Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Do You Remember When Kim Kardashian Said She Regretted Posing Nude?


I think it was about a month or maybe six weeks ago when Playboy released more nude photos of Kim Kardashian that she said she did not realize there were more naked photos of her and she regretted ever posing nude in the first place. Uh huh. What makes her words even more hollow sounding is that she probably had already posed nude for this month's issue of W Magazine. Not nude as in hiding essential body parts, but nude, as in hey look at every inch of my body please. The picture above only hints at what is inside. Basically, Kim is painted to look like the Silver Surfer but is wearing no clothes. I guess she just wants to remind the world how she got started in show business. I also can't believe W put her on the cover.

26 comments:

  1. I love the full nude pic. You can see the breast implant that she swears she doesn't have.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Butt and class at an inverse ratio.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ewww, she looks so plastic-y.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Glad Kim's staying classy. At the same time though, what else can she really do that would make her interesting?

    ReplyDelete
  5. it's official:
    W jumped the shark

    ReplyDelete
  6. Her deceased father would have been so proud to see his baby turn into a soft porn star.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When will this Ho go away...gee enough already. Shame on you W.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What breaks my heart is that average teens like my own want to grow up and be like her - as in, rich, with unlimited fame and attention. To them, it looks like she has the best life ever.

    Media, stop glorifying these leeches. They do nothing to add to society; they are the lowest common denominator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "The ART Issue, Starring Kim Kardashian"

    Van Gogh, Monet, da Vinci, Munch, Botticelli, Michaelangelo, Warhol and many others are somewhere laughing their asses off today.

    ReplyDelete
  10. IMHO her father is rolling over in his grave so often, he's dizzy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have no idea how modeling works, but did Playboy pay her a one time thing but had rights to publish her photos later as they wanted? If that's the case, I think she needs to tweek her statement to be that she will pose nude for a direct share in the $$$. Why won't this family go away?

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is just the weirdest thing ever. I repeat what O said- the ART issue? Are you kidding me??

    Also, did u see the pics inside? They are even worse.

    ReplyDelete
  13. they use the word "art" to try and fool us into thinking the magazine is not full of pictures of a slut

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous12:12 PM

    Her body looks weird.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I always admired W for really being about fashion, but they have now sunk way lower than Vogue.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Enough with this family. They're not worthy. Who the hell is shocked about her hypocrisy? No one.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I seriously did not think it was possible for me to detest someone more than Paris.

    Kim wins.

    ReplyDelete
  18. W magazine:Art :: ABC's dancing show:Stars

    ReplyDelete
  19. Honestly, though, what makes her so slutty? Is she known for banging lots of dudes? And if that's the case, can we start referring to people like Clooney as whores, because he seems to enjoy women who aren't half as classy as Kim.

    My point: I know she's a total idiot, but I think that she's be called a whore less often if she were skinnier and had a less overtly-sexy figure. I'm honestly GLAD that someone with a gigantic ass is a sex symbol!

    Whatever. Nudity pops up everywhere nowadays. Americans need to honestly just get over it.

    And I think she's gorgeous. I hate to think it, but I do.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Also, COME ON!! She CANNOT be more detestable than fucking PARIS!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. She posed as the Silver Surfer? Forget her daddy rolling over in his grave. How dare she make Jack Kirby roll over in his grave.

    (He did not create Norrin Radd so some tartlet could "class up" her porn and pose as the Silver Surfer)

    Yeah, I'm a geek like that. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  22. I have to agree with amoteafloat. I've read a couple of books about the slut label and one of the theories is that kids tag girls that are more "developed" as being a slut regardless of actual sexual behavior. I know it happened to me in both middle school and high school when I was still a virgin.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Posing nude (or painted over) doesn't make one a whore. Texting in a movie theater and only stopping after being pelted with M&Ms is pure assholeness.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I don't think that women call women like Kim Kardashian a whore or a slut (or even worse; a cunt) because she's so curvy. I think women use to call other women sluts and whores etc. to distance themselves from those kinds of women and the poor light they seem to cast on women in general. If a man does something stupid, despicable or embarrassing he's mostly judged by his actions alone and it doesn't affect men in general. If a woman does something like that it often reflects badly on other women too. That's why women tend to be so harsh to each other and that's why there's no solidarity among women which, for me, is the main reason why we still don't have equal rights.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days