This weekend is the airing of Kim Kardashian's wedding brought you by E!, McDonald's, QuickTrim and whatever corporate sponsors she could cajole into giving her a few bucks. In what could be her most disingenuous interview ever, Kim told Australia InStyle that the reason she filmed her wedding was for her fans. Umm. The only reason she filmed her wedding was because of the money that was paid to her and the reason she sold the pictures of her wedding. It has nothing to do with fans. It has everything to do with making money. Let me be clear that if someone offered me the kind of money they offered her, I would film any of my weddings. I would go back in time and recreate every last one of them for that kind of money. I don't begrudge her the money at all. If someone throws it at you, then by all means take it, just don't come off as saying you only did it for your fans.
"That was a really big discussion, we took weeks to decide if we were going to film it or not, but I felt like my fans - everyone that has gone on this journey with me, seeing different relationships that I've been in - would feel cheated if I didn't film it. It was something that Kris and I were okay with, and the beauty of it is we get to edit it. It [will be] great to look back at that and see this time in our lives."
We would feel cheated? Yeah, well when she gets married the next time and no one is offering her any money for it, lets see if she films it for her fans.
Such Krap.
ReplyDeleteRemember way back when we bitched about all the press Paris Hilton got? Now she seems pretty much in the background. I am hoping that the whole kard klan will go that way soon! But they are genius at marketing themselves, I'll give them that. We all just seem to hate them for being themselves. And they laugh all the way to the bank...
ReplyDeleteLike she really thought about not filming her wedding. Yeah, right. And her boobs are real, she didn't get peed on in her sex tape, Kris Humphries is the love of her life.
ReplyDeleteOne of the Kardashians must be blowing somebody at InStyle. I've been a subscriber for years and I've noticed over the last six months or so that at least one of them is in every issue. I love reading my InStyle every month, but I will not be keeping my subscription if they don't quit promoting those trampy idiots.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the weekend bites.
ReplyDeleteWhy does she have fans? That is the only question. I've given up on E network, all they show is something about the Kardsahians. It's ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteThey took "weeks" to decide? I'm sure someone more industrious than I am can look up when they got engaged and when they announced they were going to air in on TV. I highly doubt that was weeks.
ReplyDeleteRJ, exactly!
ReplyDeletelove that dress she's wearing.
sick of all of them. i comfort myself with the knowledge that i once thought i would be seeing the mug of paris hilton every day, and now she's never around. just the promos of the kardashian show are so embarassing! one talked about the mother peeing her pants all the time. (shhhhh!)
i notice that each media whore is worse than the one before. like they learn from each other.
She began her "career" by being filmed, so it seems like it's a natural progression for her. Wonder what it was like in the beginning when they pitched the reality show idea to E!. I'm sure the producers were like "well what do the rest of you do?" "Well...nothing, but our sister is a whore."
ReplyDeleteShe has fans?
ReplyDeleteShe only KNEW her "husband" for a few weeks before they got "engaged", so wtf is she talking about? She is such a LIAR. I can't stand her. She is truly vomit inducing.
ReplyDeleteWhat new body? Are they talking about the one they have photoshopped to death? Cause there is enough evidence to support the fact that her ass is just as big now as it was a month or two or six ago.
ReplyDeleteI read somewhere Nike had to refund millions of dollars because their lame shape up shoes didn't really do that. Was Nike the company she worked for? Cause you know I take great joy is products losing money because of their lousey marketing strategies and poorly chosen spokespersons.
^it was reebok who has to pay $24 MILLION. She advertised for Sketchers, who had a similar product and I'm expecting a similar fine for them as well.
ReplyDeleteshe is a liar, but that can't be surprising.
ReplyDeleteshe would be fugly w/o her nose jobs and botox and whatever else she had done on her face. and w/o the electrolysis she would have hair covering everywhere.
it would be hard to imagine a more narcissistic person (ok, JLo, but at least she tries to sing/act/dance even though she's bad at all three), or a more narcissistic family than hers.
the fact that anyone even watches that awful show is a testament to the decline of western civilization.
Annabelle- I totally agree with that last statement. I've already deleted one facebook friend who said they were watching the wedding on tv.
ReplyDeleteIt's a fairy tale.....pure bull.
ReplyDeleteHow much was she paid for the filming of the wedding? More or less than her earnings from the sex tape?
ReplyDelete