Thursday, January 14, 2010

Want To See Jesse McCartney Naked?


I have no desire to see Jesse McCartney naked, but I'm guessing he must be embarrassed about what he has to offer or what it shows because his lawyer is sending out cease and desist letters to every site that posts the photo. It was apparently taken by an ex of Jesse and shows him in a g-string but also fully exposed. His lawyer really needs to work on the wording of her letters because she wants to make it sound like it isn't Jesse in the photo, but then screws up later.

"A person is attempting to circulate a nude photo which purports to be Mr. McCartney. McCartney was unaware of the taking of this alleged photo, did not knowingly participate in the taking of this photo, and certainly did not consent to the taking of such photo."

The first part says it might not be his, but in the second part of the statement it is pretty obvious that it is. Oh, and get this sentence, it is my favorite. "It appears that this photo has been manipulated and doctored by computer software."

How so? Is it smaller than real life? Did you ask him to drop trou so you could take a look? How does one verify that a picture of peen has in fact been digitally altered from the real without seeing the real?


21 comments:

  1. No interest whatsoever.

    In other news, Lainey is reporting that a Lilo sex tape is circulating. It was only a matter of time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How can Jesse stop a photo that he allowed to be taken and is owned by someone else? Right there doesn't that imply consent at the time of the photo, being in a G-string and then nude? I'm no lawyer but if I was on a jury he'd lose right there. This doesn't sound like the case of that poor sportscaster who was stalked and photographed without her knowledge surreptitiously. He consented to it for the girl he was dating, it is her photo to do with as she wishes. Jesse is a dumbass an needs a new attorney, stat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. eeep. he looks 13...soooooo not interested in what he may or may not be packing...as for the lawyer, yeah, good luck w/ that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, no, no....that is one guy I do not wish to see naked in any form.

    ReplyDelete
  5. While grocery shopping and passing magazine racks, I've seen his spotty face on teen magazines. Eww, not interested thanks.

    I'm straight, but not generally interested in seeing anyone's peen either. Usually.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous11:35 AM

    I'll pass on that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. not naked, not live,not singing,not making me dinner. just,no.

    ReplyDelete
  8. you mean Lainey got the same email every blogger got this morning? lol.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm not a blogger, so couldn't tell you! But it's the only place *I've* seen it. It's cute how much you hate Lainey, Jax :P

    ReplyDelete
  11. Another dope that I don't know. So I guess I'm not interested in his little package either.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Michael K. mentioned the sex tape too.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No thank you. I will pass.

    That letter is hilarious...

    When will people learn not to take nudey photos if they don't want them to one day leak!?

    ReplyDelete
  14. So he's packing small then.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't want to see it. I do want someone else to see it and report on what the big (or not big) deal is. He's naked. So what?

    ReplyDelete
  16. A person is attempting...taken by an ex...could refer to another male, thereby rearranging quite a few g-strings in Jesse's closet.

    ReplyDelete
  17. For goodness sake, someone find that picture. I haven't had a good laugh in a while.

    ReplyDelete
  18. He's just not sexy enough to be added to this Blog:
    http://sexiestmen100.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  19. I wonder if it hangs severely to the same side of the mouth that he talks out of?

    ReplyDelete