When Khloe Kardashian was busted for wearing fur not too long before her naked PETA ad came out, instead of just saying that she was doing the PETA thing in order to stay in the public eye and try and be relevant for something other than being the sister of someone who got famous for making a sex tape with Brandy's brother, she decided to go ahead and spin a bunch of crap.
Apparently the same people that let Mischa Barton have a website have also decided to allow Khloe to have a website. I guess the criteria for getting a celebrity website is that at some point you had to have your photo taken at an event and not be a caterer. So, here is what Khloe had to say about her fur wearing not so distant past.
She says that there are tons of photos of her wearing fur and that she was a real fur fan. Then PETA approached her and she said, "hell yeah I will give up fur if you do one of those naked things of me and I can have my own red carpet event where my sister is not the star."
She actually said something more along the lines of she saw a video PETA showed her and immediately swore off fur. Uh huh. If some furrier said here is $1M to wear one of our furs and be on television everyday Khloe would be on her "blog" talking about how the animal was killed humanely or something like that. Now, if I could just find someone who would pay her more than $20 for anything.
Holy crap. The things they can do with Photoshop these days.
ReplyDeleteAww, don't be so hard on her. She's young, and not completely unattractive; I'm sure she could get at least $50 for a half-and-half.
ReplyDeleteGeez! I thought that was Chynna(sp)
ReplyDeleteIts funny but I am not a PETA stan at all, however it has always made me laugh how they never throw paint or go after Black or Latino celebrities. Oh they may mention them but you never see anyone throw red paint on Mary J. Blige and live to tell about it lol
ReplyDeleteHere are my thoughts - Enty, if you don't give her any space on your blog, I won't complain about reading it. And, if you do give her space on your blog, I promise not to read it.
ReplyDeleteat least you got the names right this time ent.
ReplyDeletepeta's new scare film involves rabbits and donna karan. it's pasted all over one of my favorite sites and i'm not the only one complaining about it.
ReplyDeletei have decided that when the animals take over, the should take all the peta people first and slaughter them cruelly, all the while taking pictures for THEIR ad campaign!
Ok, so Khloe's dad had to have been brilliant, being O.J.'s lawyer and all. How come he misspelled all of his children's name with an erroneous K? Why aren't his kids super brainy and going to Harvard? I thought intelligence was supposed to be genetic, unless Mr. Kardashian also carried stupid skank who likes to shop a lot genes. That must have been it.
ReplyDeletebionic bunny- i am slightly offended by your comment about peta. Yeah, they get a bad rap for their scare tactics but so what? Is it so hard for you to watch what actually goes on in the making of animal fur coats? I meet many people who act derisivelly when i mention being part of peta and while i dont participate with most of what they do i think it is wrong to blame them and shit on them all the time. We need a voice for animals, lord knows there is a voice for kids and everyones else. They cant speak up and they are being inhumanlly hurt. Why dont you grow a heart and try to see it from another perspective.
ReplyDeleteAs long as PETA remembers that humans are animals and apply the same "ethical treatment" to them, I don't have a problem with it. Since they delight in scaring humans and making them queasy, they need to run along and make some bunnies vomit. :)
ReplyDeleteJasmine, I agree in theory with PETA, but I don't like some of the extreme shock tactics they use. I think they risk turning people away from the cause. It can be a very good thing to push the limits, but when you're doing that, you risk going too far sometimes. It's good for PETA to challenge people, but it's also good for the people to tell them when they've gone too far, imo.
ReplyDeleteAnd I know Bunny was just joking around - she is one of the most passionate animal lovers you'll ever meet. This blog encourages hyperbole for comic/snark effect. :)
alright mooshki, i'll chill out... i agree that some things are too out there. but sometimes that is neccasary with some people. anyway, its cool. i will breath in and out and it will all be okay. :p
ReplyDeleteYeah, Jasmine, I've gotta defend Bunny here, since I'm a huge animal rights person and am COMPLETELY on your side here: Bunny loves animals as much as anyone. Wouldn't care two shits about her if she didn't, to be honest! She is NOT someone who lacks compassion -- no one has to worry about Bunny donning fur or snacking on veal or whatever.
ReplyDeleteI love PETA for their clandestine whistleblowing operations -- they've done a LOT to expose the previously-hidden horrors or fur factories, laboratories, and slaughterhouses -- and have ultimately changed the animal welfare movement for the better, but I totally agree that their tactics are terrible. Plus, they need to start finding people we actually WANT to see naked.
Like Jon Hamm, for instance. ~I'd rather go naked than eat Hamm.~ Or something.