Friday, January 01, 2010

Blind Items Revealed

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

This engagement is fairly new, but I definitely smell trouble. This Golden Globe nominated/winner B list movie actress has been entertaining a fairly steady stream of men at her fiance's home. Her fiance is a B list television actor on a very hit show. He must know this is going on as our actress doesn't hide what she has been doing and with whom but our actor doesn't seem to care.

Emily Blunt & John Krasinski

506 comments:

  1. Hmmm, so is she a beard? Enty, thanks for all the reveals! And Happy New Year!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well that's juicy, LOL

    ReplyDelete
  3. :( i really liked emily blunt and really didn't think this was her - wasn't she with that buble guy who cheated on her a LOT?

    ReplyDelete
  4. That is odd behavior..

    ReplyDelete
  5. he's either gay or they are into freaky stuff. i read somewhere that john likes to go antiquing. idk, maybe there are straight men into that.

    a small percentage of men would like to see their significant others being taken by another man.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This was also a popular guess on another site, I believe. She could be a beard. How could he NOT care otherwise?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why wouldn't he care unless he knows something we don't or he is gay. Could this steady stream of friends just be friends?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, good and juicy. Thanks!! So does this mean that JK is gay gay?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous1:18 PM

    ew...

    ReplyDelete
  10. I find them odd as a couple, too. I like them both, just, you know, individually.

    ReplyDelete
  11. oooooooooh, she's a beeeeeeeard.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What does 'entertaining' mean exactly? Does she have a lot of male friends, or...?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Holy Shit! I didn't think Enty would reveal that one.

    I guess this is why Michael Buble dropped her ass. He wasn't into "sharing".

    ReplyDelete
  14. Perhaps, he's her pimp. :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Most of us guessed this one but to my knowledge this is the juiciest blind that Ent has ever revealed.

    Can we stop giving Michael Buble so much shit now?

    ReplyDelete
  16. New to this, what a wild ride! Sorry about Emily Blunt, loved her in Prada. Doesn't this make it seem she's bit, uh, insatiable? Poor Jk. Or not.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Like Apple, I thought this one would never be revealed. Juiciest one to date, even though they were the popular guess, I thought ENT would leave this one unanswered.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Aww I <3 Emily blunt she's ma girly crush!

    ReplyDelete
  19. It may not be a "beard" situation, but there are men who, um, can't function sexually and either like to watch or let their women loose, so to speak.

    Now doesn't that sound a lot more juicier than she's a beard? LOL

    ReplyDelete
  20. Is it possible that it's just a case of John being the rebound and that the engagement is just a 'how you like them apples' to Buble? Maybe John is so desperate to hold on to Emily that he will tolerate anything just to keep her around?

    I don't know. Hollywood is weird.

    ReplyDelete
  21. OMG. Never thought Krasinksi was gay. I don't know what to make of this, but super thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  22. OH SHIT....ANOTHER ONE...

    ReplyDelete
  23. Noooooooo...I like them together. Wasn't there some other blind talking about how everyone though the cheater the guy but the relationship ended because of the girls infidelities? Maybe that was Buble and Blunt?

    Hmm....this makes me wonder about Krasinski now. I love him...

    ReplyDelete
  24. My guess is either John is gay or he doesn't love Emily Blunt. Could he be in love with someone else? Sadly, I was in love with someone else when I married my now ex. I did it to make him jealous. I was stupid and immature. I wonder if this is what's going on. Or am I not wanting to believe that John is gay? Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  25. LMAO @ Lisa(not original)

    ReplyDelete
  26. Oooh, they're heating up now!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. There is a new blind about an actress in a new relationship who still wants to get back with her musician boyfriend. Has his music on her ipod. Emily?

    ReplyDelete
  28. NO!!!!!! I refuse to entertain the thought that John is gay, no way.

    Maybe she's just a drug dealer.

    I LOVE Michael Buble, I swear he was singing directly to me at a concert a few years back in Indianapolis. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  29. oh man, this is a big reveal!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Previously to this blind item, I hadn't read anything suggesting that Krasinski was gay. All that was mentionned was a low-key relationship with Rashida Jones, because she was cast in The Office when it was over.

    Sorry but I don't think that Quincy Jones' daughter needs to be the beard for a B list television actor (who might actually have been C list at the time). She's got the money, the name and she's quite private.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I am as cynical, jaded, and been-around-the-block as the next Angeleno my age (mid-40s), and I sincerely don't get a single ping on my gaydar from JK. I think they are each trying to raise their respective profile, but I could be wrong. Remember the truth is always stranger than fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  32. "Maybe she's just a drug dealer."

    hahahaha <33 hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  34. My GayDar has never gone off either. This is a HUGE reveal. Is anyone else feeling as puzzled as me?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I thought she and Anne Hathaway were "special" friends?

    ReplyDelete
  36. I agree, Blunt=drug dealer= hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Wow, I definitely didn't think this one would be revealed, but I didn't think it was anyone else besides these two.

    I honestly don't think John is gay, I think @Kat may be on to something that he's just desperate to keep her around, hence the engagement? She seems like an attention-hound and always seems to have an "I'm enjoying being photographed with America's sweetheart" smirk. She also seems to have gotten much more media attention since they have started dating and even more once they got engaged. He comes off to me as a hopeless romantic who falls hard and fast. And apparently is not above trying to save a relationship with a proposal and an unnecessarily large honker of an engagement ring (which Emily loves to flash). I guess the relationship works for both of them. I don't know which one of them to have less respect for though.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Sorry ladies...I guess JK plays on our team now! Yay!

    ReplyDelete
  39. I now find it interesting how their public relationship changed after this blind was posted. Remember they were quietly dating? Then they got engaged and they were still keeping a low profile. Then shortly after the blind was posted they were photographed all over the place together. What's that all about?

    Sheesh!

    I'm curios to see what's going to happen next.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Aww poor John. I love him.

    ReplyDelete
  41. This is a big reveal. Huh. Well, I don't think JK is gay but I would believe that this relationship is just about exposure. Unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  42. i do believe that the possibility remains that john is gay. gay stereotypes have to be thrown out the window too.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Isn't today a fun day?! Thanks to Enty and to all of you for adding truth, juice and smart comments. Happy 2010!

    ReplyDelete
  44. I KNEW IT!!

    She is gross, seriously. She looks like a whore. Why are they still together?

    Very interested at how their relationship changed after this blind came out. They were really discreet and quiet and then all of a sudden they were all over each other at events. GROSS. I have no respect for her, and I don't get what his deal is now.

    ReplyDelete
  45. From his looks, I wouldn't be surprised if he has low testosterone levels, which might make him not that into sex?

    ReplyDelete
  46. RM said...

    "I'm curios to see what's going to happen next."

    -----

    I can take a guess. They'll pose together at every award show and party they go to during award season. Maybe they'll even announce they've set a wedding date. That would be a nice award season soundbite for them.

    ReplyDelete
  47. John said...

    I can take a guess. They'll pose together at every award show and party they go to during award season. Maybe they'll even announce they've set a wedding date. That would be a nice award season soundbite for them.
    -----
    lol! I doubt if these two last past the Grammys.

    Perhaps Enty performed a "mercy killing" today with this reveal. "John, don't do it man! Think of the STDs!!!"

    I'm guessing their relationship is one big arrangement.

    Why John? Why? So, you can costar in "It's Complicated?"

    Fire your handlers man. Admit to Jenna Fischer that you love her and end this foolish charade.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Buble was caught cheating publicly.
    No, I don't think JK's gay. Nor do I think EB's schtupping anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Maybe she's a dominatrix on the side because if she were dealing her patrons wouldn't just be male. ...unless she's a cheap less embarrassing way to get Viagra.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Emily looks like a walking STD to me, John CLEANSE YOURSELF!

    I hope they don't last past the Grammy's. The thought of them posing on the Golden Globe red carpet makes me want to throw up and then throw things at John.

    I have felt for a while now that Emily wants to get back together with Buble. I could be wrong, but this is all very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Micheal Buble is a tool.

    I trust no one who dated him...argh I take that back..my ex was a tool and I married him..

    I like the domina theory but I AM a bit partial ;)

    I am going with the 'stranger than fiction' guess..

    ReplyDelete
  52. Lets set a time frame for them. Anyone wanna play?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Anonymous4:31 PM

    @chasingheaven - i thought about the drug thing too! lol. i know it's kinda funny, but it could be true. pills, maybe?

    i can't imagine she's a beard, but their relationship did kinda take me by suprise AND i thought it moved along pretty quickly.

    this is an awesome reveal! i wish they were all like this!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  54. I'm a big fan of The Office, but not so much of JK. I used to be, but then I realized he's just a fake Hollywood actor like the rest of them. He gives off this "aw, shucks" image, but he is so controlled by his "people" that it seems totally fake. I've actually thought he was gay long before EB came along, but it is so sad if he feels (or his PR people feel) that he needs to have a "beard" in this day and age. Their relationship has seemed fabricated from the start, and I completely agree with the people who have noticed that their exposure has been totally ramped up ever since this item was published. They used to walk 20 feet apart in the airport to avoid being photographed -- now they're almost Kardashian-like in their need to be seen.

    I've been on other sites where this relationship continues to be defended very passionately ("they're so in love!"), but if you look at it realistically, they're just another pair of self-absorbed H-wood asses that will end up divorced/cheating, etc. if they even make it to the altar.

    This relationship is making them more famous than really anything that they do onscreen. Mainstream America only knows JK as "that guy from The Office" and her from TDWP. It seemed a little too perfect timing-wise for their relationship to "blossom" just as both of their careers are heating up.

    I'm sure after awards season is over, their publicists will release a joint statement that "John and Emily have decided to part ways, but remain close and caring friends." It's all just illusion, people.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anonymous4:37 PM

    if she was dealing her clients wouldn't ALL be male, but the majority mainly would be. AND, any girls that come over the house probably wouldnt really raise any eyebrows, it's only when it's a bunch of dudes that are coming in and out does anyone pay attention.

    who knows.

    this is DEF. juicy!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  56. TatorTot, I'm with you. Hopefully this reveal will hurry the break up along. No need pretending when everybody knows. I thought something was up when they spent Christmas apart. She's in the UK and he's in LA on Christmas and they're engaged? What's up with that?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Tater Toy you are awesome and so spot on. I'm looking forward to hearing them announce "their split."

    Not 100% sure if Emily is John's beard, but I do think they were thrown together for publicity purposes only. Aren't they "managed" by the same people?

    Yeah I find it amusing how much some of John's fans are head over heels in love with Emily, they live in a land of denial. Their relationship suddenly exploded after this blind was revealed. I'd not be surprized if he proposed out of panic. I don't know. They're so not real. She's just so dirty.

    ReplyDelete
  58. RM
    Where did you hear they spent the holidays apart?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Well, to be honest, I didn't hear it. I deducted it. First of all there was this article about Emily spending Christmas in the UK and there was no mention whatsoever of John going with her. Then you see John on the Ellen Show. I think it was on December 18... my bad. I just thought if he was going to be with her on Christmas in the UK it would be in the article the way they've been playing up the "we're so in love" stuff. I'll do a little more digging...be right back!

    ReplyDelete
  60. JK did give an interview at the NYC It's Complicated preem saying he was going home.

    ReplyDelete
  61. I searched and searched and every article I come across says Emily Blunt is going to be in London this Christmas. There is no mention of John. I just find it odd is all. Why don't they say Emily Blunt and John Krasinski plan a London Christmas. That plus what you said ArielAbides about JK's interview and where he was going for Christmas. Also, did anyone see the Conan interview? Was there mention of Conan and John spending Christmas together in Boston?

    ReplyDelete
  62. I don't know these people. But I do know if I were a friend of either of theirs, just knowing what is public knowledge about their individual histories, I would want to tell them they're making a mistake rushing into this. I don't care how many people after this post stories about how they or someone close to them met and married their soul mate quicker than these two are doing, she lived with a guy for three years and when they broke up a few months before meeting JK...she was claims to have been so humiliated she didn't tell her friends for months.

    Those feelings and pains don't just vanish. She didn't take the time to process that before jumping in with this guy. Add to that the fact their private lives are more public gossip fodder and the success rate of Hollywood marriages, you would think someone would tell them to slow down.

    ReplyDelete
  63. In this video clip from the Kimmel Show, Krasinski says that he and Emily will be splitting time between the families.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knNc_TBKSwc&NR=1

    ReplyDelete
  64. Thanks for the link nosygirl. Unfortunately, can't watch it because I don't live in the US. :( By splitting time between the families does that mean they will go to each place together? Like a couple of days in Mass and then a couple of days in the UK? Or does he mean they will spend Christmas separately with their respective families?

    Sorry, didn't mean to turn this into a detective blog! lol!

    ReplyDelete
  65. I heard John say he was going to Boston but in another they were splitting time between the families. It could be all made up though and he was just going to be spending time in Boston with his family ALONE.

    I'm still undecided on if she's his beard of if this is just some tacky publicity stunt. Whatever it is, John you need to get out now.

    ReplyDelete
  66. @RM

    I took Kras to mean that together they would be spending some time over the holidays with each family - splitting their together time between UK and US.

    In a recent article/interview, it was mentioned that Blunt spent the Thanksgiving holiday with Kras and his family in Boston. Obviously, no need for her to go to the UK to celebrate that holiday. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  67. Thank you nosygirl for the clarification. That makes me feel better. I think! lol!

    ReplyDelete
  68. I don't think that really clarifies anything though. They could just be saying they were splitting the holidays between their families. I'm still shocked and ecstatic this blind was revealed. Maybe someone will slap John and tell him he's making a huge mistake.

    Like someone said (sorry I can't remember) but Emily was with Buble for years, she split in July and they started dating in November. Yeah she moves pretty quickly. I don't know how she managed to get over her break up so fast.

    Please let him see the light of day. If she is his beard, dump her, no one cares you're gay lol

    ReplyDelete
  69. skittlekitty won!

    SkittleKitty said...
    Oh no, not Emily Blunt and John Krasinski!
    Anyone else this could be?

    2:27 PM

    ReplyDelete
  70. I should have asked Jenna Fischer when I had the chance. I just didn't want to be one of THOSE people! :)

    ReplyDelete
  71. Also, it doesn't really say she's cheating on him. Just that she has men over at his home when he's gone. Maybe this is a Ceasar's wife type of deal where its not adulterous activity but a practice that is inappropriate and disrespectful to your partner.

    ReplyDelete
  72. i remember Justin Timberlake's speech in Golden Globes nomination when he said someone will have a good night(Blunt and Krasinski are nod):you're an idiot,JT!

    ReplyDelete
  73. I have heard from numerous other sources and yeah, she isn't a nice person. I feel sorry for him. Run John RUN!

    ReplyDelete
  74. ArielAbides I think you are on something here. The blind says she's entertaining these men. What exactly does entertaining mean?

    She could be getting high with them and hanging out but not necessarily shagging them.

    In fact it could be a cultural thing. She is from the UK after all and perhaps males and females hang out there and its no big deal.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Amanda, what makes you think Emily might want to get back together with Buble?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Oh no I was just assuming, no hard evidence when it comes to Buble. I do find it amusing though how quickly she moved from one to the other.

    ReplyDelete
  77. I had my doubts about this relationship even before this blind item. Like many people, I don't understand how Emily could have gotten over her breakup so quickly and am wondering if part of her reason for announcing her engagement is to stick it to Buble a bit.
    I think the relationship is about exposure like many others on here. Both John and Emily have been promoting projects practically nonstop since announcing the engagement (especially after this blind came out). They each are getting more press than ever before and the engagement has provided them with a lot of material for interviews and red carpet sound bytes.
    As for why John's staying with her, I think he'll be able to boost his nice guy image and gain a lot of sympathy after the breakup if the tabloids can run a headline saying that John is "heartbroken over his broken engagement." JKras fans will rally around him wondering how anyone could ever hurt their Jim Halpert.
    @Amanda, I'll set a timeline. If Emily doesn't get nominated for an Oscar, I think they'll be over by the Grammy's. If she is nominated, I think they'll breakup soon after the Oscars.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Sorry for all the flip flopping on this. I just don't want to believe it.

    After thinking about this some more here's my final answer:

    Both of them were rebounding.

    I think someone said it best when they said that John fell hard for Emily and he proposed. Emily accepted the proposal one, because I truly believes she cares for John and two, to rub it in Buble's face.

    Unfortunately, John found out after proposing that Emily was a whore (Sigh... I know what entertaining means. Who was I trying to kid). He wants to end it gracefully though. I'm sure his handlers are advising him to be careful as to how he does it, given both their careers. And let's face it, John's relationship with Emily has given him some rather nice perks(meeting the Queen of England for example)

    The signs are there for a breakup. First, they were talking about a June wedding, Emily's bridal dress designer was picked out, there was mention of a destination wedding and now both of them are saying they are too busy to set a wedding date and there are no wedding plans. Emily was even whining about her mother pushing her to marry quickly (Mother knows best)

    This engagement is over. Won't last past the awards ceremonies like everyone is predicting.

    IMO, if John Krasinski goes through with this engagement and marries Emily Blunt he is gay and she is a beard.

    If he breaks it off gracefully, he's a smart guy. A very smart guy.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I once flat-out asked a comedian from Vancouver who toured with Buble during his time with Emily whether or not he cheated. After hemming and hawing, the comedian finally said "Well, what do you expect when you're a sex symbol to screaming women?!" Gotcha.

    ReplyDelete
  80. IMO, if John Krasinski goes through with this engagement and marries Emily Blunt he is gay and she is a beard.

    If he breaks it off gracefully, he's a smart guy. A very smart guy.

    Couldn't have said it more perfectly myself.

    I hope he ends it and that he ends it sooner rather than later.

    I know for a fact she's cheated on Buble many times, so I don't see how she'd be any different with John. My uncle played the saxophone on tour with Michael a few years back and it was a known fact then.

    John needs to open his eyes. I really hope they end it soon. Do you think they're waiting for the awards to be over?

    ReplyDelete
  81. Just throwing it out there, but I heave heard that Emily and Buble were in an "open" relationship, which is why their relationship persisted even after the tabloids caught Buble cheating. I'm guessing she finally broke it off when her publicist insisted that it made her look bad. Could be she has the same arrangement with JK, and he's very discrete about his affairs or just doesn't participate.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Michael Buble's engaged!
    http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/buble-engaged_1128039

    ReplyDelete
  83. Anonymous7:26 PM

    Gross! They're walking the red carpet of the Critics Choice Awards together! Ugh... I don't think I can take it. John! Get away from her she is dirty! Please let this publicity-fueled engagement be over already!

    ReplyDelete
  84. I agree totally! But with Buble engaged now, Emily has to put on a good face for awhile doesn't she?

    ReplyDelete
  85. I actually wish she would get back together with Buble and they could just go back to cheating on each other. They deserve each other! It's so irritating that CDAN's the only blog that isn't buying this charade! I'm counting down to when award season is over and they break it off.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Someone on blindgossip.com said that they heard Emily had called off the engagement (this was before the Critics' Choice Awards though). They never responded as to where or why they heard that rumor but I'm looking out for any information that suggests there might be trouble.
    http://blindgossip.com/?p=15117

    ReplyDelete
  87. Who is this at the SAG awards with John? Is it his manager?
    http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/96103955/FilmMagic

    No Emily this time. Wonder why.

    ReplyDelete
  88. That's Tracy Brennan, his agent.

    Emily is in Europe doing promotional interviews for Wolfman.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Thank you nosygirl. I knew she wasn't a date and he's taken her to other awards shows. I just couldn't remember who she was.

    I think its odd though that Emily is in Europe. I thought there was a celebrity sighting of her on January 22 in LA.

    I know, I know, it's called a plane.

    ReplyDelete
  90. I read a tweet early today from someone who shared a flight from London to Berlin with her. Emily must have departed on Saturday since it's probably a 10 hour trip from LA to England. Plus you have to add on the time from London to Berlin.

    All that travel time points to leaving at the very least on Saturday.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I keep coming back to this post to vent my frustrations about how much I hate this couple (mostly Emily)! UGH! Please say they'll be over soon!

    ReplyDelete
  92. Me too! Emily did an interview on KTLA Saturday morning (day of SAG awards). She said a lot of women hate her because she's with John. Maybe that's how she's playing it. She's not doing anything wrong it's just that people hate her and are spreading lies because they are jealous.
    http://theentertainmenthotline.ning.com/video/emily-blunt-ktla-jan-2010

    ReplyDelete
  93. Good RM! I'll continue venting my frustrations to you so I thank you in advance. Question: Since she's so in love with John, I wonder why she didn't respond to the interviewer's comment about how lucky she is to be engaged to John with something like, "I know. I am very lucky aren't I?" or with ANY comment indicating how much she appreciates HIM? Oh wait... I know! She really doesn't think she's all that lucky! Instead, she only says "a lot of women hate me right now." John is so happy to talk about how grateful he is to have her, yet in interview after interview her only response seems to be "too bad he's so short." Yep... she sounds head over heels for sure! Yes Emily, I believe that you don't like to plan things out. In fact, I'll bet that you hate planning so much that you aren't now (nor will you ever) plan a wedding to John Krasinski. Also, going out on a MAJOR limb here because I know a lot of actresses do this pose, but does it seem like in the Rome photocall that she's hiding her left hand rather awkwardly? The ring is still there but it seems like she's very focused on keeping her left hand awkwardly buried in her pocket.

    ReplyDelete
  94. I agree with you 766. Emily didn't seem like she was as in love with John as he is with her. However, I do remember reading in one of her interviews where she said she was not that demonstrative. She blamed it on her British background. I'd love to see an old interview of her when someone asked her about Buble and compare the two

    ReplyDelete
  95. I found a few articles where she talks about Buble. In one, she says "I get tears in my eyes every time I see him onstage. It's overwhelming" and in another, she says that working through the struggles inherent in a long distance relationship are all worth it because of how much they love each other as well as how nice it was to have Buble at her side at the Golden Globe Awards (2007). I may just be grasping at straws but the tone, to me, sounds very different than the tone she uses when she talks about John. The best thing that she can say about John is that he's "a very nice man." There are many men in my life who I would describe as "very nice" but I'm certainly not going to marry all of them. I also think this newer blind sounds a little like her (though it would be a little unbelievable that there are multiple blind items being written about her. She's not that famous). http://blindgossip.com/?p=15558

    ReplyDelete
  96. This whole thing doesn’t surprise me at all. Emily may be all sweet and smiley for the cameras, but in real life she’s a bitch. I have been unlucky enough to meet her a few times, and each and every time she behaves in an ungrateful manner. This is not what we’re talking about though. I honestly believe this to be true, not only have I heard things through the grapevine; she just seems like the type (cheap and slutty.)

    I had no idea who John was until recently, as he is not known here in the UK at all, and let me tell you. I already feel sorry for him. Let’s hope he gets out quickly before they make it down the aisle or before children are involved.

    re the last comment, that other blind sounds like her as well. I'd not be shocked to discover it's her.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Hey Crazy766,

    Just saw the pics of EB in London for the Wolfman Press tour on Lainey, in every shot but one she is again clearly and intentionally hiding her left had and smirking...she still has the ring on as you can see in the last either she has some sort of medical problem with that appendage, or she has officially crossed over into "famewhoreage" and is tyring to stir up crap as to why she's nopt flashing the ring anymore. (Interesting that she's doing this on the cusp of her last chance to get an award nom for her not so epic movie.)

    If thats the case...whatever respect I had for her is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  98. I noticed she is hiding her ring, and it's stupid. She's walking around with her hand in a pocket of her dress... very different to the way she was flashing it aroun in the summer.

    I have a friend who works at Claridges and she was apparently her usual snobby self. Doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

    Why is she standing like this? http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/29012010/13/photo/29012010110047.html

    ReplyDelete
  99. Okay. So I'm not imagining things... she is hiding her hand in a REALLY awkward way. Lainey said a while back (before she got together with John) that there were some rumors that Emily had hooked up with Benicio. Maybe she doesn't want to flash her ring around a former (and/or current) fling?
    http://www.laineygossip.com/Emily_Blunt_single_and_so_much_better_off_without_Michael_Buble_at_LA_premiere_of_Defiance.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=20213

    @Eugenie, I agree. She seems like such a snot.

    ReplyDelete
  100. You guys are so right about the engagement ring. I remember when I was engaged I flashed my ring every chance I got. It is a bit odd that she's hiding it. I'm not surprised to hear that she's a snob either. Time will tell. I think John is out of his league with this one.

    ReplyDelete
  101. No Oscar nomination for Emily which means no last minute publicity train to get an Oscar and the end of her award show run. I'm starting the breakup countdown now. As soon as The Wolfman promotions are over... Hopefully.

    ReplyDelete
  102. In this recent picture. She is obviously hiding her engagement ring or rather the hand that her engagement ring should be on.

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20341145,00.html

    This is starting to sound like a broken record.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Today she's wearing longer sleeves (which make it a little more difficult to see the ring) and staying glued to Benicio's side so that her whole left arm is shielded in almost every shot. As usual, we get an ice queen stare from her in most of the pictures. Emily Blunt is too good for... everything (at least in her head).
    http://www.wireimage.com/ItemListings.aspx?igi=414261&nbc1=1

    ReplyDelete
  104. Enlarge this one from Getty Images and you can see the ring. She is wearing it low. (A little above her knuckle). Probably easier to slip it off that way. ;)

    http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/96407456.jpg?v=1&c=NewsMaker&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921A343B2C87A49D8F57EF876ECCB01FBE116C84A4B218BC69BFB0D03C7958688B3

    ReplyDelete
  105. I noticed she always wears her ring low! I never thought about it being easy to slip off but it totally makes sense. I saw a picture of her back in October where she was on a coffee run (she was in sweats and it looked like she had just rolled out of bed to grab some coffee) and wasn't wearing it. Probably forgot to put it back on for any waiting paparazzi.

    ReplyDelete
  106. I noticed she wears her ring low too. It just makes no sense to me. You are young and still fairly newly engaged, you would WANT to show your ring off. Why is she being so weird and hiding her hand. It makes her look ike a knob IMO.
    Let's hope the countdown starts soon like you think...

    ReplyDelete
  107. She's just landed at LAX apparently

    http://i47.tinypic.com/10n7qm9.jpg

    Looking awful as ever. Wonder if she joined the mile high club with the guy she's walking with?

    ReplyDelete
  108. So over this girl, her snobby attitude, and the slutty rumors surrounding her personal life. Bottom line: John get out now because she's going to hurt you and your reputation.

    ReplyDelete
  109. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  110. What's wrong with this picture? Emily arrives in the LA after promoting her new film in Europe for a week and there's no fiance waiting for her at the airport. Instead she's with male friends. Does this make sense? Also note that for most of the pictures she's hiding the engagement ring with her jacket. The one picture where you can see it, it's very low on her finger right above her knuckle.

    Weird! No Emily, I don't hate you, I don't understand you.

    ReplyDelete
  111. That is odd. This whole situation is odd. Not only did she arrive at the airport with a male friend (no welcoming fiance) but she's also having dinner dates with Hugh Grant. If it were another actress I wouldn't think anything of it. People can have friends of the opposite sex but with Emily I'm very suspicious.
    http://www.accidentalsexiness.com/2010/01/28/hugh-grant-emily-blunt-have-a-dinner-date/

    ReplyDelete
  112. Also, it looks like John was in LA but chose to hang out with a friend on Sunday rather than hang out with his fiance who has been out of the country for more than a week. Interesting...
    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/07/john-krasinski-appreciates-art/

    ReplyDelete
  113. Apparently, there is a reason why John was out art shopping with a friend and not with Ms. Blunt. She chose to be at the Santa Barbara Film festival on Sunday to collect a Chopin Virtuoso award. Has anyone ever heard of these?

    I guess when you can't get nommed for major awards like the SAG's or Oscars, you'll settle for table scrap awards such as these. Even scraps can feed the ego.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Oh please. I’m British and have had a very similar upbringing to Emily. I went to a good school, my parents are lucky enough to have very good jobs… I’m not a bitch. I find it funny that John wasn’t there to meet here. He’d be able to leave work early with enough notice. Plus she arrived home and then went immediately up to Santa Barbara to collect a nonsense award? Yeah that seems like love. You have been apart from your fiancé for a week but you’d rather hobnob it with Sandra Bullock… sounds like Emily.
    I hope this ends soon. I’m so done with Emily. John you need to get the hell out now.
    Emily was in OK magazine this week and interestingly enough she mentioned Buble but not John – does she forget she’s “engaged” to him?

    ReplyDelete
  115. I would like to think that if I won an award, my fiance would come to support me rather than shop for a piece of art, especially if I'd been away from him for almost two weeks and the award ceremony was near the area where we lived (it's not like she was in Sweden getting an award).

    ReplyDelete
  116. Thank you Eugenie for giving us the British perspective. I had a roommate who was British. We were roommates for about a year. She was the nicest person and very down to earth.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  117. http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/10/john-krasinski-emily-blunt-premiere-wolfman/ Emily looked lovely at the Wolfman premiere. Perhaps we should begin the countdown now. She said she was not attending the Academy Awards ceremony. So...

    ReplyDelete
  118. RM, I say yes. I also agree that Emily looked very pretty (although something about her facial expressions say to me that she knows she's pretty. And she thinks she's God's gift). I failed miserably at trying to compliment her but whatever... COUNTDOWN IS ON!

    ReplyDelete
  119. I don't think she's that pretty anymore. I used to, but she seems to think she's the dogs bollocks nowadays and that really bothers me. She isn't anything special without makeup - and I don't mean that to sound mean, but it's true. She has people do her make up for these events, and if the rest of us had the same treatment, we'd all be able to look hot.

    I hope this is the start of the end...

    ReplyDelete
  120. Eugenie, could this be what you're looking for?
    http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_emily-blunt-has-a-crush-on-anthony-hopkins_1346380

    It looks like a start to me. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  121. Ooops! I take it back. I just read another article where she plans to just hang around home, walk the dog, pick up her cello playing again and cook a new meal every night.

    Sounds like she planning to settle down into good old domesticated life.

    Hmm...

    ReplyDelete
  122. When she was on Ellen she says there are still no wedding plans and no date yet. She could be lying but it seems like she's signing up for film after film and has back to back promotions. I really don't see her taking a break from her career to plan a wedding for awhile.

    ReplyDelete
  123. BTW: John watched the Super Bowl at Jimmy Kimmel's house on Sunday instead of being with Emily when she got her award.

    ReplyDelete
  124. I wish she'd take that cello and stick it up her arse. Her recent interviews have started to really bother me. Her venomous response to Twitter – she seems to think she’s so much better than everyone else. You aren’t darling; I hate to break it to you. Why couldn’t she just say Twitter wasn’t for her? Instead she more or less insulted everybody that used it.
    I would love to know how true the no wedding plans are. I just can’t see her taking that long off to be honest. I have read that The Office usually wrap up around April. They got engaged what, six months ago and I honestly don’t think they have done any planning yet – when would they have had time? And six months isn’t really enough time to plan something (and less if they got married in June or July…) and then she has a movie coming out in the summer, so she’ll need to be pimping that. Then John will go back to work at the end of July, right? Then you have him working more or less until Thanksgiving, with a couple of small breaks in between… then Ms. Blunt has another movie out at Christmas.

    God. I really just want them to be finished. Have him find himself a really sweet normal girl. Someone who won’t treat him like shit, like Emily does.

    Someone said there is a new blind going round that sounds like her… any ideas people?

    ReplyDelete
  125. Eugenie-he needs to find someone sweet and normal...like me! :) I already live in LA!

    ReplyDelete
  126. Yeah. Every blind I find now I think "this is totally about Emily," but I really think this one is might be her (even though they're not recently engaged). The "not Katy Perry" part really made me think it's Emily. A lot of people comment about how they look alike.

    http://blindgossip.com/?p=15921

    I agree with you Eugenie. Everything she says always comes out like she's making fun of people or otherwise looking down on them. It may not be intentional but it drives me crazy!

    I say this every time I post but still, make this be over soon!!! John deserves someone MUCH NICER!

    ReplyDelete
  127. Just want to say that after looking at this picture again I noticed that Emily is either about to hold hands with the guy she's with or withdraw her hand from his.

    Did anyone else notice this?

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20341145,00.html

    It gives a new meaning to the article's title eh?

    ReplyDelete
  128. RM, I never noticed that but it TOTALLY looks like she was holding his hand! I was paying so much attention to the odd position of her left hand it never occurred to me. This is old news after all of my posts and I know that I shouldn't say this (as I don't know Emily and she might be the sweetest person ever) but I really REALLY dislike her and this relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  129. On second glance if she was caught holding someone's hand other than her fiance's the left hand is more like putting her hand on her hip. As if to say, "Oh no you didn't!)

    It could have been her brother's hand. Or who knows, it could have been John visiting her in Paris.
    :P

    Question: Would the guy she was with have to give permission to the pap who snapped the picture before it could appear in People?

    ReplyDelete
  130. RM, I'm not sure if they would need permission. If John was visiting her in Paris they would have definitely printed that picture.
    Eugenie, I think your timing sounds correct in terms of when The Office is shooting, etc. I don't think they've done any preparation either. Emily has been promoting projects non-stop since becoming engaged (coincidence?) and this summer she'll have another movie coming out. It really doesn't sound like there's a lot of time for a wedding with she and John's shooting schedules. I think John MIGHT consider taking some time off but I definitely do not think Emily would put anything above furthering her career. Even though she says that she wants to keep her private life private it is blatantly clear that she has gotten a lot of additional press being with John and the engagement has definitely increased her celebrity status. Saying that she wants to remain private just feeds into the image she is carefully trying to craft.
    I do think, however, that we're seeing more signs that this engagement is going to be over soon.

    ReplyDelete
  131. OK, this is getting to be ridiculous now!

    Here's a brief article about the two "lovebirds" at LAX. Read what Emily says about LA

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/20/john-krasinski-emily-blunt-lax-lovebirds/

    Now contrast that with what Emily says about LA in this article.

    http://www.gossipcenter.com/emily-blunt/emily-blunt-dubs-los-angeles-very-clique-ey-279320

    She is a fake and a phony and I hate to say it, but I'm starting to believe John is too.

    ReplyDelete
  132. I'm still holding out a little longer that John fell head over heels for Emily and will put up with anything. I'm getting impatient. It seems to me that Emily is trying hard to project this image that she's not a famewhore and doesn't care about Hollywood, yet the timing of her engagement fits into a crafty plan to increase her celebrity status. I don't think this engagement would have happened if she didn't have films to promote (which is all she's been doing since the engagement) and was not campaigning for an Oscar nod.
    RM, curious to know your thoughts on this blind (posted it before):
    http://blindgossip.com/?p=15921

    ReplyDelete
  133. I read that blind when you first posted it and I was trying to withhold judgment. But, after this latest, publicity stunt I think its her.

    Interesting how they flew somewhere and took no luggage. Interesting how Jared pointed that out. Do you think they really went anywhere?

    ReplyDelete
  134. I was actually wondering if they were dropping off someone at the airport that had been visiting? I really don't know. I wouldn't be surprised if the plan was to make it look like they took a romantic Valentine's day trip to counter rumors that there is trouble in the relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  135. I think you're right.

    Especially since that other article was posted on Jared's blog about her arriving at LAX with some male friends.

    ReplyDelete
  136. There were at least a half dozen tweets about the two of them being in New York City all of last week. His show wasn't filming.

    ReplyDelete
  137. Read this article in People. If they were in NYC all last week how were they also out on the town in West LA with Will Arnett

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20344431,00.html

    ReplyDelete
  138. My assumption is that People is stretching the definition of "days later." Five different tweeters in New York can't all be wrong by chance.

    The first tweet I read -
    Went as "rockabilly @ a funeral" last night, saw John Krasinski @ dinner, watched people do exercises on the floor at Edendale. JTree tmrw!
    1:46 PM Feb 15th from Echofon

    Second -
    so jealous lucia saw john kraskinski and emily blunt at JFK!
    5:00 PM Feb 15th from txt

    Third -
    FAIRLY certain i just passed john krasinski on the street. someone prove me wrong, please, b/c my heart is aflutter. haha
    2:14 PM Feb 16th from TweetDeck

    Fourth -
    At Momofuku noodle bar staring into the baby blues of Jim Halpert (the office)
    4:48 PM Feb 16th from Tweetie

    Fifth - from the Spotted Pig
    John krasinski from the office just walked in
    1:30 AM Feb 17th from Twitterrific

    ReplyDelete
  139. Thanks for the clarification. Interesting that only one of the twitters includes Emily and in that one they saw them at JFK. If they saw both of them in NYC wouldn't they say Emily and John?

    ReplyDelete
  140. Most likely they'd include her if they recognized her, I guess.

    However, most of the tweeters were female. Maybe they just chose to ignore the woman who stole their man. lol

    ReplyDelete
  141. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  142. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  143. ::frowny face::
    My source was ill informed. Glad for the correction.

    ReplyDelete
  144. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  145. Sounds like a very quick trip across the country.

    ReplyDelete
  146. They set a date for the wedding!

    http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/news/article_1535553.php/Emily-Blunt-and-John-Krasinski-plan-to-get-wed-in-June

    ReplyDelete
  147. I don't know. That's an old rumor that's been going around for awhile saying that it was going to be a June wedding (like since October). They might have actually set a June wedding date or that might just be a popular rumor. Emily said on Ellen that they hadn't done any planning and that they were "useless" when it came to setting a date, etc. She could be fibbing, but I don't think we should get overly excited about that June wedding report just yet. I REALLY don't think she's going to go through with it. I'm placing a bet now: that girl is going to break John's heart within the next few months.

    ReplyDelete
  148. You're right! I remember when they first got engaged there was talk of a June wedding and that same gown designer.

    May be the same old #hit different day like you said 766.

    Do you think they're keeping tabs on this blog? lol!

    ReplyDelete
  149. Ha! I don't know. It did seem like their public appearances together increased drastically after the blind was first written. Maybe not this blog specifically but they may know that not everyone believes they are "so in love" like People Magazine claims.
    There are some recent pictures where I swear it looked like you could tell that Emily had noticed the pap over her shoulder so she put her arm around John and then moved in closer to him for a wonderful "look how much I love my man" kind of pose. I could be reading too much into everything. I am TOTALLY biased when it comes to this couple (as one can tell in previous posts).

    ReplyDelete
  150. I'm hoping the June wedding is just a rumour and that it isn't actually going to happen.

    I've seen the candids going around of the two of them walking their dog this weekend and they have made me want to vomit. She sees the camera and her whole face changes. She suddenly turns in to this coy little, so very much in love kinda girl... I'm not buying it. As soon as she sees the pap, her arms round him, steaking her claim.

    Sick. I'm ashamed to admit I used to be her fan. I just took one of her DVD's to the local OXFAM shop today HA!

    ReplyDelete
  151. Anonymous6:28 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Anonymous6:33 PM

    So you know what I mean!!! Did you notice that there have been a lot more "candids" since this BI was revealed and especially within the past week. 4 days straight?

    ReplyDelete
  153. Anonymous6:40 PM

    Actually that's 5 days in a row of Emily out and about... total coincidence.

    ReplyDelete
  154. I think it's all publicity for The Wolfman movie which according to the reviews is not too good.

    Anybody see it?

    ReplyDelete
  155. lol! Is this what you guys are talking about? Re: Emily fawning over John when she sees the paps.

    Look at the pics before this one. And the one after it is so funny to me. Seems John could care less that his honey is hugging him.


    http://socialitelife.celebuzz.com/archive/2010/02/23/emily_blunt_john_krasinski_love_on_the_rocks_miu_says.php?img=7&gfmt=e

    ReplyDelete
  156. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  157. Apparently, Mr. K has "quietly" relisted their current "lovenest" for sale less than one year from purchasing it.

    http://realestalker.blogspot.com/2010/03/your-mama-hears.html

    ReplyDelete
  158. That's interesting. I can understand the need to sell a house for whatever reason. But, why do it right in the middle of planning a wedding? Wouldn't the timing be all wrong? I wouldn't think he would need the money right now as the Office is doing well and he's been in some decent movies lately. Hmm...

    ReplyDelete
  159. Quietly putting their house on the market seems odd to me, especially when the economy is so low and when they’re supposed to be planning a wedding. I have never had to sell a house before, but I can imagine it’s stressful. Didn’t they only buy that house TOGETHER last year? I can’t imagine them buying it with the knowledge that they would sell it in a year – the economy was poor then. If that was their intention all along, they were both very poorly guided in my opinion. Secondly, I do see them moving because they want to extent their family just yet. Again, they bought this place a year ago TOGETHER… they would have been aware their “relationship” was somewhat serious, the topic of children would have come up. Same goes for their dog. They knew then they would need a place for the dog to play, so I can’t see either of those being a reason for their move. This just seems extremely fishy to me

    Oh look. Emily went out AGAIN, this time with Amy Adams. Could she be anymore of an attention whore? That ring is looking bigger and tackier the more I look at it.

    I want to wake up in the morning to the annoucement they're over.

    ReplyDelete
  160. Interesting. Like Eugenie said, the house they bought together (when I presume they were thinking about where the relationship would go next) is now for sale but John's old place was taken off the market a few months ago. Sell the "lovenest" before the bachelor pad?

    ReplyDelete
  161. Another series of pap shots of the hot, engaged couple. Yeah. They really look so in love. ;)

    http://x17online.com/gallery/view_gallery.php?gallery=eblunt030510_x17

    ReplyDelete
  162. WTF? Why does every other blog insist on calling them "such a cute couple"? They look miserable together. Did they have some sort of spat when the movie was over? John is practically running away from her in most of those shots. This combined with the weird real estate moves... if I were a tabloid writer I'd start prepping my "Emily and John: The Final Days" piece.

    ReplyDelete
  163. Thank you, crazy766. WTF indeed. I couldn't have said it any better.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Ditto. I couldn't have said that any better myself. These two are getting weirder and weirder.

    ReplyDelete
  165. Oh look. New pictures of the "happy couple," this tme they're at a pre oscar party.

    http://img136.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98981_01_122_107lo.jpg

    http://img248.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98993_02_122_409lo.jpg

    http://img192.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99000_03_122_720lo.jpg

    They probably didn't know these were being taken - look how fed up John looks, and she - she looks wasted and pissed off.

    "Happy Couple," my ass!!!

    ReplyDelete
  166. Lately John ALWAYS looks pissed when he's with Emily. This "happy couple" is falling apart.

    ReplyDelete
  167. I hope so, I really hope so. But seriously, add those to the cold as ice movie pictures... what is their deal geez!

    ReplyDelete
  168. I hope so, I really hope so. But seriously, add those to the cold as ice movie pictures... what is their deal geez!

    ReplyDelete
  169. It certainly looks like John is pissed off about something and Emily looks pretty sad.

    Judging by the clothes they are wearing they didn't walk the red carpet for the Oscars.

    This doesn't look like something simple like having a spat over which party to go to next.

    What I find even more interesting is someone took these pictures. Is someone trying to expose "the happy couple" for what they truly are?

    ReplyDelete
  170. That was a pre oscar party on Friday, I don't think they went to any parties or the actual Oscar's yesterday... and I don't know why they would. She wasn't nominated for anything.

    Wouldn't that be great if someone was trying to expose them? I can't get over their expressions, add those movie pictures in to the whole thing and this little scenario gets weirder by the minute!

    ReplyDelete
  171. I'm starting to feel bad for them (and bad for making fun of them.. err... making fun of Emily. I mostly just made fun of/insulted Emily). I still think their relationship is a sham but I don't know. They just seem unhappy and not one of those couples that look really pissed that they're having their picture taken while walking the dog. There seems to be an element of unhappiness even when it really doesn't look like they know they're being photographed. I still don't really like Emily or think they should get married but if they are as unhappy together as they often look (almost every time they're NOT posing on the red carpet) then it just seems like we're watching two unhappy and insecure people go through the motions of a doomed relationship. I suddenly feel conflicted over my love of celebrity gossip.

    ReplyDelete
  172. I hear you crazy766. That's why I deleted one of my posts. What this experience is showing me is that these two people do care about each other. Otherwise there wouldn't be so much pain. If you don't care about someone you could care less what they do. But, perhaps I'm just a hopeless romantic. Sigh...

    ReplyDelete
  173. See - I'd feel sorry for them if I thought this relationship was real and that they're honestly unhappy, but I still firmly believet heir relationship is based around PR.

    ReplyDelete
  174. FishNChips when you say its based around PR do you mean you think they have never ever felt anything at all for each other?

    Like they don't even share a bed? And the whole thing is completely phony?

    Or do you think that at first they were in to each other, realized it wasn't going to work and decided to milk the relationship for all it was worth before calling it quits?

    Either way, that's pretty screwed up on both their parts.

    I'd like to think that one or both of them had feelings for the other.

    Going back to hide my head in the sand now.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Don't stop posting RM, K? I love hearing your thoughts on all of this.

    At first I thought they had just been put together - no bed sharing, just purely for PR reasons. But the more I thought about it, the more I think they were probably just introduced by their management, hit it off - and like you said, at first they liked each other, realised it wasn't going to work and decided to milk the relationship for all it was worth.

    I'd like to think they were smarter than this,but who knows. I just do not trust Emily.

    ReplyDelete
  176. I hope you don't stop posting here RM. I really like hearing what you have to say on the matter - an what you think the deal is!!!

    I used to think they were just put together purely for PR reason at first, but I believe they were introduced by their management and at first, really liked each other. Realised this wasn't going to work andl ike you said - decided to milk the relationship for all it was worth. They don't look happy together, they haven't for a while. Their behavior changes once they see the cameras, it's just fishy to me.

    You'd think they were smarter, but who the hell knows.

    ReplyDelete
  177. Thank you FishNChips! I won't stop posting. I just thought that kind of thing didn't happen in Hollywood anymore with management putting people together. But, sigh, I guess it still exists. I just don't want to believe it. To be honest with you I don't trust Emily either. Some say it's just the way she carries herself and once you get to know her she's really nice. I'm not buying it. Too many people have posted here that they have met her and she's not nice. She seems very savvy. John on the other hand seems sincere. After all, didn't he have a talk with one of the talk show hosts who knew Emily and that convinced him to propose? Or was that all made up too? I would think the talk show host would call him out on that one. I'd like to think that he's trying to be a gentleman about the whole thing and end it quietly. He must realize by now that Emily is not the "lady" he thought she was.

    That is what I hope John is like. I want to continue liking him and too many people say he's genuinely nice.

    Time will tell.

    ReplyDelete
  178. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  179. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  180. I saw this and almost threw up a little...
    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20351384,00.html
    So many questions: Do you think this really happened or is it a clever tip to People magazine from someone's PR person? I was starting to wonder if John was staying at his old bachelor pad after seeing he and Emily together looking so miserable.
    What a difference a week makes I guess! The pictures from last weekend definitely do not look like a couple that makes out in public (or anywhere).

    ReplyDelete
  181. I guess they kissed and made up. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  182. RM- You are much nicer than me. I just go from 0 to bitter b**** in 2 seconds with this couple! Still not entirely sure I buy the sighting but whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  183. It seems out of character to me. They did so much in the beginning to keep their relationship "quiet" and now they go all out and make-out in a crowded restaurant full of celebrities??? Knowing full well everybody and their grandmother is going to see it??? As MY grandmother would say, "It don't make no kinda sense to me!"

    Who knows, they may have been "under the influence."

    ReplyDelete
  184. I think you're correct, crazy766, in that this may have been a publicist's tip to People.

    This group of celebs reads like a laundry list of couples John and Emily have reportedly been seen with/ known to associate with. Unless this was a private party, I find it hard to imagine a small army of celebs descending on a restaurant together. How could they enjoy themselves with the attention from other diners they would most likely receive?

    I also agree with you, RM. The report of "making out " at the table seems wildly out of character for these two.

    ReplyDelete
  185. It reminds me of a post on popsugar I thought was weird about John and Emily having dinner with George Clooney about two weeks ago. There were pictures of George and his gf but John and Emily managed to avoid all of the paparazzi George would have drawn in? I know. I know. It's a bit of a stretch to assume that someone's pr person made up both items. They probably just entered and left through the back but you never know with these two? Just thought it was a interesting commonality: stories from "sources" about John and Emily having dinner with famous friends. No photos just sightings.
    http://www.popsugar.com/Photos-George-Clooney-Elisabetta-Canalis-Emily-Blunt-John-Krasinski-Getting-Dinner-Together-7620964

    ReplyDelete
  186. Does anyone else here share in my impression that these two are being hyped well beyond their actual acting accomplishments and presence in Hollywood?

    I believe it was Tater Tot in an earlier post here in comments that said that basically, she's that girl from "The Devil Wears Prada" and he's that guy from "the Office".
    This all seems a bit absurd to me.

    ReplyDelete
  187. I just don't believe all the stories about them having dinner with all these celebrity pals. We know they're friends, but it's funny how they got pictures of clooney and none of the famous couple. It just seems fishy to me.
    I think it's being used by their people to just get their name out there.

    Anyone see the pictures from the pet store? None of them actually together, just pictures of them seperately. Him holdin the stuffm her walking out looking like a tramp, thinking she's all that. To think I used to love her and wish I looked like her :(

    ReplyDelete
  188. Eugenie- where are the pictures of Emily at the pet store? I just saw John and the dog. I didn't think she was there.

    ReplyDelete
  189. Never mind I found them but seriously? Is she leaving without him? I'm confused. I almost thought that they went to the same store at different times. She just darted out to the car leaving John inside with all their stuff and the dog.

    ReplyDelete
  190. Here's a link to a recent Emily interview:

    http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20100318-259516/Emily-Blunt-BF-John-Krasinski-is-no-wolfman

    ReplyDelete
  191. Nope, they were there at the same time, but you seriously wouldn't know it by looking at the pictures.

    I am still doubtfull about a June wedding...

    ReplyDelete
  192. Nope, they were there at the same time, but you seriously wouldn't know it by looking at the pictures.

    I am still doubtfull about a June wedding...

    ReplyDelete
  193. Yeah they were there together, although you'd not know it by the pictures. I find that really strange, their behaviour in general is just really odd.
    I'm still hopeful that June wedding is all bollocks and that he still has time to run away.

    ReplyDelete
  194. How interesting? There's a story from Star magazine saying that John and Emily were having so much fun giggling and laughing when they went to see Alice and Wonderland (you know... when we all thought they looked miserable together coming out of the movie?). I guess they were exhausted from being SO SO HAPPY together during the movie. All these anonymous sources reporting what a great couple they are together.
    http://www.starmagazine.com/john_krasinski_emily_blunt/news/16646

    ReplyDelete
  195. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  196. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  197. x17 has posted pics ( an unwarranted 70, to be exact ) from Amy Adams' baby shower this past weekend. Blunt was one of the guests. Several shots of her holding up her left arm in an unnatural way, as if it were in an invisible sling, to better exhibit the bling.
    We get it, Emily. You're engaged. By the way, according to the title Blunt and Debra Messing are "A-list" celebs.Yeah. Right up there with the likes of Streep and Hepburn. ;)

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days