This famous family is pretending solidarity in the spotlight, but for the last year and half the biggest celebrity in the family not only refuses to speak to everyone else behind the scenes, they also are taking legal action against the parents.
Kim K has often seemed to be over the rest of her family. Her mom is/was her manager, right? So that could be reason for a lawsuit.
I can't see it being Janet, because what could possibly be her reason for suing both of her parents? It wouldn't be about money, and if it were about Michael's kids, she'd just be suing Katherine, right?
It has been a year and a half since Michael died. So, Janet Jackson and the Jackson's for the win! Here is hoping the world is rid of that abusive scumbag Joe really, really soon. Hell is awaiting him with open arms.
@G- Kardashian mom is here, but Robert Kardashian (one of OJ's famed legal team) died many years ago.
Mama K then married Bruce Jenner, and I believe they have two daughters together, but they are being packaged as Kardashians (rather than Jenners) for career purposes.
But what public solidarity have the Jacksons had, for years?
It is probably some less obvious family...so just for fun because I like them and have long suspected something is up - my nonconformist left field guess is the Jonas family. Those boys weirdly ceased producing music, spending time together or being coherently managed as a group (dad is the manager) at a really inopportune time in their career - just about 18 months ago in fact...Joe is the arguably more famous one and has a solo album about to come out.
How do you keep legal proceedings secret these days, though?
Why would the Kardashians have to *fake* solidarity, though? They're making shittons of money, they at least appear to like each other quite a bit, and they haven't undergone a hardship since their dad died -- whereas the Jackson family is obviously pretty whacked-out and troubled.
You NEVER see Janet with Germaine or LaToya or Germajesty et al. She honestly doesn't strike me as a dumb woman, and I'll bet she was the closest to Michael. I say this is her -- she's being a protective auntie, and I hope she gets custody of those poor kids.
Selock- the Jackson brothers had that horrible, horrible reality show on A&E about themselves. Of course, they rushed to get on tv not long after Michael died, despite the family not having been close in recent years up to his death. The whole thing was too tacky for words.
Not to be sour or anything but if they're taking legal action, which is a public process, there is no reason in the world for this to be a blind. Unless it's a farce of a blind, which I often think of BuzzFoto.
Janet Jackson?
ReplyDeletePlease let this be the Kardashians!
ReplyDeleteJanet - Ms. Jackson if your nasty (sorry, couldn't resist)
ReplyDeleteHas to be the Jacksons. Not that I ever believed in their solidarity.
ReplyDeleteAre the Kardashian parents alive?
Yeah, I agree with Stacy. The Jacksons.
ReplyDeleteNo way is it The Kardashians, they're all up each others asses. They tight.
Jackson's.
ReplyDeleteThe "year and a half" gives it away.
That's when Michael died.
Kim K has often seemed to be over the rest of her family. Her mom is/was her manager, right? So that could be reason for a lawsuit.
ReplyDeleteI can't see it being Janet, because what could possibly be her reason for suing both of her parents? It wouldn't be about money, and if it were about Michael's kids, she'd just be suing Katherine, right?
I thought Janet Jackson right away but I don't know what she could be suing about.
ReplyDeleteIt has been a year and a half since Michael died. So, Janet Jackson and the Jackson's for the win! Here is hoping the world is rid of that abusive scumbag Joe really, really soon. Hell is awaiting him with open arms.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Janet wants to protect Michaels assets for his children and is suing them to have the money protected from Joe.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteoh, and for the blind?
ReplyDeletedef Jacksons. I'm so done with them, I just want the tabs to go back to Britney where they belong!
Exactly what Big Mama said.
ReplyDeletethe billy rae cyruses?
ReplyDeleteDefinitely Janet Jackson. The timeline fits with Michael's passing, and the rest of the family only care about money and famewhoring.
ReplyDelete@G-
ReplyDeleteKardashian mom is here, but Robert Kardashian (one of OJ's famed legal team) died many years ago.
Mama K then married Bruce Jenner, and I believe they have two daughters together, but they are being packaged as Kardashians (rather than Jenners) for career purposes.
By career I mean.... well, you know.
But what public solidarity have the Jacksons had, for years?
ReplyDeleteIt is probably some less obvious family...so just for fun because I like them and have long suspected something is up - my nonconformist left field guess is the Jonas family. Those boys weirdly ceased producing music, spending time together or being coherently managed as a group (dad is the manager) at a really inopportune time in their career - just about 18 months ago in fact...Joe is the arguably more famous one and has a solo album about to come out.
How do you keep legal proceedings secret these days, though?
Why would the Kardashians have to *fake* solidarity, though? They're making shittons of money, they at least appear to like each other quite a bit, and they haven't undergone a hardship since their dad died -- whereas the Jackson family is obviously pretty whacked-out and troubled.
ReplyDeleteYou NEVER see Janet with Germaine or LaToya or Germajesty et al. She honestly doesn't strike me as a dumb woman, and I'll bet she was the closest to Michael. I say this is her -- she's being a protective auntie, and I hope she gets custody of those poor kids.
Selock- the Jackson brothers had that horrible, horrible reality show on A&E about themselves. Of course, they rushed to get on tv not long after Michael died, despite the family not having been close in recent years up to his death. The whole thing was too tacky for words.
ReplyDeleteAnd we don't even need to go there with LaToya.
Its Janet, she hates how the kids are being exposed and knows Michael would not want this...he protected them from the public and the media.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everyone about the Jacksons and I hope she is suing to get custody of those kids. They would be better off with her...
ReplyDeletePay attention Lindsay!
ReplyDeleteAll the Jacksons are money bloodsuckers except for Janet. She earned her own fortune in music and acting.
ReplyDeleteShe keeps clear so they don't try to get on her money teet.
Hadn't Katharine kicked Joe out and got some type of restraining order against him to keep the kids safe? I don't know if I am remembering correctly.
ReplyDeleteNot to be sour or anything but if they're taking legal action, which is a public process, there is no reason in the world for this to be a blind. Unless it's a farce of a blind, which I often think of BuzzFoto.
ReplyDeleteJanet does not have to do anything to protect Michael's assets from Joe, Michael's will is more than enough.
ReplyDeleteGeez, my first thought was the Sheens. It's probably the Jackson family, but I do like that Jonas guess, Selock.
ReplyDelete