Apparently the news that Beyonce is pregnant is only worth a side cover photo when speculating that Reese Witherspoon is about to be engaged, which leads me to believe that US Weekly is not 100% sure that Beyonce is actually pregnant. In the article, a source says that Beyonce wanted to finish an album and go on a world tour but can't now that she is pregnant. I don't see why she could not do those things if she wants to. Sure, she might not be able to dance as much as she normally would, but I know a lot of women who work all the way until the day they give birth.
Also, Beyonce is supposedly still in her first trimester so I doubt she is sharing the news to very many people and I doubt that any of those would probably go running to US as soon as they heard the news. Beyonce may very well be pregnant, but I still think the story is wrong. They used a really old quote from Solange about how Beyonce would be a great mom, but they make it seem like Solange is confirming the pregnancy which she did not.
Honey, if I even thought I might be pregnant I would be sitting at home on the couch eating bacon all day long!
ReplyDeleteJust read elsewhere that Beyonce's sister Solange has confirmed it. I guess she'll have to take a break from performing for dictators for a while.
ReplyDeleteSeriously that is the worst WHO CARES about anyone of those people cover i've ever seen.....boring
ReplyDeleteEvery headline on the cover looks like a snoozefest to me.
ReplyDeleteIs this Kendra stuff really happening? Does anyone have a good link to the story?
ReplyDeletebloodonthescreen, as far as I can figure out, it's a contract issue with the show - they have permissions to shoot in Philly, but not in the Twin Cities, so Kendra has to stay there (or LA) while Hanks in MN for the show. But I haven't seen/read the articles.
ReplyDeletethey released a statement that she is NOT pregnant. Beyonce is too career minded right now for children. I think she will have them in a couple of years. She has even said that after watching her sister give birth that she is not in any hurry to do it herself because it scared her.
ReplyDeleteJust want to know if Angie is pregnant again.
ReplyDeleteI was nauseous as hell during my first trimester. The chances of you finding me shaking my bootie to Crazy in Love or Put a Ring on It were slim to none, so I can't fault a girl for wanting to delay her concert.
ReplyDeleteThat said, didn't Gwen Stefani tour while preggars with No Doubt?
And I always loved MIA's performance at the Grammy's while ready to give birth at any sec.
My due date is officially three weeks away. I'm kind of wigging, and the insomnia, whalelike feeling and need to pee every five seconds is getting old. Really fast. Hee. At least I work from home like a spoiled brat. Next week's my last week. Woo hoo!
I heard from a close source that she has been pregnant for a while and has gone underground. I couldn't figure out how stars do this, unless they don't make public appearances? Anyway, what they basically said is that she will have had the baby while everyone think she is still pregnant so they can avoid the media glare.
ReplyDeleteIf I were a rich, famous celeb, I certainly wouldn't tour the world and perform while pregnant. I would stay home, take care of my body, exercise, eat well, etc. I did work, because I had to, and it was fine, but I was sitting at a desk, not shaking my thang.
ReplyDeleteHow can a pregnancy be a surprise if you are a married woman? If you don't want kids there are all kinds of birth control methods out there that are very effective against surprises. If you aren't on birth control and are having sex with your husband--you would have to be pretty freaking stupid not to clue in that a baby may be the result.
ReplyDeleteI suppose that level of motivation isn't what gets you to their level of stardom though.
ReplyDeleteso they're outing her and not mariah?
ReplyDeletei want mariah deets!
Thx Lian & Congrats Susan. :)
ReplyDeleteWhat @lanasyogamama said....
ReplyDelete+
I don't think she is pregnant.