As you probably know by now, Britney Spears gave up in her custody fight and agreed to let Kevin Federline have sole custody of the kids and Britney would just be happy visiting them from time to time. Well, it turns out that Kevin was more into the fight for the increased money and not so much for the actual kids themselves.
According to a source in Closer magazine, Kevin never wanted full responsibility. He wanted Britney to have the kids at least half the time because he is trying to work on his career and he already has the other two kids so he feels like he won't have Kevin time now that Britney has given up.
Did someone not explain to him what happens when you have kids? I know he loves his kids. I don't think there is any question about it. I do think though, that he went into this whole thing trying to get some more money in the divorce however he could get it. He was probably willing to cave on the whole custody thing if Britney would write him a bigger check each month. Unfortunately for him, Britney went off the deep end, couldn't stay organized with anything or any lawyer and probably realized she wasn't ready to be a full-time mom. Probably would have been better for the kids if she had realized that before getting pregnant. Kevin got his check but it comes with kids and not without. So, for now, no Kevin time. Ladies you will just have to wait until Kevin gets those kids raised. So, in about 10 years or so he will start partying again in his sweat suits and bling working his balding head and beer belly wondering why he isn't making the ladies tingle at the sight of the K-Fed any longer.
Dammit and I missed my chance with him when he was here last week....you know when he was working on his 'career' being paid to show up at some lame ass Edmonton bar. LMAO
ReplyDelete"... and probably realized she wasn't ready to be a full-time mom. Probably would have been better for the kids if she had realized that before getting pregnant."
ReplyDeleteAmen, Enty. She and how many thousand OTHER young girls who don't realize that motherhood is hard work until they actually have the kid, and all it does is cry and poop.
We should pay people to NOT have kids.
ReplyDeleteAgain, Idiocracy comes to mind...and these two are just prime examples of the dumbing down of America.
I seriously doubt he's worried about being strapped with these kids. Day to day care of a kid belongs to the nanny when you're rich and infamous.
ReplyDeleteHE IS A REVERSE GOLD DIGGER....GOTTA LOVE IT.....
ReplyDeletehe's a puke that got lucky by marrying the golden goose..hell, i'da married her for the money he got...
ReplyDeletewith all the money Brit provides, he'll have plenty of Kevin time. and through the years he'll continue to collect even if he marries another rich idiot. he finally found something he's good at.
ReplyDeleteI can't wait for his "moobs" to start growing. Nothing says sexy like moobs AND a sweatsuit.
ReplyDeletesheetrock - accessorized with white socks, sandals, and sideways baseball cap. ohhh yeahhhhhhhh *bowbow-chickachicka chickachicka- bowbow*
ReplyDeleteat this point the kids do have a better chance being raised by his nannies. their mom is a fuckin nutjob, that ain't changin anytime soon.
ReplyDeletesorry i can't hate Kevin, he's there...paid or not.
Jesse D - OMG!!! You NAILED it!!
ReplyDeleteThat image will be burned in my mind for the rest of the day. Too funny!
I feel so bad for these kids. I don't know if they really stand a chance.
ReplyDeleteJib - how would you be able to choose this past weekend between this douche and Gene Simmons?
And on a final note - is it just me or does the kid look like it's wearing a wig?
Enty, you're right. While Kevin does get paid, he's there for those kids. I can't blame him for that.
ReplyDeleteThis is disgusting and sad.
ReplyDeleteThose kids...Somebody help those poor kids.
lol littleoleme - I skipped it all - no patience for crowds after having to spend 10 days at the Calgary Stampede.
ReplyDeleteHell, for $20,000 a month she can give ME custody - I'll happily sit at home and raise those kids right :)
ReplyDeleteI can see where Kevin's coming from. I was divorced when my kids were small - husband could not keep his pants on - and he never exercised visitation. It was tough. I was 35 years old and wanted to go out with friends once in awhile, have some time to be a relatively young single woman. I envied my friends whose exes had every-other-weekend-and-Wednesday-night visitation, because they actually had some time to be themselves instead of being a parent every minute of every day AND working to support the kids. So I can understand Kevin wishing Britney had gotten more time with the kids. He's a young guy, he wants to have good times too.
ReplyDeleteThose kids have 2 sets of grandparents, aunts & uncles. He ought to be ashamed of himself--he is getting $240,00/year.
ReplyDeleteMy father-in-law was widowed at 34 with an 8, 7, & 3 year old, & raised the kids while unemployed with the help of his brother.
Yes, Fed-ex is with his kids, but he had 2 he could't support. Should have stopped there if he didn't want to be tied down.
From accessAtlanta, via the Real Estate Bloggers:
ReplyDeleteThings couldn't look better three years ago for Milton and Patricia Harper of Lake City, who giddily accepted the keys to a small castle, plus enough money to pay taxes on it for 25 years.
The Harpers, whom ABC chose from among 15,000 "Extreme Makeover" applicants, spent the week in Disneyland while 1,800 people swarmed about the site.
Now, the Clayton County house that "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition" built is a two-story, turreted example of how things can go wrong. It's in foreclosure.
The Harpers used the house at 5489 Ahyoka Drive as collateral for a $450,000 loan, Clayton County mortgage records show. Records at the law firm handling foreclosures for the lender, JPMorgan Chase Bank, say it is in foreclosure. The four-bedroom house with decorative rock walls and a three-car garage is scheduled for auction on the Clayton County Courthouse steps Aug. 5.
A friend doubted their business acumen. "With $450,000 "they could have just bought a business," he said.
grace? wrong thread...;-)
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean "Ladies"?! Who'd want him even now?! He's disgusting, and always has been. Ew.
ReplyDeleteHe doesn't need your pity - he will be out partying while the nannies he still is able to pay with Britney's money will be there 24/7 for the kids. Which probably is a good thing when it comes to their sanity later in life.
ReplyDeleteDidn't somebody name him "Dad of the Year" recently? Bleech.
ReplyDeleteThose kids are gonna be effed up, knowing that neither of their parents really wanted them. (No one will tell them that, but they'll figure it out eventually.)
And with $240,000 a year, I'm pretty sure Kevin could afford to hire a babysitter sometimes -- or even a nanny.
wait, she what??
ReplyDeletewhat did i miss??
i've been busy all weekend and helping to deal with paperwork this week, so i missed where she gave up visitation. last thing i saw was those pix of the kid picking up her cigs and lighter.
somebody enlighten me!!!