Life & Style must be trying to win points with Sandra Bullock's publicity people, because they kind of pulled a Kneepads in their latest cover. They say with all seriousness that Sandra decided to break things off with Ryan Reynolds so she could focus on her son Louis. She is sacrificing her own happiness for that of her son. Umm, so her son gave an opinion on whether she would be happy with Ryan? I don't understand. If she is not with Ryan she is not happy? Not that they were ever together in the first place, but that seems kind of rude of the tabloid to assume the only way Sandra could ever be happy is with Ryan or some other guy. I think they were just trying to make her appear as selfless as possible and portray her as a martyr just in case she ever decides to adopt another child so the tabloid can have first dibs on the announcement or a picture.
Is she going to become the new Jennifer Aniston now? Poor Sandra, who can never find the right man...
ReplyDeleteSpin, no one takes these rags seriously .
ReplyDeleteI think if Sandy gets in a romance again it will not be with an actor or someone high profile.
ReplyDeleteI can see her going the Reese route and dating an agent or lawyer safe and non-celeb.
I agree about the relationship, timebob, but that doesn't mean she's not having fun. JMO, but Sandy strikes me as recreational and naughty.
ReplyDeleteYeah she and Ryan aren't 'dating'. I didn't 'date' half the guys I've slept with either.
I think Ryan should be the one insulted by this cover. He's portrayed as another dude who won't date a woman with kids? Not a compliment.
I want to know what she and ScarJo dished about at the GG.
ReplyDeletesandra bullock was just fine without a man for years. she really doesn't fit the needy female part at all. i think she's just fine.
ReplyDeleteAll these tabs are based on the premise that women are nothing without an all-powerful man. We will go to any lengths to "catch" one of these magnificent possessors of the penis, even if we have to "steal" a man from women who aren't good enough to hold on to their man. Any woman who is without one of these god-like creatures is sad and lonely, and must be contemplating adopting a baby, because our lady parts hurt if we have to spend even an hour alone with only the thoughts in our empty little heads to occupy our time.
ReplyDeleteSorry, I've got the winter blues. Y'all just ignore me til Spring.
She should get back together with Ryan Gosling for a little while just for some nookie!
ReplyDeletelol @RJ
ReplyDeleteI love it!
I'm starting to wonder the same w/ the comparisons of Sandra to Jen A's covers....LE SIGH.
ReplyDeleteThe only difference is Jesse James is NO Brad Pitt.
I hope she stays single awhile....