Sandra Bullock Is Your New Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Aniston is probably smoking a cigarette pouting right now because Sandra Bullock at least for this week is the searching for a boyfriend wanting a baby tabloid story. The Enquirer has a piece in their issue this week which can easily be modified to fit any single female in Hollywood. The gist of the story is that Sandra is on "the hunt" for a new man. She wants someone domesticated. Their word, not mine. Does he have to be potty trained too? Sandra also has supposedly been talking to the adoption agency where she got Louis because Sandra wants another baby. If she does ever adopt another baby then she will probably get 10 covers a year where tabloids speculate that she is about to adopt another baby. Apparently in Hollywood, adopting babies is a lot like a tattoo. Having one is one thing, but if you go for a second tattoo then you are totally game for three or four or five.
Rolls eyes.
ReplyDeleteSandra doesn't have the fame whore thing that Aniston does.
ReplyDeleteOh please, Sandy is a down to earth smart gal....this is bull
ReplyDeleteI might be the only one left, but I don't blame Jen Aniston for all those stories. The tabloids love to write that crap because it gets sold. And it's actually hurt her career, not helped.
ReplyDeleteBut overall I am sick and tired of the "need a man" bullshit! What's wrong with a strong (single) woman, raising a family and being successful? I am 27 and live in a small midwestern town, and society has deemed me a spinster because I am unmarried. And it's all because of crap like this from tabloids and celebrities. I think Sandra would be successful with or without a man in her life.
I think it's helped Jen's career. Another romantic comedy anyone?? "Oh why can't Jen just find love?!"
ReplyDeleteBut Jen's movies never do any good. She might get paid for them, but she can't get much cred or good reputation for 'em. Plus, there's no way she'll ever get the "serious" roles like Sandra can get....then again, that has more to do with talent! :-)
ReplyDeleteI'm offended that there is even a comparison between these two. Aniston has the poor single me market cornered, not Sandy. This smells fishy.
ReplyDeletei'm so hungry i saw poutine ,not pouting.
ReplyDeletethat is all.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSandy is way to classy for this bs.
ReplyDeleteI think both ladies are just fine on their own. I highly doubt Sandra has much time for man hunting with an infant in tow.
ReplyDeletemch ftw.
ReplyDeleteDon't believe Sandra Bullock would stoop to this level. Let her be!
ReplyDeleteAlso, Jackie - wait until you're 43, never been married, no children. Talk about spinster treatment!