Lindsay Lohan 2005 - I Will Never Go Nude
Oh how times change. Back in 2005, Lindsay Lohan was a 19 year old who was barely doing drugs and booze, had never been arrested and had a promising career ahead of her. So, she probably thought she would never have to go nude to get what she wanted, an Oscar. Access Hollywood has probably been saving this thing until the time was just right and after the announcement that Lindsay is posing for Playboy they decided to bring it back out for the world to see.
Never say never, Lindsay, it always comes back to bite you in the ass.
ReplyDeleteI'll bet that at this same time she thought she would never be the sole support for her entire family.
ReplyDeleteShe also confirmed yesterday that her kid sister Ally was there for the Playboy shoot.
ReplyDeleteIt's too late for Lindsay, but how I would like to take Ally out of that environment and send her to a normal school away from her toxic family.
Can you imagine being related, AND spending time with Dina and Lindsay?
As much as Lindsay annoys me I have to cut her slack on this. 'm sure there we all had stuff we said we weren't going to do at 19 that we did when older. Things change people change.
ReplyDeleteI think it's ironic, yet also kind of sad.
ReplyDeleteThis picture versus the most recent ones show just how far she has fallen. It is just sad. Don't get me started on Dina and what she could do to Ali and the rest of her money makers, I mean children. **Growling**
ReplyDeleteI knew she would end up doing Playboy sooner or later. Short of working the pole (cause she's already out on the stroll) it's the last legitimate gig available to her.
ReplyDeletegod she looks so much better here. so sad meanwhile Amy Winehouse was clean cept the booze and shes dead.
ReplyDeleteit's sad because she was promised
ReplyDeletethis breaks my heart...she's in complete free-fall and her pos parents don't give a flying flip. i desperately don't want her to die, but i see this playboy spread as the beginning of even worse things to come...i'd give anything to see this girl be accountable, get honest help, and retake control of her career...there was genuine talent there, i know it's still somewhere in there.
ReplyDeleteLittle off topic, watched Tosh.0 - and it's her voice you hear at the begining (telling you not to do what you see on the show). Hard for me to believe she actually did legit work.
ReplyDeleteNext up: Dancing with the "Stars".
ReplyDeleteLindsay was actually already in the downward spiral when she was 19. When she was 19 and finally turned 20,that's when her mom forgot how old she was and was calling her a teenager of 19 and defending her drug use.
ReplyDeletePoor girl..Still thought she was gonna get an Oscar even back then. I mean she did say that right? They're doing road work outside my apt and this was hard to hear.
ReplyDeleteI can't believe I'm actually defending the coke-addled little ho-bag, but she said she'd "never do a nude scene." As in a movie. Didn't say she'd never pose nude.
ReplyDeleteThis whole story - her whole adult life actually - makes me sad.
ReplyDeleteShe was 19 here? That is some Benjamin Buttons shit cuz she looks old as hell already.
ReplyDeleteI think she doesn't look any different in that video than she does now. I don't even think that she looks as bad now as people claim all the time. She's not ugly by any means, she just looks very disheveled. And for a natural redhead with so many freckles it's normal to have wrinkles on her face at an early age when they use to live in an area where the sun is shining throughout the whole year, so this doesn't necessarily have anything to do with her drug abuse but more about her not wearing enough sun blocker.
ReplyDeleteThere are a lot of 20-something actors and actresses from L. A. who could easily pass for 30-something because of the wrinkles in their faces.
As to the Playboy shoot; didn't she already pose nude as a cheap Marilyn look-alike and I read somewhere that she won't even show much in that shoot, no crotch shots and not even totally topless. So what's the fuss?
As someone who has addiction in the family what's sad about this soundbite most of all is deep down she probably still feels that same sort of integrity about her work.
ReplyDeletePeople think addicts change once they are fully enthralled with their addiction. I disagree. I just think the real person is more hidden away as the dominant personality of the addiction takes over.
That's why I dont like when people say, at 25, that she is done for or a waste of space. She isnt. I dont think she is done with the booze or drugs yet, maybe by a long shot. But when/if that day ever comes, Im willing to give her a chance and see what sort of things she produces, cause this Lindsay, pre-addiction, was worth something. And deep down she still is.
Hasn't she always been the sole support of her family? Since her 1st movie anyway.
ReplyDelete@AngusParvo - have you seen Machete? I don't think she had clothes on once through the entire thing.
ReplyDelete@RocketQueen - I've seen Machete several times (not because of LiLo), and she really doesn't show much. Her hair is covering her boobs, and nothing below the waist is shown. She shows a lot of skin, but nothing more than what you'd see if she was wearing a bikini.
ReplyDeleteAccording to TMZ, Lilo delivers (as they put it) "the holy trifecta" in her photo shoot--the proverbial full Monty.
ReplyDeleteOT, but: check out Michael Lohan's judge in Florida, who basically read him the riot act and talked about adding a felony to his current charges. At least one Lohan is getting what they deserve.
iheartjacksparrow - I don't know how you watched that movie several times - I thought it was just awful and almost stopped it twice. While I agree they didn't show her full frontal, she was butt-ass naked in most of her scenes. Just saying.
ReplyDeleteNever Nude!
ReplyDeleteShe's probably having trouble picking up new tricks after her teeth pictures were released, so this is an opportunity for some free advertising for the merchandise.
Oh, and she had a body double for parts of Machete.
ReplyDeleteNothing wrong with posing in Playboy. Marilyn Monroe did. The thing is, Lindsay Lohan was on the A-List and going towards an Oscar. Most A-List, Oscar-winning actresses don't choose to pose for Playboy because they don't have to or it's just not their thing. I don't know what to think. I hope she's doing it because she wants to and not solely because of the money, because that would be sad. I suspect that is the reason, though. :(
ReplyDeleteI'd be lying if I didn't say she annoys me, but that's likely because she's in denial. Poor girl has two monkeys on her back - her addiction, and her freeloading family. I don't know how she's going to make it. The mother needs to get off her butt and get a job and stop pimping out her daughters. White Oprah has my utmost contempt.
that clip makes me feel sad too. drugs and booze are a tough way to go. she was so bright and shinny.
ReplyDeleteYou know how 19 year old never change their minds!
ReplyDelete