Please look at the new cover of In Touch. They promise exclusive photos of Jennifer Aniston's beach wedding. You know, at some point someone needs to stop the tabloids. Not only do they look ridiculous, but unless you have a lot of time while you are the checkout stand you don't have time to see they are lying to you until after you buy it. Yes, you and I know she is not really married, but I guarantee you that you know at least one or two people who get their gossip from the tabloids and might have missed Jennifer getting married, but now they will get exclusive photos of it and they just have to spend $2.99. They do it because no one ever calls them on it. No celebrity is going to bother to sue about saying they are married when they are not, and no consumer is going to sue because it is not worth the effort, so the tabloids keep doing it, and each week they go a little further and use a little stronger language until you get a cover which offers them no out for their lying. Oh, and I love how they assume that just because Jen is married that she will be having babies. One more thing. If In Touch really had exclusive photos of the wedding, they would have put one on the cover. They did not because they want you to buy the issue before you figure out their scam.
ridiculous!
ReplyDeleteBut they did put on a shot of JA in a white dress, which is also confusing.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if a class action suit for lying to consumers would have any merit and legs to stand on...
ReplyDeleteI paged through this in the checkout line and was surprised by how greasy and Dracula-like her gent was.
ReplyDeleteI thought this pic was Kirstie Alley at first...yikes!
ReplyDeleteThe Tabs are scum. No surprises here.
ReplyDeleteI really am kind of shocked that tabloids aren't sued more than they are.
ReplyDeleteIf I were someone with Anniston money (or heck, Jolie-Pitt cash) I would have an attorney on a full time retainer to simply sue sue SUE.
I think it's pretty obvious these people 'don't bother' because they are eating up the attention and publicity.
If JA had to rely on her acting skills and the quality of her movies (with the exception of Marley and Me & Office Space) she would have faded from the public mind quickly. Same with Jolie. I mean c'mon..Salt? Please. I can't even remember the name of the movie where her son was kidnapped but I still hold a grudge against her for managing to make Johnny Depp look bad in the Tourist.
Depp, now THERE is a man who likes his privacy and doesn't have paps on speed dial.
nice dress........that is all i have to say
ReplyDeleteMegley: I remember the dress from a past photo shoot for Vogue or her water brand... or something like that. It's at least 6 months old.
ReplyDeleteMy husband innocently proclaimed to me that he heard Jennifer Aniston is getting married and how happy for her he is! He has absolutely no clue.
ReplyDeleteSo who is Maci, the one who has baby no #2 on the way?
ReplyDelete@Goodgrief - Probably one of the Teen Moms.
ReplyDeleteYou always know it's bullshit by the quotes. I don't think Jen would characterize her 2nd marriage (if it ever happens) as "so much sweeter."
She must be filming a movie with a beach wedding in the script.
ReplyDeleteI wish they'd do a cover like:
ReplyDelete"Look at Jen's new fillers. Isn't she beautiful with her cheeks all puffy!
See inside how you can get the same look."
Someone would get sued then. She just looks older since she started using fillers.
I agree Jeri. She looks terrible.
ReplyDeleteMaci is one of the teen moms. Poor thing.
ReplyDeleteShe looks just like Barbra Streisand.
ReplyDelete