Tuesday, February 22, 2011

BuzzFoto Blind Item

This famous family is pretending solidarity in the spotlight, but for the last year and half the biggest celebrity in the family not only refuses to speak to everyone else behind the scenes, they also are taking legal action against the parents.

27 comments:

  1. Please let this be the Kardashians!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Janet - Ms. Jackson if your nasty (sorry, couldn't resist)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Has to be the Jacksons. Not that I ever believed in their solidarity.

    Are the Kardashian parents alive?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, I agree with Stacy. The Jacksons.
    No way is it The Kardashians, they're all up each others asses. They tight.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jackson's.

    The "year and a half" gives it away.
    That's when Michael died.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kim K has often seemed to be over the rest of her family. Her mom is/was her manager, right? So that could be reason for a lawsuit.

    I can't see it being Janet, because what could possibly be her reason for suing both of her parents? It wouldn't be about money, and if it were about Michael's kids, she'd just be suing Katherine, right?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought Janet Jackson right away but I don't know what she could be suing about.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:07 AM

    It has been a year and a half since Michael died. So, Janet Jackson and the Jackson's for the win! Here is hoping the world is rid of that abusive scumbag Joe really, really soon. Hell is awaiting him with open arms.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Maybe Janet wants to protect Michaels assets for his children and is suing them to have the money protected from Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. oh, and for the blind?

    def Jacksons. I'm so done with them, I just want the tabs to go back to Britney where they belong!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Exactly what Big Mama said.

    ReplyDelete
  13. the billy rae cyruses?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Definitely Janet Jackson. The timeline fits with Michael's passing, and the rest of the family only care about money and famewhoring.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @G-
    Kardashian mom is here, but Robert Kardashian (one of OJ's famed legal team) died many years ago.

    Mama K then married Bruce Jenner, and I believe they have two daughters together, but they are being packaged as Kardashians (rather than Jenners) for career purposes.

    By career I mean.... well, you know.

    ReplyDelete
  16. But what public solidarity have the Jacksons had, for years?

    It is probably some less obvious family...so just for fun because I like them and have long suspected something is up - my nonconformist left field guess is the Jonas family. Those boys weirdly ceased producing music, spending time together or being coherently managed as a group (dad is the manager) at a really inopportune time in their career - just about 18 months ago in fact...Joe is the arguably more famous one and has a solo album about to come out.

    How do you keep legal proceedings secret these days, though?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Why would the Kardashians have to *fake* solidarity, though? They're making shittons of money, they at least appear to like each other quite a bit, and they haven't undergone a hardship since their dad died -- whereas the Jackson family is obviously pretty whacked-out and troubled.

    You NEVER see Janet with Germaine or LaToya or Germajesty et al. She honestly doesn't strike me as a dumb woman, and I'll bet she was the closest to Michael. I say this is her -- she's being a protective auntie, and I hope she gets custody of those poor kids.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Selock- the Jackson brothers had that horrible, horrible reality show on A&E about themselves. Of course, they rushed to get on tv not long after Michael died, despite the family not having been close in recent years up to his death. The whole thing was too tacky for words.

    And we don't even need to go there with LaToya.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Its Janet, she hates how the kids are being exposed and knows Michael would not want this...he protected them from the public and the media.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree with everyone about the Jacksons and I hope she is suing to get custody of those kids. They would be better off with her...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Pay attention Lindsay!

    ReplyDelete
  22. All the Jacksons are money bloodsuckers except for Janet. She earned her own fortune in music and acting.

    She keeps clear so they don't try to get on her money teet.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hadn't Katharine kicked Joe out and got some type of restraining order against him to keep the kids safe? I don't know if I am remembering correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Not to be sour or anything but if they're taking legal action, which is a public process, there is no reason in the world for this to be a blind. Unless it's a farce of a blind, which I often think of BuzzFoto.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Janet does not have to do anything to protect Michael's assets from Joe, Michael's will is more than enough.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Geez, my first thought was the Sheens. It's probably the Jackson family, but I do like that Jonas guess, Selock.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days