckwald VonSnide
ReplyDelete"I also think it's sick how Hollywood (and the moviegoing public) has forgiven Woody for this. But hey, look at Polanski..."
Agreed. I personally no longer watch movies by either of them, because I don't want to support pedophiles in any way.
@timebob, Yea I don't get how the wife stood idly by. She had to know.
ReplyDeleteI wondered if his relatives would be the next topic....
Violet thank you for reminding the people taking up for Woody Allen about the Dylan situation.He is one of the biggest scumbags ever.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a Rosie O'Donnell fan but I will give her credit for being one of the very few who called out Woody Allen for what he did. Everyone else in Hollywood just kisses his ass and considers him a genius. As far as I'm concerned, he and Polanski should rot in a cell together.
ReplyDeleteohh my god i'm just sick to my freaking stomach with this guy.
ReplyDelete@B - Whenever someone defends Woody Allen, my first assumption is that they simply don't know the whole backstory. That said, I'm sure a lot of people in Hollywood know all the details and simply put it out of their minds. It's that Penn U mentality and it's got to stop.
ReplyDelete@Mango - Yeah, Rosie O'Donnell has been one of the few and I admire her for taking such a strong stand. That took a lot of guts, and I'm sure really raised awareness of the situation. Allen, Polanski and Sandusky should all rot in jail -- preferably in Poland, where they castrate pedophiles.