ZX--Two Combined Posts, Three Photos
**Originally, ZX wrote the name of the photographer and the make-up artist, but I deleted them because it would make it too easy to guess ZX. If you recognize them, then please send me an e-mail before you post ZX's identity in the comments section much like the woman did from ABC. ZX and I are trying to keep her identity a secret at least through May. I will say that one specific guess made ZX really hysterical. It seems that one person guessed Miss No-Pants. **
If only I had not been crazed and on my way to a photo shoot, I would have been more specific about the fact that Frankie said to a birthday party WITH Ryan Gosling, not Ryan Gosling's birthday party, but it doesn't matter because we confused Parc with Mood and never ended up at the party anyway. I was wondering why Frankie and crew never showed up... Found all this out later when my best friend was telling someone this story and he claimed to be Ryan G's close friend. Anyway, to all you doubters, you should know by now that I have trouble being organized with almost every element of my life. I just thought this particular snafu was so funny I wanted to share it.
Photo shoot was lots of fun although I think the engineering of Mulholland Drive is a conspiracy. Why did they make it so difficult to simply stay on the same street. One minute you're merrily on Mulholland talking on the phone and cursing zen drivers and the next you're rudely dumped in Hollywood or the Valley. I have to read two scripts tonight but I'll use my handy dandy fact checker next time I want to relate a night on the town.
Here are the photos from the shoot. The first is of the view on the Hollywood side of Mulholland. The second is the sumptuous clothes I wore. The third is the photographer and the makeup artist.
the clothing on the hanger doesn't look like it's made for a big girl, or someone 40 lbs overweight unless said person was pin thin to begin w/. nice looking duds tho! *trying to guess shoe size cuz i'm nosy*
ReplyDeletekeep up the great posts zx! we love it!
Will you have a "Sumptious Clothes Yardsale" please?
ReplyDeletewhoa, no comments yet? color me shocked! I am absolutely no closer to figuring this one out. I'm excited you've said May though. even if you don't divulge info past that, it makes the guessing game seem less indefinate!
ReplyDeleteBrittany Murphy?
ReplyDeleteha, guess everyone came at once! = )
ReplyDeleteNo Pants being who? Sienna Miller?
ReplyDeleteIt would be a good guess given the britspeak, youth, frequent photo shoots while promoting nada, film releases, etc.
But not a non-smoker (from what I recall), definitely not a non-drinker.
DNfromMN
This is fun. Thanks for the behind-the-scenes pictures, ZX.
ReplyDeleteI think the subtext here is that we'll be seeing these photos somewhere in May, which will make guessing a LOT easier.
(And add me to the group that thinks the 40 pound weight gain was an exaggeration for comic effect).
Can't wait to see that shot by the pool!
Ok the makeup person has some seriously fantastic bangs!
ReplyDeletekate winslet?
ReplyDeleteI take it the publication with the photos from that location in those clothes will be on newstands in May......
ReplyDeleteyou guys know little about publishing...no way these pics are for a may issue. all print pubs had their may issues in the bag by march at the latest.
ReplyDeleteKate Winslet is married. Would have been cool though.
ReplyDeleteNo pants is Fergie
ReplyDeleteit would be the june issue most likely. so what mags? jane, interview, or maybe glamour? ashley simpson is going to be on the june cover of cosmo.
ReplyDelete^not necessarily. photoshoots can happen, a really nice spread, and can be help for a few months. it's pretty standard for that to happen. since the subject is an actress, may there's a tie-in between a spread the publication is doing and something zx is promoting. may be months down the road. best of luck to her though. she sounds awesome.
ReplyDelete*held, not help. sorry!
ReplyDeletei normally get my cosmo at the very beginning of the month before so if she is going to be on june or july of a mag we would get it around may.
ReplyDeleteAren't most Cosmo photo shoots done in a studio?
ReplyDeleterenee zellweger
ReplyDeleteFYI-the girl in the picture is the photographer and the guy is the make-up artist
ReplyDeleteThe previous post said you did go to "frankie's" party.
ReplyDeleteanon @ 12:00. you're right...now think about how long before that the publication had to be done and good to go...before it even went to press, got all the millions of copies printed and then mailed. putting together a monthly issue of any sort of mag is not a quickie process that could be fathomed a month in advance.
ReplyDeleteI wish I had someone to dress me and do my makeup. I think that has to be the best part of being a celebrity.
ReplyDeleteI'm not thinking the shoot is for a spring/summer issue of any magazine...the colors of the clothes look very fall-ish...
ReplyDeleteOkay, if its Kate Winslett, I am seriously going to have a cow because I loves me some Kate Winslett.
ReplyDeleteI thought of Winslet too but isn't Kate happily married for a while now?
ReplyDeleteAs a life long shoe lover & Manolo/Louboutin wearer, these are the ugliest cheap shoes from several years ago. I have to go with "this is too unbelievable to be real" commenters just for that.
ReplyDelete^yes. It's not Kate. She was just in Paris.
ReplyDeleteHayden Panettiere?
hayden comes across as too younginsh tho to write that insightfully. plus isn't she american? and doesn't xz throw in the ocassion british toned lines?
ReplyDeleteOops - not Hayden Panettiere. Disregard.
ReplyDeleteNot Hayden. She's got a boyfriend.
ReplyDeleteBesides the fact that Kate Winslet is married with kids and way to big of a star to do anything like this, she doesn't have any movies out yet this year. What is wrong with you people. If your tired of guessing people it COULD actually be, quit guessing.
ReplyDelete^meow.
ReplyDelete*hands you a happy pill*
Every doubt or inaccuracy raised by commenters to her last post are addressed here. This entire post disputes every objection that has been raised: 1) how she goofed on R. Gosling's birthday and the clubs, 2) how she really is familiar with the local streets (the detail about driving on Mulholland Drive), and 3) actual photos to show that she is indeed in California and on a "shoot". There is also now an end date for all of this, probably since so many people have found it hard to believe. (Go ahead, rip me to shreds for questioning, and for not leaving a nickname, but I am not "Santa Cop" so don't use that one again, please!)
ReplyDeleteI feel really guilty now. Apologies ZX for momentarily doubting your authenticity. It's going to be tough, as I love unravelling a mystery, but I'm done with guessing. I'm just going to enjoy the blog for what it is.
ReplyDeleteI love the pics, especially the pool - we don't get many of those in England. I like the dreamy colours of the clothes too, they'd look great on a redhead...oops there I go again sorry;)
Great. Now I'm gonna be in Barnes and Noble over the next few months, poring over magazines to find the shot with the pool in the background.
ReplyDeleteI can'ts STANDS the suspense!!!!
Cyn - thanks for the photos!
Your right it could be later. i was just trying to figure out what kind of magazine it could be for. i didnt think it was cosmo either.
ReplyDeleteIs the person - no pants - referring to the olsen as they have been wearing just shirts with black tights could she be at an audition?
ReplyDeleteit could be lucky or jane mag
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 12:39 - please start using a nickname so we can tell the smart Anonymous posters from the dumb ones....lol.
ReplyDeletenot sure, but the shoes look pretty big (i would know, I have huge feet) I'm guessing a size 9 or 10.
ReplyDelete12:41 Actually it just raises more questions as 12:12 & 12:32 point out. Google Mulholland Drive from Canada & you get the same info posted here. This "writer", whether ARG or not, just doesn't pass the reality test. BTW, realtor or LA vacation pics w/ pool abound on Net
ReplyDeletethose are summer/early fall colors onthe rack/shoes.
ReplyDeleteIt's obvious that the 2nd and 3rd picture are taken at the same place because of the stonework. Also, someone already said the girl was the photographer so someone must know who she is. I also think that all the naysayers will suddenly disappear the moment ZX is revealed or say they knew it was real all along and were just helping the comments be fun.
ReplyDeleteHear hear, frequent flyer.
ReplyDeleteMay is gonna be crow-eating month for some of these posters!
Those look like clothes for InStyle mag. Haha, I may be crazy but that's my initial thought on the matter. And spring/fall works well since mags shoot 4 months in advance and it's April. Possibly later if she is on the cover though...
ReplyDeleteAccording to teh posts there are 3 real names revealed (the one with the knife picture) 1 is Fergie - as "no pants" but she doesn't have anything listed. The second is Jennifer Tilley - who has 2 movies one in production and the third is Heather Graham who also has the same as Tilley. Now EL mentioned someone guessed "no pants" so could it be one of these 3 names?
ReplyDeleteI think this would be fun if it was Emily Blunt. She is award-winning, has five movies in post-production, is British, and is only 24 years old.
ReplyDeleteWhat magazine would possibly use Payless shoes and thrift store clothing for a "shoot"? Modern Drunkard or Mad magazine maybe.
ReplyDeleteI'm getting a headache from this.
ReplyDeleteWhy would knowing the names of the photog and the make-up artist reveal the identity of ZX???
ReplyDeleteHey 11:42 -
ReplyDeleteWell I do work for a magazine and we're sending our national publication to the printer today.
I still think this site is a huge lie but I wanted to let you know that not all mags are done that far in advance.
I think it's Nikki Griffin. She's young, been in TV and movies from the late 90's to the present, and was at LA fashion week. She has 2 movies that are complete and doesn't look like she has anything currently going on.
ReplyDeleteNothing about this makes sense if you pay attention. This is a game. 1:23 It really wouldn't reveal anything, that's just a tease or "hook" to sucker people in. My co-worker looking @ the photos on my screen says the "make up" artist is heavily "made up" so he's betting that these two shown are clues to the ARG/puppetmasters as are the fingers up.
ReplyDeleteWhich actress has something coming out in May that they need to promote?
ReplyDeleteShe is average or taller in height judging by the size of the shoes in the picture.
I hope this isn't going to be like that site where the actress acted like a lonely 16 year old. When I saw the woman's photo, I knew that site was fake. She was too pretty to be lonely - unless she was mentally ill like Britney Spears.
re Shopahaulics: "not sure, but the shoes look pretty big (i would know, I have huge feet) I'm guessing a size 9 or 10."
ReplyDeleteI've got it now - it's Alexis Arquette!! ;)
Why would the names of the photographer and the makeup artist make it too easy? Are they ZX's relatives or something?
ReplyDeleteThis is fun, I just wish I had a guess... :D
So, yeah, you take their 3-fingers and tilt them downward to the floor and you've got 2 M's .... as in ...
ReplyDeleteMandy Moore??????
If you knew the name of the photographer, you could just call them and ask them who they shot the other day.
ReplyDeleteI just love ZX and that she posts for us. Keep it up girl.
ReplyDelete2:00 LOL re "I hope this isn't going to be like that site where the actress acted like a lonely 16 year old". It definitely wouldn't surprise me, although I'm leaning towards an older, middle-aged lonely woman w/ no boyfriend/husband/partner & obviously no fashion sense. Someone who hasn't done the exclusive "scenes" in LA or NY or ever travelled in sophisticated circles and probably never will. Sad.
ReplyDeleteGAC
Thanks Anonymous 2:53 PM
ReplyDeleteIs ZX Elisha Cuthbert!!!!?!
ReplyDeleteOK. I've got it. Everything you need to figure it out is right here in front of you.
ReplyDeleteVery sneaky, ZX.
Ugh this is all a big headache...let me know if/when she's revealed. Tired of all the nasty people on here that have nothing better to do than nag. :-(
ReplyDeleteI, along with the other dissenters, am not trying to anger anyone. I come to this website because it is interesting. I don't want to stop viewing the site or the comments. I believe that free speech extends to the realm of the internet (tho I am not sure) and I will speak my mind accordingly. I think the three fingers signify the blogs writer, Molly. Just a guess. I think that many of the commenters are planted. This is all getting so strange and everyone is getting so angry and mean. Kinda makes it even more fun to check in.
ReplyDeletekeira knightley?
ReplyDeleteRe: Naysayer --'Molly' who? Shannon? Or did you mean, 'Mandy' as in 'Moore'? Or Mollygood? I'm confused...
ReplyDeleteRyan Gosling was in NYC on Saturday morning...so unless he took the red eye, he wasn't in LA on Friday night.
ReplyDeleteNaysayer, yes!!! Ok let's recap shall we? Fictious party for/with Ryan Gosling, party she went to but now didn't (because it didn't exist-Ryan Gosling not in LA on Friday), doesn't live in LA (Parc, no wait not Parc!/ Party @ the Playboy mansion when there wasn't one/going down to fire?from where please/fictious manager, audition & apt/fictious corporation & accountant / photo shoot w/ "high fashion" GOODWILL OLD CHEAP clothing & shoes from years ago/ she drove getting angry @ "Zen like drivers" on Mulholland. (I know, all you people who've experienced Mulholland rushes are saying bullshit!) There's more, the language, those photos, the unreal situations and well.........is this being written for the O.J. jurors? I think they're they only ones who would buy it.
ReplyDeleteGAC
Naysayer, yes!!! Ok let's recap shall we? Fictious party for/with Ryan Gosling, party she went to but now didn't (because it didn't exist-Ryan Gosling not in LA on Friday), doesn't live in LA (Parc, no wait not Parc!/ Party @ the Playboy mansion when there wasn't one/going down to fire?from where please/fictious manager, audition & apt/fictious corporation & accountant / photo shoot w/ "high fashion" GOODWILL OLD CHEAP clothing & shoes from years ago/ she drove getting angry @ "Zen like drivers" on Mulholland. (I know, all you people who've experienced Mulholland rushes are saying bullshit!) There's more, the language, those photos, the unreal situations and well.........is this being written for the O.J. jurors? I think they're they only ones who would buy it.
ReplyDeleteGAC
Molly, the original writer or Mollygood. It's really just a shot in the dark(is that actually a saying?!?). I still think it is Molly or someone she knows because she is the one who originally tipped me off to this blog. How did others find out about this blog? Anyway, don't get me wrong, I admire whoever the writer of this blog is, and if it's Molly, more power to her because she is smart and likeable. The writer are crafty, intelligent and captivating, but it's hard to be 100% consistent and there are going to be loopholes. And I am going to point them out.
ReplyDeleteOK Molly is @ Popsugar now, I just don't think it's her style from the writing & language. This writer is really inconsistent, not just continuity but fact wise & I see some Canadian influence w/ the language and some ignorance of Americanisms as well as shows that require $ to view in Canada. Or the great north nearby (Michigan, etc?) I linked here from a BI elsewhere, probably posted by one of the die hards. I was really ill with flu, home from work & ended up reading all the comments and articles in a week. (It's very obvious this is not real when read as a whole.) Weird, I know, but the more I read the more I realized someone is scamming & trying to link or get noticed by bigger blogs, gossipists and media outlets. I check it out for the audacity and I hate to say it, how gullible some people are. An E perhaps, W.
ReplyDeleteGAC
I apologise for my double post of 6:17. GAC
ReplyDeletei thought the 3 fingers was representing the west coast.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, the photo "on the Hollywood side of Mulholland" is not of Hollywood, but of the San Fernando Valley. While it appears to have been taken from a house along Mulholland, the view is facing north towards the valley and not south towards Hollywood. The tall building at the end of the pool is the Van Nuys Courthouse and jail. Also, the sun is at the camera's back which means the shot is facing north. But then again, what is one more inconsistency in the pursuit of good fun? Maybe she should check her handy dandy fact checker before relating where Hollywood is.
ReplyDeleteAnon 9:52 --
ReplyDeleteI think you are mistaken. The sun is not behind the photographer's back.
Look at the end of the pool. The shadow from the pool edge drops from left to right, so the sun is on camera left. There is something tall to the left of the photographer casting the foreground shadow. I think the sun is actually slightly in front of the photographer (based on how that horizontal foreground shadow dips in the water), but mostly from the left.
I think the building at the tip of the pool could be Park La Brea and the distant hills rising to the right could be the Baldwin Hills/Ladera Heights area. The mountain horizon line in the Valley is more level.
Mena suvari
ReplyDeleteRachel McAdams
ReplyDeleteRachel specter
ReplyDeleteLeelee?
ReplyDeleteI'm still going with Virginia Madsen.
ReplyDeleteGingersnap-
ReplyDeleteThe Park La Brea complex is essentially along the Wilshire corridor which would mean there would be buildings of a similar height in the general area in a line from left to right. There appear to be no buildings of that height in the general area. The Van Nuys courthouse, on the other hand, stands alone, has the same massing and two dark "rectangles" of glass to match the picture.
Additionally, I agree that the sun is not directly behind the camera, it is clearly behind and to the left (see the shadow nearest to the house). The pool is rectangular with a half circle at the end. The shadow at the end of the pool is just the curve of the pool's edge. If this shot was facing south (towards Baldwin Hills), it would have to have been shot in the morning and the quality of light would be completely different. This picture appears to have been taken in the afternoon, I'd guess about 2-3:00.
-Anon 9:52
I like the Brittany Murphy guess...
ReplyDeleteJessica Alba. Nuff said.
ReplyDeleteI say it is LiLo - she left her "water" bottle in the shot of the pool.
ReplyDeleteLOL LOL LOL LOL
Just joking... I have no idea who ZX is but I can't wait to find out.
ReplyDeleteMandy Moore is on the cover of Elle for May because she is promoting her new album. So perhaps that means that she is in promotional mode right now—hence the photo shoots. Also, as discussed, she appears in independent films, three 2007 movies and one for 2008 in production-- she is not filming right now. She recently spilt with DJ AM and Zach Braft (?) and has since gained some weight (but obviously still looks amazing). I did find an article about her that said that she smoked—but I find that hard to imagine. Additionally I have no idea if she was at LA’s fashion week.
ReplyDelete~Lohan
Is that Alexi Lubomirski?
ReplyDelete8:36am--hmmmmmmm, a little bit of digging around finds a photoshoot with that same pool.
ReplyDeleteReally amy where?
ReplyDeletegoogle his name. the actual photographer doesn't look anything like the fellow in the picture, however the clothes are very familiar. ;) i don't know who she is. must be someone up and coming.
ReplyDeleteWhy would Mandy Moore be renting an apt? She would definitley OWN by now and if not, then ENT better introduce her to a real estate agent.
ReplyDeleteSheesh.
i know noone cares, but that photgrapher looks oddly familiar...
ReplyDeleteashlee simpson... look at the new pics of her in the May issue/cover of marie clair, she is by the same pool.
ReplyDeleteOops, i meant Cosmo (the inside pictures)
ReplyDeleteYa - it's not the same pool as the Marie Clair shoot.
ReplyDeleteDo you have the pics from the Cosmo?
Has anyone guessed Nikki Reed? She won an Independent Spirit Award for "Thirteen." IMDB says she's been living on her own since she's 14.
ReplyDeletenow i have myself google-imaging to look for this pool...
ReplyDeletethis pool looks like the one in the new Candies commercial with Fergie
ReplyDeleteAmber Valletta
ReplyDeleteThere sure is a photo shoot with Ashlee Simpson that looks like it was near the same pool. She is in a Black dress with white shoes.
ReplyDeletei can't believe you guys didn't find the photoshoot.
ReplyDeleteanyway for obsessive people like myself still coming to this post---i forwarded the photo of the alleged photographer to my friend who is a photo editor for a very well known magazine, and she doesn't recognize him.
amy why not post your link to the "photoshoot"?
ReplyDeleteit's under fashion 1--i don't know who the girl and the pool shown is a little different but what's most peculiar is the clothes she's wearing especially when compared to the photo of the stuff on the rack.
ReplyDeleteplease tell me i'm nuts!:D
http://www.managementartists.com/#portfolio=FASHION_1&artist=ALEXI_LUBOMIRSKI
I finally got it!
ReplyDeleteBrendalove is right all the info there. Look at the clothes and look a recent event pic's.
b :) what do you mean?
ReplyDeleteI finally got it!
Brendalove is right all the info there. Look at the clothes and look a recent event pic's.
also, amy: can't link on that, would you be able to get an address?
"keira knightley?"
ReplyDeleteCan't be, only 2 k's in the name. They are holding 3 fingers out...or should I interpret it as six???
Midwest Surfer (who doesn't know how to post any other way : (
OK i have no idea what b:) or amy means & if there's some great scoop undiscovered by the rest of us, please let us know!
ReplyDeleteI think it's likely possible that the poster known here as Hez is responsible for the ZX photos BTW. Wasn't there some promo months back about her working for a swimsuit co.?
ohhh, what event? lead a horse to water, please!!:)
ReplyDeleteyou should be able to cut and paste the link. expand this comment page to the end of the address.
B:) Do you mean look at the events posted on THIS blog or many of the gossip blogs?
ReplyDeleteamy -- In the picture with the model walking on the edge of the pool, you can clearly see a sharp squared-off corner. None of the pool corners in ZX's pool are squared. Also, the other photo with the model lounging (( as much as models "lounge" on shoots )) shows much more detail of the pool, and it doesn't match with ZX's.
ReplyDeleteAnd neither of those people in the last picture is Alexi Lubomirski.
thanks for your input my obsessive compatriot! i am very happy to announce i figured it out too!
ReplyDeleteweeeehhhhaaaa!!:D
AMY - Help a girl out! I don't see any "input" left by your obsessive compatriot... Was the comment deleted? If so, can you please repost??
ReplyDeleteenty: when do we send our zx guesses to you.we wanna swin in the pool!
ReplyDelete