Wednesday, June 23, 2010

OK! Magazine Plays The Jennifer Aniston Is Having A Baby Card


I realize there are many people in the world who still don't look at gossip online and get all their gossip from either the tabloids or the tabloid covers. Even with that in mind you would think at some point they would be able to figure out that if Jennifer Aniston had a baby everytime the tabloids reported it that she would be giving the Duggar family a run for their money.

Once again, OK! has decided to go ahead and try and sell some copies by claiming that Jennifer is having a baby. I love how they say there is an interview, like Jennifer actually sat down for one with the magazine and told them she is having a baby. No idea of course who the dad is. Apparently Jennifer is ready now and all the other times the magazine said she was ready were wrong.

The sad thing is the magazine will probably sell a lot of copies and people will walk around for a week saying that Jennifer is going to have a baby. Oh, and that Kristen and Rob are getting married. See, that is the cover they should have blown up. I think they would have sold way more issues with that crap then the Jennifer Aniston crap.


17 comments:

  1. i think the most fresh thing in that cover is jens face. Holy crap, her face looks like it has been painted on using crayons. Nice retouchers, OK!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Probably it's because according to Star, Angelina is adopting #7.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They rotate this headline with Brad Walks out on Angie, and Angelina to Adopt Again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @linnea - took the words out of my mouth. That is some serious Photoshop overload.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:08 PM

    They must have cut 10 years there lol. I still dont' like her LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jen must have paid them more money to keep her relevant since her last FLOP of a movie. LOL.

    In all honesty if she wanted to have a baby she would have done it by now. I don't understand the need for them to print this about her every other week, LET IT GO.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This must be her 2 millionth pregnancy according to the tabloids. Sad thing is if she ever does get pregnant, no one will believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigght.




    suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hasn't everyone else her age that wanted a baby bought one by now?!?!?! She doesn't want one! Lots of people just don't want one. There isn't anything wrong with that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. When not seriously photo-shopped, she is starting to look ridden hard and put away wet.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous12:32 PM

    Why do they photoshop like that? Why try to make someone in her early 40s look 16? There's no sin in being in your 40s.

    I agree, if she'd wanted kids, she'd have had them or adopted by now. No shame in not wanting kids, but it's sort of tiring to see the insistence in the media that she does.

    ReplyDelete
  12. She will be 75 and using a walker and the tabloids will still be printing Jen wants a baby stories.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jennifer Aniston's having a baby? Now THAT'S a scoop.

    ReplyDelete
  14. this is the only thing they can think of to say about her. what else do they have? boyfriend news? nope. good movie parts? of course not.
    so they recycle this bullshit over and over again.

    she's probably glad for the publicity but man, i'd be sick of this shit if i were her.

    if she wanted a baby so much, she'd have gone to the baby store and bought one, like everybody else out there.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If I were her I don't know if I'd just laugh or be completely irritated. I feel like the people that read those mags are bigger morons than the people that write for them.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Just one thing: I love all you comentors here and have for years.
    With this post...I laughed til I cried.
    You all rock. :)
    Thanks for making my day!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Syko -

    You're right - there's nothing wrong with not wanting children. And Jennifer Fraudiston DOES NOT want children. The problem is that she's spent the last 15 years telling middle America, "I did, I do and I will" when her break-up with Pitt was being blamed on her unwillingness to spit out his babies. In fact, Aniston began talking publicly about her supposed desire to spawn while she was still dating Tate Donovan. That was in 1995. You seen her produce any long-chinned, big nosed prodigy yet? Aniston's lied about wanting kids so much and for so long that the only people who believe her anymore are her hardcore fans and possibly some of her sycophants she calls her "Goddess Circle". Even the tabloid hacks don't believe she'll ever have a baby or adopt a baby. They just keep putting on the cover because the MVM want "Rachel" to be happy and to a lot of these women a woman can't be happy without children, a husband and a white picket fence. That's almost as pathetic as Aniston herself.

    ReplyDelete