Monday, May 04, 2009

WTF Is Vanity Fair Thinking?

Vanity Fair is one of my favorite magazines. I think they do a great job of mixing fluff articles with great investigative reporting and have fantastic photos. With all of that being said, I'm shocked that Jessica Simpson is going to be their June 2009 cover. Ummm. Why? Yes, if you get past the fact that she doesn't close her mouth in any of the 8 photos below and seems to have the same vapid, vacant expression in all but one, the photos are ok to look at. Those are photos though. Does she really deserve a cover on one of the most famous magazines of all time? What has she done to deserve it? According to the article her clothing empire is a $400M a year business. Uh huh. I would love to see the books on that. Is that cover worthy? I don't think so. The article itself is ok, because the reporter is not afraid to take some shots at her and tells us, the readers the questions he has been told he cannot ask. Umm. Weight? You got it. Jessica also will not talk about Nick Lachey, although she did say she hasn't spoken to him in years. But is all of this cover worthy? Was there no other person in the world who would be a better cover? Read the article here.







36 comments:

  1. Could someone tell me, why is this person a celebrity? And I agree w/Enty, WTF has happened to Vanity Fair that THIS is the cover story?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:01 AM

    Her plastic boobs look bigger hahaha.

    Still wondering if Romo finally got smart and broke up with her.

    Really can't stand this bimbo.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And it's not like there are no summer blockbusters to promote. I have to imagine that they had a different/better cover lined up, and the subject flaked for whatever reason.

    ReplyDelete
  4. did papa simpson grease some palms? does those types of things go on behind the scenes?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The reporter takes more than a few stabs at her in that article. It kind of seemed like they didn't understand how she was really relevant, either.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Vanity Fair started going downhill for me as soon as they started kissing TomKat's ass. That puff piece they wrote and the heavily airbrushed photos of an infant truly disgusted me.

    Showcasing Jessica Simpson just shows how out of touch they are with what people really care about. Or they just got a HUGE payout from Papa Joe, Jess, and Co.

    She looks like a brain-dead duck-billed platypus in these pictures. They literally made me wince!

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is as bad as the Kimoroa issue.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now that they don't have George W. Bush to kick around any more, Vanity Fair is lost in the wilderness.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Next month's cover model: Octomom. Believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jessica doesn't deserve the cover, and neither did Gisele Bündchen last month either.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That reporter is a jerk.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Like I've said a hundred times...she needs to do a Playboy spread.

    ReplyDelete
  14. What are those things on her face?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I also thought the pictures were surprisingly good until I got to the third Neanderthal fly-catching expression. Shut your mouth!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I like her shoes and bags, but I'm surprised she's on the cover.

    I love VF too but mostly for the old Hollywood stories and I always liked reading Dominic Dunne's diaries.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The publishing industry is hurting. Perhaps she game them a discount? lol

    ReplyDelete
  18. She looks like a blonde Eva Mendes in some of the photos ... the 2nd from the top especially made me think it.

    I think she's very pretty to look at. I know she's a disaster whenever she opens her mouth, but she's pretty.

    The photographer is guilty of being a one-shot wonder; he could have asked for more than an open mouthed dazed look, but watching ANTM, that seems to be what they all want now.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sigh. I hope that wasn't real fur ;)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Doesn't matter what she does in photos. She will always look like a tranny. She's ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  21. VF is the only magazine i subscribe to. i just DON'T understand how she rated a story, let alone a cover. who's she fucking at VF to get that kind of publicity??

    this chick can't sing, she can't act. why are we even talking about her?? i feel a letter to VF coming on.....

    ReplyDelete
  22. so over the hate.

    she looks better than i did on Vanity Fair!

    ReplyDelete
  23. So a story about how there isn't really anything to say about her? Except that maybe it's time to look at her boobs again? I just don't get it.

    She seems like a decent enough person but it would be better for everyone, including her, if she were just allowed to fade away.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Does she really deserve a cover on one of the most famous magazines of all time? What has she done to deserve it?Oh, I think we know what she's done to deserve it....

    /makes international sign of the blowjob

    ReplyDelete
  26. califblondy, totally agree with your statement regarding the articles in VF. I first learned about Dominick Dunne through an article he wrote years and years ago and have read everything I could get my hands on that he wrote. Love his style and his insider stories. As far as VF and JS, much like a neutered dog, I just dont get it...VF was always the the mag I could count on to find great articles about things people care about, not shitty articles about someone I could care less about. What is their deal?

    ReplyDelete
  27. I am slso not that impressed with the pictures. I guess they were trying to get her out of her "Daisy Duke" stereotype, but that is her best look to date.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think she looks sexy.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Mario Testino is pretty talented as a shooter because these look good considering the subject. He's got a nice sense of composition and his lighting choices are excellent in this portfolio.

    Without deft photography and rigorous editing, I think this particular woman is kind of "blah" She's not unattractive by any stretch of the imagination, but this set of shots makes her look a lot better than she has in a long, long time.

    ReplyDelete
  30. She paid them to allow her on, in their magazine. So obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  31. What the hell is going on with her nose?

    Jax - Wait, you were on VF??

    ReplyDelete
  32. Aww come on. Still not understanding the Jessica Simpson hate. Several young women I know love her clothing and shoe lines. She appears to be largely successful, even if you're counting her singing-at-the-county-fair career. Looks like she's doing well for herself. And I certainly don't trust public opinion concerning her looks. I like her AND her lantern-jawed smile. It makes her different.

    ReplyDelete
  33. She's newsworthy in that her weight was an internet issue just a month or so ago. I don't care about her, but I think she's as deserving of a VF cover as anyone else out there. What else would we be getting?

    ReplyDelete
  34. She looks like a dead Stepford Wife in the third shot.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days