100% fake. Her head is clearly pasted on in every pic. If the lighting difference hadn't given it away, the sheer SIZE of her head in relation to her body would have would have.
Yeah the lens resolution of the face seems to be a completely different resolution used for the rest of the body, making it look really unnatural...not to mention, doesnt she look just a tad psychotic in the one where she's putting the turkey in the oven? She looks like the freakin' Grinch! Does she know any other way to smile? It just looks so forced and unnatural to smile up like that while you're doing that.
I was tempted to believe it was really her just because of how akward she looks. The body in those "sexy" outfits, when there's nothing sexy about her at all. I'm not saying she's ugly, but she is just too freaking wholesome - looking to be posing like this. It's quite laughable. But probably not her body.
ugh! I went to get some Triscuits out of the pantry to put in my kid's lunch for tomorrow and her face was pasted all over the box. I had to throw them away. Now my daughter is going to want to know why I packed Doritos with cheese and turkey.
I hate to be mean, but I'm gonna have nightmares of her suckin' on that spoon. She has always been ok looking and ridiculously over-the-top, but she's no Giada and smooshing tomatoes over herself (see Esquire shoot).
man! the kitty's have their claws out today. it's not a body double, it is a two month starvation diet and photoshop. i would totally tap that, and so would the three other hetero guys who read this blog.
It's not just that the photos were 'shopped (duh), it's how BADLY they were worked over. Seriously, it looks like an intern did the job on his first day.
Most of her looks believable except for her stomach Nobody with thighs like that has a flat stomach.
Not that her thighs aren't lovely, but they aren't sticks either. I've seen her on TV in her jeans and she's got a little extra around the middle that they seem to have erased.
You want to know the weirdest thing about these? They didn't even use the same body to be consistent. These are all different bodies. Look at her shoulders licking the spoon, versus her shoulders in the chop below it. Geeze, how obvious did they want to be?
Body double or not, that is a pretty bad body. She looks psycho and the outfits are hilarious - if they had only got a picture of her doing her crab walk, that would have been gold.
i photoshop for a living. its unlikely they got a body double and paid for both photoshoping and a model. to me it apears that they photoshoped her head on her own body, just picked from differnt pics, like a better body angle matched up with a better face angle. yes, they are heavily touched up, but its also really bad photography and art direction.
The picture of her with the turkey... and the one with the spoon... just can't be her body. Unless they reduced the size of it by 20%. haha!
The one on the counter, with the fuller softer looking body is obviously her. And even the last one where she has the pie in one hand...is her... with her legs slightly thinned down with photo-shop. But at least her upper body looks normal.
That picture with the turkey... that body has completely different legs than the other photo's.
The stupid thing is she looks fine at her size... there was no need to badly photo-shop the pictures.
Holy photoshop!!!
ReplyDeleteThey took a good 20-30 lbs off her.
Yeah some of these look like its a body double too.
ReplyDeleteno,no,NO!!!!
ReplyDeletelol...i have these shots saved and everytime my best freind is having a bad day i send them to her for a good laugh...works everytime.
ReplyDeletei still want to know what mag editor got paid off for this shit.
how desperate and stupid is this woman?
ReplyDeletefirst she gets married with no pre-nup
and now this
100% fake. Her head is clearly pasted on in every pic. If the lighting difference hadn't given it away, the sheer SIZE of her head in relation to her body would have would have.
ReplyDeleteIt's not even a GOOD chop job. Yikes.
Yeah the lens resolution of the face seems to be a completely different resolution used for the rest of the body, making it look really unnatural...not to mention, doesnt she look just a tad psychotic in the one where she's putting the turkey in the oven? She looks like the freakin' Grinch! Does she know any other way to smile? It just looks so forced and unnatural to smile up like that while you're doing that.
ReplyDeleteShut
ReplyDeleteThe
Fuck
Up!
That don't look right. [room is spinning] Ent, REALLY?! Did FHM try to sell this as her? That ain't right!
Hey Ent, you horny, she's carrying food and she's half nekkid...all she needs is a beer and she's your new jessica Alba.
Speaking of...does WD know you jones on her? Or is she jealous that you do?
Sorry guys, I'm playing catch up today.
I was tempted to believe it was really her just because of how akward she looks. The body in those "sexy" outfits, when there's nothing sexy about her at all. I'm not saying she's ugly, but she is just too freaking wholesome - looking to be posing like this. It's quite laughable. But probably not her body.
ReplyDeleteTalk about absolutely zero sex appeal. The photos look, well, weird..
ReplyDeleteCyn
ugh! I went to get some Triscuits out of the pantry to put in my kid's lunch for tomorrow and her face was pasted all over the box. I had to throw them away. Now my daughter is going to want to know why I packed Doritos with cheese and turkey.
ReplyDeleteit begs the question why they didn't photoshop the head too. she looks MENTAL
ReplyDeleteShe's gonna burn herself puttin' that turkey in the oven!
ReplyDeleteIn honor of it being Rachael Ray:
ReplyDeleteYUK-KO!
I hate to be mean, but I'm gonna have nightmares of her suckin' on that spoon. She has always been ok looking and ridiculously over-the-top, but she's no Giada and smooshing tomatoes over herself (see Esquire shoot).
man! the kitty's have their claws out today. it's not a body double, it is a two month starvation diet and photoshop. i would totally tap that, and so would the three other hetero guys who read this blog.
ReplyDeleteIt's not just that the photos were 'shopped (duh), it's how BADLY they were worked over. Seriously, it looks like an intern did the job on his first day.
ReplyDelete... wholesome IS sexy to me... then again I'm heterosexual.
ReplyDeleteBTW... I'd eat Rachel Ray's "pie" any day.
Ent, you're a bastard. I went thru four months of therapy the first time I saw these pics and now I'm gonna have to do it again.
ReplyDeleteI hope you gain another 100 pounds and never see your toes again the rest of your life.
Most of her looks believable except for her stomach Nobody with thighs like that has a flat stomach.
ReplyDeleteNot that her thighs aren't lovely, but they aren't sticks either. I've seen her on TV in her jeans and she's got a little extra around the middle that they seem to have erased.
But yeah, the spoon pic makes me want to barf.
You want to know the weirdest thing about these? They didn't even use the same body to be consistent. These are all different bodies. Look at her shoulders licking the spoon, versus her shoulders in the chop below it. Geeze, how obvious did they want to be?
ReplyDeleteBody double or not, that is a pretty bad body. She looks psycho and the outfits are hilarious - if they had only got a picture of her doing her crab walk, that would have been gold.
ReplyDeleteThese are two years old, folks .... she's plumped up since then .
ReplyDeleteBUT, that being said, I don't know from photoshop and even I can see that the body and the head don't match.
It's almost like someone's idea of a joke that somehow ended up seeming like a good idea at a FHM creative meeting.
That ain't right
ReplyDeleteWow.
ReplyDeleteThanks Ent.
Wow.
The Photochopping on the 3rd one is absolutely high-larious!
ReplyDeletelook how thin her arms are in the second to last photo....
ReplyDeletei photoshop for a living.
ReplyDeleteits unlikely they got a body double and paid for both photoshoping and a model.
to me it apears that they photoshoped her head on her own body, just picked from differnt pics, like a better body angle matched up with a better face angle. yes, they are heavily touched up, but its also really bad photography and art direction.
very wrong in many ways.
ReplyDeleteshe must have felt like an asshole after seeing this published
ReplyDeleteNow granted these are old pictures...
ReplyDeleteThe picture of her with the turkey... and the one with the spoon... just can't be her body. Unless they reduced the size of it by 20%. haha!
The one on the counter, with the fuller softer looking body is obviously her. And even the last one where she has the pie in one hand...is her... with her legs slightly thinned down with photo-shop. But at least her upper body looks normal.
That picture with the turkey... that body has completely different legs than the other photo's.
The stupid thing is she looks fine at her size... there was no need to badly photo-shop the pictures.
I don't get all the hate on rachael ray... I suppose I just hate giada 600x more ahahaha.
ReplyDelete