I have a question for you. It is one of morality and where someone draws the line at making a buck. The above photo was taken of Miley Cyrus by a photographer working for Flynet, or at least who sold the picture to Flynet. As you can see, I got it from another website and the wardrobe malfunction was covered up. This is a 16 year old girl who had her photo taken from what looks to be about a mile away. The person who took the photo obviously took the photo while Miley's breast was exposed. Instead of just deleting the photo, the person obviously kept it and then sent it on to Flynet or whatever agencies they were trying to sell the photo to. Flynet then distributed it to the site I got it from. Did they distribute it with the block in place or did they leave it up to the person buying it to cover the breast?
If it was sent without the portion covering the breast, then I would say that the person should be investigated for distributing child pornography. If they kept the original photo on their camera or downloaded it to their computer, they should be investigated for possessing child pornography. If this had been any other 16 year old girl everyone would be disgusted and I hope the photographer would not have taken the photo. I understand the photographer was taking photo after photo in this situation and I don't blame them for taking the shot they took, because honestly they might not have even noticed they did take it until they looked at the photos. Apparently she caught the mistake very quickly.
My big, big issue with this is that once the photographer saw the naked breast, the photo should have been deleted. Gone. Destroyed. Instead they decided to make a buck off it and the agency that bought it is also trying to make a buck off it. How many people now possess the naked photo of Miley? How many people have seen it? Would you let someone get away with this if it was your child and she was riding a horse and a photographer took her photo? Of course you wouldn't.
I think most of us have issues with Miley and especially her parents, but no one deserves this kind of treatment, embarrassment or potentially illegal behavior to happen to them. She was, according to the photographer, wearing a low cut dress, and her breast popped out. I think the FBI should investigate, and should determine what went on here and to make sure it never happens again.
no kidding!
ReplyDeletetrainwreck family....and is she wearing a wedding dress in that photo ?? WTF even if its for a video...ummm hello she's 16 ?
ReplyDeleteDon't be so hyperbolic, EL. A boob flash from a 16-year-old isn't child pornography. Pornography is something designed to appeal to prurient interests, or, in other words, something designed and intended to get your rocks off. This ain't that.
ReplyDeleteunfortunately these 'photographers' aren't photogs at all, but lowlife scumbags who bought a camera to make a couple bucks while living in LA. if you actually needed a license to be a Pap, half these losers would be deported. and i'm not just talking Mexico, they are coming in from all over to ruin what was once an artform.
ReplyDeletewhat pimp said....
ReplyDeletenow i have to go pound one out.
I'd have more sympathy for Miley if she didn't already take inappropriate pictures of herself years ago.
ReplyDeleteShe is only 16 and the person that took the pic obviously has no morals or it wouldn't have made its way to the internet. But then I never pegged the paps as having any morals anyway. But I also have feeling Miley won't care and thats sad.
ReplyDeleteI agree 100% - should have been immediately deleted. She may be a "product," and a willing one, but she is still a child.
ReplyDeleteYou guys, most of the people at pollsb dont even think it's a nip slip... wtf? :)
ReplyDeleteTake a look:
http://www.pollsb.com/polls/p2079860-considered_miley_cyrus_nipple_slip#results
I'm from the UK so don't have that built in horror about sex and 16yr olds.
ReplyDeleteThat said, the "pap" and the agency need to rethink their moral stance.
I think that given Miley's behavior with regard to sexually suggestive photos and the possibility that she did this intentionally (to get Justin's attention), I think it's fair to have been distributed in a censored form as "newsworthy". Any uncensored versions should have been destroyed.
ReplyDeleteI'm remembering Miley's wet duck pout, bug eyed face in the shower. Ewwww. I don't think she'll care unless she's not making a buck out of it. She may be a child, but she's still a ho IMHO.
ReplyDeleteCome on, people. Whether she's acted inappropriately for her age in the past or not, taking photos of a child's exposed breast and distributing them was a decision made by an ADULT. It should be up to the adult in the situation to protect the child, no matter how deserving or undeserving of such protection you deem the child to be. This is one of those situations where you err on the side of protecting the child. This was purely for monetary gain. Shame on the pap. I agree that the picture could have been taken accidently, but once discovered, it is the adult's obligation to delete it, sight unseen by another soul.
ReplyDeleteThat's pretty disgusting and reprehensible to knowingly distribute pictures of an minor like that, but it's hard to feel much sympathy for Miley when she's already taken several slutty pictures herself. I know that doesn't make it right or okay either way, but you know as soon as she turns 18 she'll be joining the ranks of other celebutards who "forget" they weren't wearing panties when exiting cars. I feel disgust toward the photographer and agency for distributing the photos, and scorn for trash like Miley who seemingly welcome it.
ReplyDeleteSince this little slut doesn't give a damn about morality, she should have at least worn a bra and avoided this from happening. Being the way she is for wanting attention wouldn't doubt that she had something to do with the malfunction.
ReplyDeletei don't know that i'd classify it as porn, but the ethical, moral, decent thing to do would be to delete it. of course anyone with a lens that shoots a mile away isn't eithical, moral OR decent.
ReplyDeleteChild porn? Maybe teen porn. I don't really know American laws or anything but in Canada she is over the age of consent.
ReplyDeleteNot that that makes it right
p.s. it's just a boob. It's not like it was full on sex from a mile away, locked indoors with the curtains closed.
ReplyDeleteI agree the adult should have deleted any photos of boobage, but websites distributed the pics she took of herself in the shower. Different photographer, more porny than this photo.
ReplyDeleteGoing with the pimp (heh) on this one; this is not pornography by far. And she's 16 already, maybe I'm being to European about this, but lighten up, it's just a boob.
ReplyDelete